| Literature DB >> 36119070 |
Lele Fu1,2, Haokun Liu1, Wen Chen1,2, Jamie Marie Hooft3, Margareth Øverland3, Wanjie Cai1,2, Dong Han1,2,4, Xiaoming Zhu1,4, Yunxia Yang1, Junyan Jin1, Shouqi Xie1,2,4,5.
Abstract
Inflammation is an energy-intensive process and the liver is a key organ in energy regulation. Since the intestine and liver exchange nutrients and metabolites, enteritis can affect the liver. To investigate the correlation between enteritis and liver metabolism, we developed an intestinal inflammation model with concentration-dependent 2,4,6-trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (TNBS) in gibel carp (Carassius gibelio). The results showed the dysregulation of intestinal tight junction, increased permeability of the gut barrier, and apoptosis of epithelial cells during the development of enteritis. The liver metabolome was analyzed by LC-MS and the live respiration was determined using Oxygraph-2k. The results showed that glycolysis, the TCA cycle and pyrimidine metabolism were affected by intestinal inflammation. In particular, the activity of hepatic mitochondrial respiratory chain complex I was significantly increased. Structure and abundance changes of gut microbiota were analyzed by 16S rRNA sequencing analysis. Pathogenic bacteria in the intestine, as well as plasma LPS, increased significantly. Using a liver cell line, we verified that the dysfunctional metabolism of the liver is related to the dislocation of LPS. All results imply the existence of a connection between enteritis and liver metabolism in gibel carp, and the gut microbiome plays a critical role in this process.Entities:
Keywords: endotoxin; intestinal inflammation; intestinal permeability; metabolism; mitochondrial complex I
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36119070 PMCID: PMC9479464 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.981917
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 8.786
Sequences of primers applied for quantitative real-time PCR analysis in gibel carp.
| Gene name | prime sequence | Product size (bp) | Gene bankaccession No. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Claudin 4 | F: GCCGGTGTGATTTTCATCGTT | 108 | XM_026234420.1 |
| R: CTGTGCTTGGTTCAACAAGGG | |||
| Interleukin-10 ( | F: AGCCATGGGAGAGCTTGATA | 227 | XM_026275831.1 |
| R: ATGATGACGTGCAAGCGTT | |||
| Apoptosis regulator Bcl-2 ( | F: AAAGGATGTACCAGCGCGAA | 83 | XM_026237836.1 |
| R: GGCTAAGAATCTGCGTTGCG | |||
| Caspase 3 ( | F: ATCATGACCAGGGTCAACCA | 119 | XM_026266756.1 |
| R: TACATCTCTTTGGTGAGCAT | |||
| Endoplasmic reticulum oxidoreductase 1 alpha ( | F: ATGCCCAACACAAGCAACAC | 129 | XM_026242578.1 |
| R: TGACAACAGCGACCGAAAGT | |||
| Peroxiredoxin ( | F: AGGTCATCGCTGCTTCCACCG | 90 | XM_026211451 |
| R: TGTTCATGGAGCCCAGGCCAC | |||
| CNC homolog 1 ( | F: TGGAGCGCAGGAGCTTTCGAG | 98 | XM_026282740 |
| R: AGTGGGGTTTGGTCGGCTGTG | |||
| Superoxude dismutase ( | F: GTCCGCACTACAACCCTCAT | 134 | JQ776518.1 |
| R: GGTCACCATTTTATCCACAA | |||
| Catalase ( | F: CTCCAACGGCAACTTCCCAT | 102 | JX477239.1 |
| R: CACACCTTAGTCAAATCAAA | |||
| Heat shock protein 70 ( | F: CTCAACAAGAGCATCAACCCAG | 155 | JN006055.1 |
| R: ATGACTCCACCAGCCGTTTC |
Figure 1The effect of TNBS on the intestinal morphology and tight junction. (A) Gross picture of intestinal. (B) Each group’s representative microphotograph of H&E staining paraffin-embedded sections of gut was shown (scale bar: 100μm). (C) Relative mRNA levels of tight junction related genes. (D) 125μL/kg SS and 125μL/kg TNBS representative transmission electron microscope image of intestinal (scale bar: 1μm). Red arrows represent the tight junction. (E) Gut epithelial resistance of 125μL/kg SS and 125μL/kg TNBS. All data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. (N = 6 at least). P value was calculated by Student’s t tests. *P< 0.05, compared with PBS groups.
Figure 2The effect of TNBS on the intestinal inflammation, apoptosis and oxidative damage. (A) mRNA levels of inflammatory cytokines. (B, D, E) Relative mRNA levels of apoptosis related genes. (C) Representative DAPI and TUNEL double staining of gut (scale bar: 50μm). (F) mRNA levels of oxidative-related genes. All data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. (N = 6 at least). P value was calculated by Student’s t tests. *P< 0.05, compared with PBS groups.
Alpha diversity of intestinal microbiota after treatment with SS and TNBS.
| Treat | 75 μL/kg SS | 75 μL/kg TNBS | 125 μL/kg SS | 125 μL/kg TNBS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sobs | 471.38 ± 43.12 | 479.29 ± 73.47 | 486.57 ± 57.16 | 207 ± 174.46* |
| Shannon | 3.01 ± 0.22 | 2.99 ± 0.44 | 3.00 ± 0.44 | 1.93 ± 0.97* |
| Simpson | 0.14 ± 0.03 | 0.15 ± 0.07 | 0.16 ± 0.09 | 0.35 ± 0.23 |
| Ace | 721.91 ± 104.21 | 715.75 ± 124.03 | 722.39 ± 94.77 | 309.95 ± 276.35* |
| Chao | 659.75 ± 80.58 | 641.67 ± 108.44 | 648.59 ± 68.72 | 289.76 ± 247.33* |
*Indicate a significant difference in 125μL/kg TNBS compared with 125μL/kg SS groups.
Figure 3The effect of TNBS on the intestinal microbiota. (A) The principal co-ordinates analysis (PCoA) on genus level. (B) Relative abundance on Phylum level (top 5). (C) Relative abundance on Genu level (top 10). (D) Relative abundance of 4 pathogenic bacteria. N = 6 at least. P value was calculated by Student’s t tests. *P< 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 compared with PBS groups.
Figure 4The effect of TNBS on the plasma inflammation, oxidative damage and glucolipid metabolism. (A) Plasma inflammatory cytokines, and T-AOC, SOD and GSH activity. (B) Plasma concentration of glucose, insulin, glucagon, NEFA, cholesterol and triglyceride. (C) Plasma concentration of LPS in 125μL/kg SS and 125μL/kg TNBS. (D) Plasma concentration of DAO in 125μL/kg SS and 125μL/kg TNBS. P value was calculated by Student’s t tests. All data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. (N = 6 at least). P value was calculated by Student’s t tests. *P < 0.05, compared with PBS groups.
Figure 5The effect of TNBS on the liver inflammation and energy metabolism. (A) The 25μL/kg SS and 125μL/kg TNBS representative microphotograph of H&E staining paraffin-embedded sections of liver was shown (scale bar: 50μm). (B) The PCA score plots of energy metabolism in two groups. (C) Heatmap of energy-related metabolites of two groups. (D) Schematic figure showing the energy metabolism, and box plots of the relative abundance of metabolites, red and green colors indicate significant up- and downregulation, respectively. N=6.
Figure 6The TNBS enhanced the respiratory of mitochondria in liver. (A) Representative effects of TNBS on mitochondrial function. The oxygen flux at different respiration states is obtained by introducing specific substrates and inhibitors to the samples. Red line, oxygen consumption in response to the application of substrates for complex I (CI) and II (CII) with 125 μL/kg SS. Green line, with 125 μL/kg TNBS. (B) Summarized data for oxygen consumption in the liver as measured via Oxygraph-2k high-resolution respirometry. P value was calculated by Student’s t tests. All data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. (N = 7). *P< 0.05, compared with PBS groups.
Figure 7LPS affect the metabolism of liver cell line (NCTC-1469). (A) The principal components analysis (PCA) of two groups. (B) The metabolites enriched pathways (top 25) in PBS and LPS. (C) Heatmap of carbohydrate and lipid metabolites in PBS and LPS. N = 4.