| Literature DB >> 36119646 |
Wiwied Ekasari1, Dwi Fatmawati1, Siti M Khoiriah1, Wenda A Baqiuddin1, Hawi Q Nisa1, Adinda A S Maharupini1, Tutik S Wahyuni1, Rice D Oktarina1, Eko Suhartono2, Ram K Sahu3.
Abstract
Sauropus androgynus (L.) Merr., in the Indonesian local name known as "Katuk," is a tropical shrub plant of the family Euphorbiaceae. Based on genus and chemotaxonomic approaches, as well as in vitro testing of Plasmodium falciparum, leaves of S. androgynus are presumed to have an active compound content as an antimalarial. The current study aims to investigate the antimalarial activity of 96% ethanol extract and fractions of S. androgynus leaves. The ethanolic extract was fractionated using the vacuum liquid chromatography (VLC) method with three solvents of different polarities (n-hexane, chloroform, and 96% ethanol). The fraction obtained was then evaluated for antimalarial activity against P. falciparum 3D7 strain. The ethanolic extract was evaluated for antimalarial suppressive and prophylactic activity against P. berghei-infected mice, as well as inhibitory activity against the heme detoxification process in vitro. Fractionation of ethanolic extract resulted in seven combined fractions, with the most active fraction being FV (50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) = 2.042 µg/mL). The ethanolic extract showed good parasitic suppressive (therapeutic) activity with a median effective dose (ED50) value of 15.35 mg/kg body weight. In a prophylactic test, ethanolic extract showed parasite growth inhibitory activity of 67.74 ± 9.21% after the administration of 400 mg/kg body weight for 4 days before infection, and 65.30 ± 10.44% after the administration of 200 mg/kg body weight for 8 consecutive days (4 days before and after infection). The ethanolic extract also showed an effect in inhibiting the formation of β-hematin of about 26.87-79.36% at a concentration of 0.1-4 mg/mL and an IC50 value of 0.479 mg/mL. The S. androgynus leaves were shown to have antimalarial activity in vitro and in vivo, where ethanolic extract were more active compared with the fraction obtained. The antimalarial properties of the extract showed a higher suppressive activity than prophylactic activity.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36119646 PMCID: PMC9477630 DOI: 10.1155/2022/3552491
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Scientifica (Cairo) ISSN: 2090-908X
Figure 1Test scheme of antimalarial activity prophylaxis in vivo of ethanolic leaf extract of S. androgynus against P. berghei. (a) Administration of extracts 4 consecutive days before parasitic infection (groups 1–4). (b) Administration of the extract 4 days before the parasitic infection and continued 4 days after the parasitic infection (group 5–8).
IC50 value of the fraction from ethanolic leaf extract of S. androgynus.
| Fractions | Yields (%) | IC50 ( |
|---|---|---|
| FI (1, 2, 3) | 0.12 | 5044.719 |
| FII (4, 5) | 0.12 | 17.401 |
| FIII (6, 7, 8, 9) | 0.72 | 575175.293 |
| FIV (10, 11, 12, 13) | 1.08 | 1908.618 |
| FV (14, 15, 16) | 39.24 | 2.042 |
| FVI (17, 18, 19) | 51.30 | 2576.625 |
| FVII (20, 21) | 11.94 | 988.354 |
In vivo suppressive activity of ethanolic leaf extract of S. androgynus (4-day suppressive test) against P. berghei-infected mice.
| Drug/Extract | Dose (mg/kg/day) | % Parasitaemia | % Suppression | ED50 (mg/kg bw) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 0 | Day 4 | ||||
| Na CMC | — | 0.92 ± 0.27 | 7.59 ± 0.97 | — | — |
|
| |||||
| Ethanolic leaf extract of | 1 | 2.37 ± 0.64 | 6.79 ± 0.67 | 33.73 | 15.35 |
| 10 | 1.95 ± 0.46 | 5.44 ± 0.38 | 47.67 | ||
| 100 | 0.76 ± 0.25 | 3.41 ± 0.51 | 60.26 | ||
| 200 | 1.02 ± 0.34 | 3.28 ± 0.86 | 66.11 | ||
|
| |||||
| DHA-P | 20.8 + 166.4 | 1.83 ± 0.83 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 100.00 | — |
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM; n = 6; significance relative to the negative control, p < 0.05.
Figure 2The effect of ethanolic leaf extract of S. androgynus on percent parasitemia of P. berghei-infected mice on 4-day suppression test. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM; n = 6; DHA-P = dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine, EESA = ethanolic extract; numbers refer to doses in mg/kg/day.
Percentages of inhibition of parasite growth in mice infected with P. berghei treated orally by doses of ethanolic leaf extract of S. androgynus for four consecutive days before infection (D0−D3).
| Treatments | Dose (mg/kg/day) | % Parasitaemia | % Inhibition | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 6 | Day 10 | |||
| Na CMC | — | 0.26 ± 0.26 | 11.65 ± 1.50 | — |
|
| ||||
| Ethanolic leaf extract of | 100 | 1.16 ± 0.39 | 6.61 ± 1.06 | 43.36 ± 18.38 |
| 200 | 0.73 ± 0.27 | 5.70 ± 1.27 | 51.07 ± 21.77 | |
| 400 | 0.58 ± 0.38 | 3.76 ± 0.48 | 67.74 ± 9.21 | |
|
| ||||
| Doxycycline | 13 | 0.20 ± 0.12 | 3.52 ± 0.44 | 69.75 ± 8.51 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM; n = 5; significance relative to the negative control, p < 0.05.
Percentages of inhibition of parasite growth in mice infected with P. berghei treated orally by doses of ethanolic leaf extract of S. androgynus for 8 consecutive days before and after infection (D0−D7).
| Treatments | Dose (mg/kg/day) | % Parasitaemia | % Inhibition | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 6 | Day 10 | |||
| Na CMC | — | 0.26 ± 0.26 | 11.65 ± 1.50 | — |
|
| ||||
| Ethanolic leaf extract of | 100 | 1.00 ± 0.14 | 5.51 ± 0.13 | 52.70 ± 1.93 |
| 200 | 0.92 ± 0.15 | 4.04 ± 0.54 | 65.30 ± 10.44 | |
|
| ||||
| Doxycycline | 13 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 3.47 ± 0.36 | 70.23 ± 6.88 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM; n = 5; significance relative to the negative control, p < 0.05.
The mean survival time (MST) of mice receiving various doses of ethanolic leaf extract of S. androgynus during prophylactic study.
| Treatments | Dose (mg/kg/day) | MST | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Day 10 | Day 17 | ||
| Na CMC | — | 0.8 | 0 |
|
| |||
| Ethanolic leaf extract of | 100 | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| 200 | 0.8 | 0.4 | |
| 400 | 1 | 0.6 | |
|
| |||
| Doxycycline for 4 consecutive days ( | 13 | 1 | 0.6 |
|
| |||
| Ethanolic leaf extract of | 100 | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| 200 | 1 | 0.8 | |
|
| |||
| Doxycycline for 8 consecutive days ( | 13 | 1 | 0.8 |
The IC50 values of ethanolic leaf extract of S. androgynus, chloroquine diphosphate, negative control based on the inhibition test of heme detoxification.
| Drug/Extract | Concentration (mg/mL) | Concentration of hemozoin (mM) | % Inhibition | IC50 (mg/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMSO | — | 166.13 ± 11.48 | — | — |
|
| ||||
| Ethanolic leaf extract of | 4 | 34.28 ± 1.90 | 79.36 ± 1.14 | 0.479 |
| 2 | 50.29 ± 2.50 | 69.73 ± 1.50 | ||
| 1 | 67.59 ± 5.81 | 59.31 ± 3.50 | ||
| 0.5 | 81.57 ± 2.98 | 50.90 ± 1.80 | ||
| 0.25 | 95.31 ± 2.68 | 42.63 ± 1.62 | ||
| 0.1 | 121.48 ± 3.66 | 26.87 ± 2.20 | ||
|
| ||||
| Chloroquine diphosphate | 4 | 44.80 ± 3.10 | 73.04 ± 1.87 | 0.569 |
| 2 | 56.42 ± 2.60 | 66.04 ± 1.56 | ||
| 1 | 69.82 ± 4.23 | 57.97 ± 2.55 | ||
| 0.5 | 84.69 ± 2.25 | 49.02 ± 1.35 | ||
| 0.25 | 102.66 ± 3.09 | 38.21 ± 1.86 | ||
| 0.1 | 118.17 ± 4.31 | 28.87 ± 2.60 | ||