| Literature DB >> 36119014 |
Shi-Hui Wang1, Wen-Xia Liang1, Jun Lu2,3, Lu Yao2,3, Juan Wang2,3, Wen-Yuan Gao2,3.
Abstract
Objective: Fusarium oxysporum is a common pathogenic fungus in ginseng cultivation. Both pathogens and antagonistic fungi have been reported to induce plant resistance responses, thereby promoting the accumulation of secondary metabolites. The purpose of this experiment is to compare the advantages of one of the two fungi, in order to screen out more effective elicitors. The mechanism of fungal elicitor-induced plant resistance response is supplemented.Entities:
Keywords: HPLC-ESI-MSn; Panax ginseng C. A. Meyer; antagonistic fungi; functional genes; fungi elicitors; ginsenosides biosynthesis; signal molecules; transcription factors
Year: 2020 PMID: 36119014 PMCID: PMC9476754 DOI: 10.1016/j.chmed.2020.02.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chin Herb Med ISSN: 1674-6384
Fig. 1A schematic illustration of sequential signaling pathways activated in elicited ginseng (Rahimi, Kim, & Yang, 2015). Enzymes were marked in green box. The signal molecules were shown in red. ABA: abscisic acid, ACC: 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid, ACS: 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid synthase, ACO 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid, NO: nitric oxide, NOS: nitric oxide synthase, O2−: superoxide radical, H2O2: hydrogen peroxide, ROS: reactive oxygen species, SOD: superoxide dismutase, PLA: phospholipase, PAL: phenylalnine ammonialyase, TFs: transcription factors.
Sequence of primers.
| Primer names | Primer sequences (5′ to 3′) |
|---|---|
| β-actin | For: CAG AAG AGC ACC CTG TTC TTT |
| GPS | For: GTC AGA ATT GAT ATT CTT GCC CGC CC |
| FPS | For: CTG AAA TCC GAG CTA CTC AAC GA |
| SS | For: ATG GGA AGT TTG GGG GCA ATT CT |
| SE | For: AGC AGC AGT TGA CAA AGG |
| DS | For: CGG AAA CGT GTT TGG TTG CC |
| CYP716A47 | For: ATG GTG TTG TTT TTC TCC CTA TCT |
| CYP716A53v2 | For: ATG GAT CTC TTT ATC TCATCT CAA |
| UGT74AE2 | For: ATG CTG AGC AAA ACT CAC ATT A |
| UGT94Q2 | For: GGT AGA ATC AGT ATA GCG TTG C |
| UGTPg100 | For: CGCGGATCCATGAAGTCAGAATTGATATT |
| UGTPg1 | For: GGA ATG GTG GAG ATG GCT A |
| PgWRKY1 | For: CAAGCGAAAGTGCAGTTCAA |
| PgWRKY2 | For: TTTATCTCCTCGTTGAGTGTCG |
| PgWRKY3 | For: CGGAAACCCAGACTCACG |
| PgWRKY4 | For: CACCAACAGCATCAACAGCG |
| PgWRKY5 | For: GGAGCAATAGTGGCATCAACCTG |
| PgWRKY6 | For: CCATTCCCGTCAAGTTTCCAC |
| PgWRKY7 | For: CGACATTATCTTCCTTCAACTTTA |
| PgWRKY8 | For: ATGGATAACTCTCCCTCCCCTA |
| PgWRKY9 | For: GCAGAAAAGAGTGGTGTCCG |
Fig. 2Penicillium on PDA plate medium (A); Phylogenetic tree based on 18S rDNA gene sequences showing the phylogenetic relationships between Penicillium sp. YJM-2013 and closely related species (B).
Effect of Penicillium sp. YJM-2013 elicitor concentration on biomass and ginsenoside accumulation of P. ginseng adventitious roots after 5 d of elicitation (mean ± SD, n = 3).
| Elicitor concentrations/ (mg·L−1) | Fresh weight /g | Ginsenoside content /(mg·g−1) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rb group | Rg group | Ro | Total | ||
| 0 | 7.71 ± 0.30a | 4.69 ± 0.47d | 11.59 ± 0.25d | 2.64 ± 0.02d | 18.92 ± 0.74e |
| 50 | 6.91 ± 0.36ac | 10.60 ± 0.35c | 13.03 ± 0.66d | 3.81 ± 0.16c | 27.44 ± 0.85d |
| 100 | 5.86 ± 0.56bc | 12.21 ± 0.73c | 15.50 ± 0.61c | 4.82 ± 0.12b | 32.54 ± 1.23c |
| 200 | 5.78 ± 0.35b | 21.42 ± 1.05a | 21.74 ± 0.22a | 5.79 ± 0.30a | 48.95 ± 0.97a |
| 400 | 5.16 ± 0.33b | 15.35 ± 0.28b | 17.27 ± 0.53b | 3.79 ± 0.46c | 36.41 ± 0.20b |
Note: Rb group = Rb1 + Rb2 + Rb3 + Rc + Rd + Rg3 + Rh2; Rg group = Re + Rg1 + Rg2 + Rf + Rh1. Mean values followed by the same letters within a column are not significantly different according to Duncan’s multiple range test at 5% level.
Effect of F. oxysporum A547 concentration on biomass and ginsenoside accumulation of P. ginseng adventitious roots after 5 d of elicitation (mean ± SD, n = 3).
| Elicitor concentration / (mg·L−1) | Fresh weight/g | Ginsenoside content /(mg·g−1) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rb group | Rg group | Ro | Total | ||
| 0 | 6.82 ± 0.05e | 6.21 ± 0.12c | 11.57 ± 0.36b | 2.32 ± 0.01c | 20.10 ± 0.23d |
| 50 | 7.33 ± 0.06d | 6.06 ± 0.16c | 17.07 ± 1.05a | 1.90 ± 0.10c | 25.03 ± 0.99c |
| 100 | 8.43 ± 0.12c | 9.89 ± 0.56b | 17.77 ± 2.15a | 8.94 ± 1.36a | 36.60 ± 0.36a |
| 200 | 8.94 ± 0.33b | 11.44 ± 0.13a | 16.75 ± 0.35a | 7.13 ± 0.28b | 35.31 ± 0.50a |
| 400 | 10.10 ± 0.09a | 9.41 ± 0.51b | 11.78 ± 0.57b | 10.30 ± 0.35a | 31.50 ± 1.48b |
Note: Rb group = Rb1 + Rb2 + Rb3 + Rc + Rd + Rg3 + Rh2; Rg group = Re + Rg1 + Rg2 + Rf + Rh1. Mean values followed by the same letters within a column are not significantly different according to Duncan’s multiple range test at 5% level.
Fig. 3Accumulation of Ca2+ (a), H2O2 (b), ABA (c), PLA2 (d), NO (e), ET (f) in P. ginseng adventitious roots affected by Penicillium sp. YJM-2013 elicitor. Data represent as mean values ± SD of three replicates. Mean separation within column by Duncan’s multiple range test at P ≤ 0.05.
Fig. 4Effects of Penicillium sp. YJM-2013 elicitor on expression of PgWRKY1-9 transcription factors via ginsenoside biosynthetic pathway in P. ginseng adventitious root. Data represent as mean values ± SD of three replicates. Mean separation within column by Duncan’s multiple range test at P ≤ 0.05.
Fig. 5Expression profile for genes involved in terpenoid biosynthesis and content of monomer ginsenoside in P. ginseng adventitious root elicited by Penicillium sp. YJM-2013 elicitor. Data represent as mean values ± SD of three replicates. Mean separation within column by Duncan’s multiple range test at P ≤ 0.05.
HPLC-MSn data of ginsenosides in Penicillium sp. YJM-2013 elicitor treated P. ginseng adventitious root.
| No. | tR/min | Identification | MS/ ( | ESI(-)MSn | Distribution | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 36.45 | Rg1 | 800 | 835.3[M + Cl] − | All | Standards |
| 2 | 39.70 | Re | 946 | 981.4[M + Cl] − | All | Standards |
| 3 | 41.53 | Malonyl-Rg1 | 885 | 885[M − H] − | All | ( |
| 4 | 45.34 | Ro | 957 | 885[M − H] − | All | Standards |
| 5 | 52.12 | Rf | 801 | 835.3[M + Cl] − | All | Standards |
| 6 | 59.19 | Rb1 | 1108 | 1107.3[M − H] − | All | Standards |
| 7 | 60.45 | Rg2 | 784 | 819.4[M + Cl] − | All | Standards |
| 8 | 62.43 | Rc | 1078 | 1191.3[M-H + CH3COONa] − | All | Standards |
| 9 | 65.82 | Rb2 | 1078 | 1191.4[M-H + CH3COONa] − | All | Standards |
| 10 | 66.67 | Rb3 | 1078 | 1091.3[M-H + CH3COONa] − | All | Standards |
| 11 | 69.21 | Rd | 946 | 981.3[M + Cl] | All | Standards |
Structures of 11 kinds of identified ginsenosides (Glc, β-D-glucose; Rha, α-rhamnose; Ara (p), α- L-arabinose (pyranose); Ara (f), α-L-arabinose (furanose); Xyl, β-D-xylose; GlcUA, β-D-glucuronic acid).
| Chemical structures | Saponins | R1 | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ginsenoside Rb1 | Glc(2–1)Glc | Glc(6–1)Glc | |
| Ginsenoside Rb2 | Glc(2–1)Glc | Glc(6–1)Ara(p) | |
| Ginsenoside Rb3 | Glc(2–1)Glc | Glc(6–1)Xyl | |
| Ginsenoside Rc | Glc(2–1)Glc | Glc(6–1)Ara(f) | |
| Ginsenoside Rd | Glc(2–1)Glc | Glc | |
| Ginsenoside Rg1 | Glc | Glc | |
| Ginsenoside Re | Glc(2–1)Rha | Glc | |
| Ginsenoside Rf | Glc(2–1)Glc | H | |
| Ginsenoside Rg2 | Glc(2–1)Rha | H | |
| Ginsenoside malonyl-Rg1 | Glc(6)Mal | Glc | |
| Ginsenoside Ro | GlcUA(2–1)Glc | Glc |