| Literature DB >> 36118972 |
Sarah M Kark1,2, Joren G Adams1,2, Mithra Sathishkumar1,2, Steven J Granger1,2, Liv McMillan1,2, Tallie Z Baram1,3,4, Michael A Yassa1,2,4.
Abstract
A child's death is a profound loss for mothers and affects hundreds of thousands of women. Mothers report inconsolable and progressive grief that is distinct from depression and impacts daily emotions and functions. The brain mechanisms responsible for this relatively common and profound mental health problem are unclear, hampering its clinical recognition and care. In an initial exploration of this condition, we used resting state functional MRI (fMRI) scans to examine functional connectivity in key circuits, and task-based fMRI to examine brain network activity in grieving mothers in response to pictures of their deceased child and as well as recognizable deceased celebrities and unfamiliar individuals. We compared nine mothers who had lost an adult child and aged-matched control mothers with a living child of a similar age. Additionally, we collected diffusion imaging scans to probe structural connectivity and complemented the imaging studies with neuropsychological assessments. Increased functional activation in Ventral Attention/Salience Networks accompanied by a reduced activation in the medial prefrontal cortex in response to the deceased child's picture robustly distinguished the grieving mothers from controls. Heightened resting-state functional connectivity between the paraventricular thalamic nucleus (PVT) and the amygdala distinguished the grieving mothers from the controls and correlated with subjective grief severity. Structurally, maternal grief and its severity were associated with alterations in corticolimbic white matter tracts. Finally, grieving mothers performed worse than controls on neuropsychological tests of learning, memory, and executive function, linked with grief severity. Reduced activation in cortical regions inhibiting emotions and changes in the PVT circuitry-a region involved in long-term emotional memories and decision making under conflict-distinguish grieving mothers from controls. Notably, the magnitude of neurobiological changes correlates with the subjective severity of grief. Together, these new discoveries delineate a prevalent and under-recognized mental health syndrome and chart a path for its appreciation and care.Entities:
Keywords: MRI; child loss; functional connectivity; maternal grief; salience network neuropsychology
Year: 2022 PMID: 36118972 PMCID: PMC9478601 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.925242
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Hum Neurosci ISSN: 1662-5161 Impact factor: 3.473
Demographic, neuropsychological, and self-report results.
| Grief ( | Control ( | Welch’s | 95% CIs | Hedges’ | |
|
| |||||
| Age | 61.846 (6.109) | 57.36 (6.425) | [−1.781, 10.752] | 0.681 | |
| Years of education | 14.222 (2.728) | 16.889 (2.848) | [−5.454, 0.121] | 0.911 | |
|
| |||||
| Beck depression inventory | 17.25 (11.548) | 3.556 (3.087) | [3.961, 23.428] | 1.538 | |
| Beck anxiety inventory | 10.75 (6.756) | 2.667 (2.062) | [2.371, 13.796] | 1.536 | |
| Epworth sleepiness scale | 6.143 (3.761) | 6.778 (2.774) | [−4.379, 3.109] | 0.182 | |
| Pittsburgh sleep quality index | 4.714 (3.039) | 6.111 (2.977) | [−4.679, 1.885] | –0.439 | |
|
| |||||
| Mini mental state exam | 28.667 (1.118) | 29 (1.118) | [−1.451, 0.784] | 0.284 | |
|
| |||||
| Forward | 10.556 (1.878) | 10 (2.398) | [−1.607, 2.718] | 0.246 | |
| Backward | 6.889 (2.088) | 7.889 (3.296) | [−3.798, 1.798] | –0.345 | |
|
| |||||
| Phonetic (FAS) | 41.444 (14.284) | 48.222 (14.202) | [−21.011, 7.456] | 0.453 | |
| Category (Animals) | 19.333 (3.64) | 21.778 (6.888) | [−8.095, 3.206] | 0.423 | |
|
| |||||
| Trails A (s) | 26.923 (7.307) | 21.189 (4.589) | [−0.458, 11.927] | 0.895 | |
| Trails B (s) | 73.977 (31.314) | 48.59 (10.936) | [0.726, 50.047] | 1.031 | |
| Trails B-A (s) | 47.053 (27.737) | 27.401 (9.946) | [−2.226, 41.53] | 0.898 | |
|
| |||||
| Last learning trial (A5) | 10.667 (2.062) | 13.889 (1.054) | [−4.905, −1.539] | 1.874 | |
| Learning over trials (LOT) | 2.956 (1.363) | 4.178 (1.44) | [−2.624, 0.179] | 0.83 | |
| Immediate recall (A6) | 7.778 (3.073) | 12.556 (1.236) | [−7.222, −2.334] | 1.942 | |
| Delayed recall (A7) | 7.778 (3.153) | 12.444 (1.424) | [−7.202, −2.132] | 1.816 | |
| Short term % retention (A6/A5) | 0.73 (0.223) | 0.906 (0.088) | [−0.353, 0.001] | 0.988 | |
| Long term % retention (A7/A5) | 0.715 (0.213) | 0.898 (0.106) | [−0.357, −0.01] | 1.037 | |
| Recognition correct | 13.333 (1.581) | 14.222 (0.833) | [−2.185, 0.408] | 0.67 | |
| Recognition FAs | 4.889 (3.855) | 0.333 (0.5) | [1.584, 7.527] | 1.578 | |
Sub-samples with self-report psychological and sleep measures denoted with an asterisks *(n = Grief subjects, n = Control subjects).
Brain areas that show a group difference on the task fMRI child response (Child > Celebrity + Random) group comparisons.
| MNI coordinates | ||||||
| Regions | BA | x | y | z | Cluster size | |
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Superior temporal gyrus | 22 | −48 | −44 | 20 | 469 | 5.34 |
| Inferior parietal lobule, supramarginal gyrus | 40 | −58 | −50 | 26 | − | 4.2 |
| Inferior parietal lobule, supramarginal gyrus | 40 | −56 | −42 | 26 | − | 3.86 |
|
| ||||||
| Mid and anterior cingulate cortex | 32 | −4 | 20 | 40 | 444 | 4.78 |
| Superior frontal gyrus | 6 | −14 | 10 | 60 | − | 4.31 |
| Midcingulate, dorsomedial frontal cortex, supplementary motor area | 6 | 4 | 10 | 46 | − | 4 |
|
| 9 | −30 | 44 | 36 | 50 | 4.23 |
|
| ||||||
| Inferior orbital frontal gyrus | 47 | 52 | 16 | −4 | 197 | 4.19 |
| Anterior insula | 13 | 44 | 10 | 0 | − | 4 |
| Superior temporal pole | 38 | 56 | 12 | −12 | − | 3.81 |
|
| ||||||
| Superior occipital gyrus | 19 | −16 | −84 | 16 | 334 | 4.08 |
| Cuneus, Calcarine sulcus | 17, 18 | 6 | −80 | 28 | − | 4.04 |
| Cuneus | 18 | 6 | −86 | 38 | − | 3.96 |
|
| ||||||
| Anterior insula | 13 | −40 | 10 | 6 | 81 | 4.08 |
| Subcentral gyrus | 4 | −56 | 0 | 8 | − | 3.34 |
| Insula, subcentral gyrus | 4 | −46 | 0 | 8 | − | 3.02 |
|
| 52 | 16 | 42 | 60 | 4.06 | |
|
| 7 | −12 | −72 | 46 | 63 | 3.91 |
|
| ||||||
| Superior occipital gyrus | 19 | −30 | −60 | 26 | 194 | 3.76 |
| Inferior parietal lobule, angular gyrus | 39 | −36 | −60 | 40 | − | 3.45 |
| Cuneus | 23 | −20 | −52 | 28 | − | 3.33 |
|
| ||||||
| Cerebellum crus I | − | 48 | −66 | −30 | 145 | 3.61 |
| Cerebellum crus I | − | 30 | −64 | −30 | − | 3.47 |
| Cerebellum crus I | − | 40 | −52 | −32 | − | 3.18 |
|
| 7 | −4 | −72 | 52 | 54 | 3.58 |
|
| 19 | −16 | −84 | 36 | 51 | 3.58 |
|
| 45 | −40 | 38 | 26 | 50 | 3.41 |
|
| 45 | −46 | 38 | 18 | − | 3.14 |
|
| − | −2 | −24 | −28 | 56 | 3.39 |
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Middle occipital gyrus | −54 | −74 | 16 | 76 | 3.69 | |
| Middle occipital gyrus | −50 | −82 | 10 | − | 2.72 | |
|
| 8 | −50 | 40 | 55 | 3.57 | |
Results are corrected for multiple comparisons using a cluster size threshold of 49 voxels.
FIGURE 1MRI results. (A) Task structure. (B) Child fMRI Response (Child > Celebrity + Random) for Grief (red) and Control (blue) mothers and the spatial overlap of voxels shared between groups (violet). (C) Independent samples t-test results demarcate greater Child fMRI Responses in Grief compared to Controls (red) and Controls compared to Grief (blue). Arrows point to regions with corresponding plots in panel (D). (D) Individual data points of Child fMRI Response magnitude in the dACC/DMPFC (top) and insula (middle) shown with standard deviation crossbars and dotted line illustrates numerical split between groups. The bottom panel of part (D) depicts a correlation between Child fMRI Response magnitude and subjective grief on the PG-13 in the inferior parietal lobule. (E) Midline view of PVT-area resting state functional connectivity analysis seed regions. (F) Resting-state fMRI results of PVT-area functional connectivity in controls (blue) and voxels that showed greater connectivity in controls compared to Grief mothers (cyan). (G) Resting-state fMRI results of PVT-area functional connectivity in Grief mothers (red) and voxels in the amygdala that showed greater connectivity in Grief mothers compared to controls (yellow). (H) Individual datapoints of PVT-area functional connectivity by group. The horizontal line highlights the complete numerical split between the groups. (I) Follow-up correlation analysis of PVT-area functional connectivity and PG-13 subjective grief scores. (J) Rendering of areas of interest in the DTI analysis. (K) Correlation plots between BGQ Total and UF (top) and HC (bottom). (L) Correlation plot shown for BGQ Total and UF: HC GFA ratio. Spearman’s rho (ρ) values are displayed with correlations. (M) Correlation between ACC surface area and subjective grief scores on the BGQ Total. DACC, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex; DMPFC, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex; PVT, paraventricular nucleus of the thalamus; Amyg., amygdala; FC, functional connectivity; PG-13, prolonged grief questionnaire; ACC, anterior cingulate cortex; GFA, generalized fractional anisotropy; BGQ, brief grief questionnaire.
Resting-state paraventricular thalamic nucleus (PVT)-area functional connectivity results (p < 0.05 uncorrected).
| MNI coordinates | ||||||
| Regions | BA | x | y | z | Cluster size | Z-score |
|
| ||||||
|
| − | −16 | −8 | −16 | 77 | 3.54 |
| Hippocampus | − | −28 | −14 | −14 | − | 3.45 |
| Amygdala | − | −20 | 0 | −22 | − | 1.82 |
|
| − | 30 | 2 | −16 | 19 | 3.3 |
|
| − | 12 | 8 | −10 | 10 | 3.01 |
|
| 32 | 6 | 40 | 6 | 48 | 2.99 |
| Anterior cingulate cortex | 32 | 4 | 50 | 8 | − | 1.88 |
| Anterior cingulate cortex | 32 | −4 | 48 | 8 | − | 1.88 |
|
| − | −24 | −32 | −10 | 32 | 2.99 |
|
| 32 | −4 | 42 | −10 | 68 | 2.94 |
| Anterior cingulate cortex | 32 | −4 | 34 | −4 | − | 2.63 |
| Anterior cingulate cortex | 32 | −6 | 52 | −4 | − | 1.98 |
|
| − | −4 | −18 | −10 | 13 | 2.89 |
|
| 32 | 0 | 20 | −8 | 30 | 2.79 |
|
| 13 | −26 | 16 | −12 | 19 | 2.46 |
|
| − | −8 | 8 | −12 | 15 | 2.4 |
|
| 13 | 40 | 18 | −14 | 15 | 2.38 |
| Insula | 13 | 36 | 16 | −6 | − | 1.92 |
|
| ||||||
|
| −24 | −34 | −10 | 20 | 3.62 | |
|
| 30 | 2 | −16 | 11 | 3.48 | |
|
| 6 | 40 | 6 | 14 | 3.32 | |
|
| −24 | −10 | −10 | 15 | 3.24 | |
|
| −4 | 46 | −10 | 26 | 3.17 | |
|
| −30 | 12 | −10 | 17 | 2.9 | |
|
| 0 | 22 | −10 | 23 | 2.61 | |
|
| ||||||
|
| − | −18 | −6 | −14 | 85 | 3.89 |
|
| − | 20 | 2 | −16 | 65 | 3.1 |
| Hippocampus | − | 16 | −10 | −12 | − | 2.51 |
|
| − | −4 | −14 | −12 | 26 | 2.93 |
|
| 32 | −6 | 50 | 10 | 21 | 2.6 |
|
| 32 | 6 | 50 | 6 | 11 | 2.39 |
|
| ||||||
|
| − | 20 | 2 | −16 | 17 | 2.53 |
|
| − | −4 | −14 | −12 | 10 | 2.48 |
|
| − | −20 | −4 | −16 | 16 | 2.34 |
FIGURE 2Neuropsychological changes in learning, memory, and executive functioning. (A) Mean RAVLT word list scores by group: Learning trials (A1–A5), interference list (B1), immediate and delayed recall, and corrected recognition (# of correct hits–# of incorrect false alarms). Standard error bars and individual datapoints are shown. (B) Individual datapoints for RAVLT false alarms shown with SD crossbars. (C) Correlation between BGQ and learning efficiency (LOT index five Total of trials (I to V)–(5X [A1])). (D) Individual datapoints for Trails B shown with SD crossbars. (E) Correlation between Trails B performance, in seconds, and subjective grief on the BGQ. RAVLT, rey auditory verbal learning test; FAs, false alarms; LOT, learning over trials.