| Literature DB >> 36119388 |
Shun Lu1, Fanxiao Liu1, Weicheng Xu1, Xiaofeng Zhou2, Lianxin Li1, Dongsheng Zhou1, Qinghu Li1, Jinlei Dong1.
Abstract
Background: Open Tile C pelvic fractures are particularly severe. However, reports on their management and outcomes are relatively rare. This study analyzed the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with open Tile C pelvic fractures and describes our management and outcomes of these injuries.Entities:
Keywords: management; open tile C fractures; outcomes
Year: 2022 PMID: 36119388 PMCID: PMC9473294 DOI: 10.2147/TCRM.S378740
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ther Clin Risk Manag ISSN: 1176-6336 Impact factor: 2.755
Demographic Information, ISS and Mechanism of Injury
| Characteristics | Average (±SD) or No. of Patients | Range or Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 34.0±15.5 | 13–63 |
| ISS | 40.3±7.4 | 29–59 |
| No. sex(%) | 18(60%) male, 12(40%) female | |
| Mechanism of injury | ||
| Motor vehicle collision | 14 | 46.7% |
| Truck crush | 9 | 30.0% |
| Mechanical crush injury | 5 | 16.7% |
| Burn combined fall | 1 | 3.3% |
| Falling objects | 1 | 3.3% |
The Classification of Open Tile C Pelvis Fractures
| Type | No. of Patients | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Tile Classification | ||
| C1.1 | 6 | 20.0% |
| C1.2 | 12 | 40.0% |
| C1.3 | 3 | 10.0% |
| C2 | 5 | 16.7% |
| C3 | 4 | 13.3% |
| Gustilo-Anderson Classification | ||
| I | 0 | 0% |
| II | 0 | 0% |
| III | 30 | 100% |
| Faringer Classification | ||
| Zone I | 8 | 26.7% |
| Zone II | 2 | 6.7% |
| Zone III | 2 | 6.7% |
| Zone I&II | 7 | 23.3% |
| Zone I&III | 2 | 6.7% |
| Zone II&III | 2 | 6.7% |
| Zone I, II&III | 7 | 23.3% |
| Jones-Powell Classification | ||
| I | 0 | 0% |
| II | 6 | 20.0% |
| III | 24 | 80.0% |
PRBCs, ICU Stay, Operation Frequency and Hospital Stay
| Characteristics | Average (±SD) | Range |
|---|---|---|
| PRBCs (units) | 33.3±22.5 | 9.5–92.5 |
| ICU stay (days) | 11.3±12.1 | 0–46 |
| Operation frequency (times) | 6.2±3.5 | 1–16 |
| Hospital stay (days) | 81.8±46.5 | 18–218 |
Hospitalization-Related Factors of Mechanism of Injury
| ISS | PRBCs | ICU Stay | OperationFrequency | Hospital Stay | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Truck crush | 40.33±2.46 | 47.78±9.63 | 15.33±5.01 | 7.44±1.14 | 81.00±11.99 |
| Other cause | 40.05±1.64 | 27.06±3.53 | 9.57±2.30 | 5.67±0.74 | 82.14.95±11.15 |
| 0.924 | 0.018* | 0.238 | 0.212 | 0.952 |
Note: *P<0.05.
Hospitalization-Related Factors of Soft-Tissue Injuries
| ISS | PRBCs | ICU Stay | OperationFrequency | Hospital Stay | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isolated zone | 42.17±2.46 | 19.92±2.47 | 6.33±2.08 | 3.92±0.68 | 56.08±9.04 |
| Multiple zones | 38.78±1.50 | 42.18±5.79 | 14.61±3.22 | 7.72±0.77 | 98.95±11.23 |
| 0.222 | 0.006** | 0.065 | 0.002** | 0.011* |
Notes: *P<0.05, **P<0.01.
Hospitalization-Related Factors of with or Without Anorectal Injuries
| ISS | PRBCs | ICU Stay | OperationFrequency | Hospital Stay | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anorectalinjury | 42.73±1.97 | 36.85±7.09 | 12.60±3.19 | 6.47±0.87 | 83.80±11.52 |
| Withoutanorectalinjury | 37.53±1.62 | 29.70±4.18 | 10.00±3.12 | 5.93±0.94 | 79.80±12.84 |
| 0.051 | 0.393 | 0.565 | 0.680 | 0.818 |