| Literature DB >> 36119412 |
Namilakonda Manaswini1, Neelam N Sreedevi2, Sabitha Thummala2, Kompella S S Saibaba2, Noorjahan Mohammed2, Oruganti Sai Satish3.
Abstract
Objective The disequilibrium between oxidant and antioxidant systems causes oxidative stress. Further, it disrupts the cell and releases reactive oxygen species (ROS), which in turn damages the vascular functions. Cyclophilin A (CypA), an immunophilin, is released in a highly regulated manner from vascular smooth muscle cells and multiplies the deleterious effects of ROS, associated with cardiovascular diseases. Thus, the aim of the present study is to correlate serum CypA levels with the severity of coronary artery disease (CAD). Materials and Methods Study participants composed of 103 adult subjects, among whom 73 subjects were cases who were diagnosed as CAD angiographically. Thirty years of age and gender-matched subjects were taken as controls. The cases were further divided into single, double, and triple vessel disease subgroups. Blood samples were collected for the estimation of serum CypA, malondialdehyde (MDA), high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP), lipid profile, and plasma-glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) by relevant biochemical methods. Statistical Analysis The analysis was done using SPSS version 25. The data were expressed as median/mean and interquartile range/standard error. The groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test and the Kruskal-Wallis test. p -Value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Comparison of area under the curve (AUC) in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves was performed. A correlation was done by Spearman rank correlation. Results The mean levels of serum CypA, hsCRP, and MDA in cases were significantly higher than those of controls (38 vs. 27 ng/mL, 18 vs. 5.1 mg/L, and 26 vs. 14 nmol/mL, p < 0.001). A positive correlation was observed between serum levels of CypA versus hsCRP and CypA versus MDA ( r = 0.36 p = 0.00, r = 0.52, p = 0.00). At cut-off values greater than 33 ng/mL and 2.1 mg/L, serum CypA and hsCRP have 71% sensitivity, 93% specificity (AUC = 0.83), 84% sensitivity, and 70% specificity (AUC = 0.78) respectively. The number of occluded vessels was positively correlated with both CypA and hsCRP. Also, Serum CypA showed a significant positive correlation with HbA1C. Conclusion Serum CypA can be used as a valuable biomarker for CAD. The Indian Association of Laboratory Physicians. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ).Entities:
Keywords: biomarker; coronary artery disease; cyclophilin A; hsCRP; malondialdehyde; sensitivity
Year: 2022 PMID: 36119412 PMCID: PMC9473941 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1742418
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Lab Physicians ISSN: 0974-2727
Baseline characteristics of cases group
| Variable |
SVD group (
|
DVD group (
|
TVD group (
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex (%) | Males | 19 (79%) | 17 (70%) | 21 (84%) |
| Females | 5 (21%) | 7 (30%) | 4 (16%) | |
| Diabetes (%) | Nondiabetics | 12 (50%) | 8 (33%) | 14 (56%) |
| Diabetics | 12 (50%) | 16 (67%) | 11 (44%) | |
| Hypertension (%) | Nonhypertensives | 8 (33%) | 10 (41%) | 10 (40%) |
| Hypertensives | 16 (67%) | 14 (59%) | 15 (60%) | |
| Smoker (%) | Nonsmokers | 13 (54%) | 11 (46%) | 14 (44%) |
| Smokers | 11 (46%) | 13 (54%) | 14 (56%) | |
| Alcoholic (%) | Nonalcoholics | 13 (54%) | 13 (54%) | 10 (40%) |
| Alcoholics | 11 (46%) | 11 (46%) | 15 (60%) |
Abbreviations: DVD, double vessel disease; SVD, single vessel disease; TVD, triple vessel disease.
Demographic and biochemical variables of cases and controls
| Variable |
Controls (
|
Cases (
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (y) | 53 (52–59) | 55 (50–62) | 0.82 |
| Gender (M:F) | 3:1 | 3:1 | – |
| TC (mg/dL) | 163 ± 7.9 | 152 ± 6.5 | 0.78 |
| HDL-C (mg/dL) | 38 ± 2.1 | 32 ± 1.0 |
|
| LDL-C (mg/dL) | 61 ± 8.6 | 88 ± 4.9 |
|
| TG (mg/dL) | 138 ± 15 | 161 ± 18 | 0.077 |
| AIP (log TG/HDL) | 4.2 ± 0.6 | 5.1 ± 0.5 |
|
| HbA1C (%) | 5.1 ± 1.5 | 7.1 ± 0.3 |
|
| S.MDA (nmol/mL) | 14 ± 1.9 | 26 ± 1.5 |
|
| hsCRP (mg/L) | 5.1 ± 1.5 | 18 ± 3.1 |
|
| CypA (ng/mL) | 27 ± 1.0 | 38 ± 1.6 |
|
Abbreviations: AIP, atherogenic index of plasma; CypA, cyclophilin A; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; hsCRP, high-sensitive C-reactive protein; IQR, Interquartile range; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; MDA, malondialdehyde; SE, standard error; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride.
Note: Data presented as median (IQR) or mean ± SE.
Statistically significant values ( p < 0.05).
Demographic and biochemical variables of SVD, DVD, TVD, and Control groups
| Variable | Controls |
SVD (
|
DVD (
|
TVD (
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (y) | 53 (43–70) | 52.5 (46–59) | 55 (47–61) | 58 (54–67) | 0.07 |
| TC (mg/dL) | 163 ± 7.9 | 156 ± 8.4 | 152 ± 7 | 143 ± 6.3 | 0.233 |
| HDL (mg/dL) | 38 ± 2.1 | 32 ± 1.2 | 32 ± 1.1 | 30 ± 1.6 |
|
| LDL (mg/dL) | 61 ± 8.6 | 82 ± 7.3 | 89 ± 4.7 | 85 ± 5.1 |
|
| TG (mg/dL) | 138 ± 15 | 206 ± 26 | 155 ± 21 | 153 ± 9.4 |
|
| AIP (log TG/HDL) | 4.2 ± 0.6 | 6.4 ± 0.6 | 4.9 ± 0.6 | 5.4 ± 0.4 |
|
| HbA1C (%) | 5.1 ± 1.5 | 6.4 ± 0.2 | 7 ± 0.3 | 7.4 ± 0.4 |
|
| MDA (nmol/mL) | 14 ± 1.9 | 26 ± 1.0 | 27 ± 5.4 | 39 ± 2.6 |
|
| hsCRP (mg/L) | 5.1 ± 1.5 | 11 ± 2.2 | 17 ± 3.6 | 30 ± 6.4 |
|
| CypA (ng/mL) | 27 ± 1.0 | 30.4 ± 1.7 | 39 ± 1.8 | 50 ± 2.9 |
|
Abbreviations: AIP, atherogenic index of plasma; CypA, cyclophilin A; DVD, double vessel cases; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; hsCRP, high sensitive C-reactive protein; IQR, Interquartile range; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; MDA, malondialdehyde; SE, standard error; SVD, single vessel disease; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; TVD, triple vessel disease.
Note: Data are presented as median (IQR) or mean ± SE.
Statistically significant values ( p < 0.05).
Comparison of serum CypA levels with CAD without DM and CAD with DM
| CypA (ng/mL) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Control | 27 |
< 0.001 (vs. CAD − DM)
|
| CAD − DM | 38.7 |
1.00
|
| CAD + DM | 40.6 |
Abbreviations: CAD, coronary artery disease; CypA, cyclophilin A; DM, diabetes mellitus.
Control vs. (CAD − DM) CAD without DM.
Control vs. (CAD + DM) CAD with DM.
CAD without DM vs. CAD with DM.
Correlation of Serum Cyclophilin A with other variables in the CAD group
| Variable | r | |
|---|---|---|
| MDA (nmol/mL) | 0.52 |
|
| hsCRP (mg/L) | 0.36 |
|
| HbA1C (%) | 0.36 |
|
| TC (mg/dL) | −0.2 |
|
| HDL (mg/dL) | −0.1 | 0.17 |
| LDL (mg/dL) | 0.2 |
|
| TG (mg/dL) | −0.5 | 0.69 |
Abbreviations: HDL, high-density lipoprotein; hsCRP, high sensitive C-reactive protein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; MDA, malondialdehyde; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride.
p < 0.05 is considered statistically significant.
Correlation between number of occluded vessels and cyclophilin A and hsCRP
| Spearman correlation |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CypA (ng/mL) | 0.73 |
|
| hsCRP (mg/L) | 0.67 |
|
Abbreviations: CypA, cyclophilin A; hsCRP, high sensitive C-reactive protein.
p < 0.05 is considered statistically significant.
Diagnostic performance of serum CypA and hsCRP
| Variable | CypA | hsCRP |
|---|---|---|
| Cut-off | > 33 (ng/mL) | > 2.1 (mg/L) |
| AUC | 0.83 | 0.78 |
| Sensitivity (%) | 71 | 84 |
| Specificity (%) | 93 | 70 |
Abbreviation: AUC, area under the curve; CypA, cyclophilin A; hsCRP, high sensitive C-reactive protein.
Fig. 1ROC curve for CypA and hsCRP. CypA, cyclophilin A; hsCRP, high sensitive C-reactive protein; ROC, receiver operating characteristic.
Logistic regression analysis
| Variable | Coefficient | Std. error |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (y) | −0.002 | 0.05 | 0.96 |
| CypA (ng/mL) | 0.1 | 0.06 |
|
| hsCRP (mg/L) | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.18 |
| MDA (nmol/mL) | 0.187 | 0.06 |
|
| TC (mg/dL) | −0.05 | 0.02 |
|
| TG (mg/dL) | 0.02 | 0.007 |
|
| HDL (mg/dL) | −0.13 | 0.06 |
|
Abbreviations: CypA, cyclophilin A; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; hsCRP, high sensitive C-reactive protein; MDA, malondialdehyde; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride.
p < 0.05 is taken statistically significant.