| Literature DB >> 36118744 |
Farag Malhat1, Osama Abdallah1, Chris Anagnostopoulos2, Mohamed Hussien3, Indra Purnama4, Rania M A Helmy1, Hanim Soliman1, Dalia El-Hefny1.
Abstract
Fenpyroximate is a widely used acaricide applicable in many crops. In this study, the residue behavior of fenpyroximate on eggplant, orange, and guava was investigated. The chronic and acute dietary intake was calculated at several sampling points, and preharvest intervals (PHI) were proposed to ensure compliance with the existing maximum residue levels. A simple extraction protocol combined with ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) was employed to quantify residue levels. The method was successfully validated according to the European Union (EU) guidelines, and a limit of quantification of 0.01 mg/kg was set. The dissipation patterns in all crops could be described by the first-order kinetics model with half-lives of 1.7, 2.2, and 1.9 days for eggplants, guavas, and oranges, respectively. The dietary risk assessment at the authorized or more critical application patterns was acceptable for the consumers. For oranges and eggplant, a PHI of 3 and 7 days, respectively, can be proposed; however, a proposal was not possible for guava due to the absence of maximum residue limits (MRLs) and quantitative residue findings at all sampling points tested. The current work not only contributes to the practical application of fenpyroximate related to residue management in dryland areas, such as Egypt, but can also be used to estimate the appropriate PHIs and support the authorization of plant protection products as supplementary information.Entities:
Keywords: citrus; dissipation kinetics; eggplants; guava; residual behavior; risk assessment
Year: 2022 PMID: 36118744 PMCID: PMC9470998 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.939012
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
FIGURE 1Chemical structure of fenpyroximate (structure was created using ACD/ChemSketch).
FIGURE 2Optimizing Rf Lens voltage (A), breakdown curve (B), and product ion (C) of fenpyroximate precursor ion.
Liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) parameters for determination of fenpyroximate.
| Pesticide | Retention time (min) | Precursor ion ( | Product ion ( | Collision energy (V) | Rf lens (V) | Dwell time (min) |
| Fenpyroximate | 8.54 | 422.2 | 231 | 24 | 67 | 13.3 |
| 366.2 | 15 | 67 | 13.3 |
FIGURE 3Representative chromatograms of blank orange final extract after 20× dilution. (A) Full scan mass spectrum (B) Single Ion monitoring of the parent ion 422.2 m/z of fenpyroximate.
FIGURE 4Representative multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) chromatogram of fenpyroximate, TIC for (A) m/z = 422.2 to 366.2 and (B) m/z = 422.2 to 231 in guava, eggplant, and orange final extract (20× dilution) spiked at 0.01 mg/kg).
Linearity, reproducibility, and matrix effect (ME) results from the validation study of fenpyroximate in three commodities.
| Solvent | Eggplant | Guava | Orange | |
|
| ||||
| Linear range (mg/L) | 0.00025–0.1 | |||
| Slope | 271758 | 279106 | 285946 | 294366 |
| Intercept | –485150 | 40200 | –273498 | –349840 |
|
| 0.9994 | 0.9987 | 0.9994 | 0.9981 |
| Residual (%) | –16.3 | –15.1 | –19.8 | –14.9 |
|
| ||||
| Intraday repeatability (RSD %) ( | – | 7.4 | 4.4 | 5.3 |
| Interdays repeatability (RSD %) ( | – | 12.8 | 10.1 | 15.4 |
|
| ||||
| % Reduction compared to solvent | – | 2.7 | 5.2 | 8.3 |
aEvaluated at the LOQ level of 0.01 mg/kg.
FIGURE 5Estimation of the % matrix effect (ME) in eggplant, guava, and orange (n = 3) using four dilution and two cleanup, W/O Cleanup:% ME of matrix extracts without cleanup. 5× dilution:% ME of matrix extracts after five times dilution. 10× dilution:% ME of matrix extracts after 10 times dilution. 15× dilution:% ME of matrix extracts after 15 times dilution. 20× dilution:% ME of matrix extracts after 20 times dilution. MgSO4 + PSA:% ME of matrix extracts after cleanup with MgSO4 + PSA. MgSO4 + PSA + GCB:% ME of matrix extracts after cleanup with MgSO4 + PSA + GCB.
Recovery of fenpyroximate in eggplant, guava, and orange samples (n = 7).
| Level of fortification (mg/kg) | Eggplant | Guava | Orange | |||
| % Rec. | %RSD | % Rec. | %RSD | % Rec. | %RSD | |
| 0.01 | 107.3 | 7.4 | 102.3 | 4.4 | 104.3 | 5.3 |
| 0.1 | 96.1 | 4.1 | 98.6 | 7.2 | 95.9 | 3.3 |
| 1 | 94.5 | 5.2 | 97.8 | 6.7 | 92.4 | 8.5 |
| 4 | 93.7 | 8.6 | 92.7 | 6.1 | 96.8 | 7.9 |
FIGURE 6The dissipation behavior of fenpyroximate in eggplant, guava, and orange fruits. The residue concentrations (mg/kg) are expressed in semi-logarithmic scale.
Fenpyroximate decline kinetics in eggplant, guava, and orange fruit.
| Days after application | Eggplant | Guava | Orange |
|
| |||
| Residue (mg/kg) | Residue (mg/kg) ± SD | Residue (mg/kg) ± SD | |
| 0 | 1.64 ± 0.52 | 1.42 ± 0.2 | 1.76 ± 0.084 |
| 1 | 1.1 ± 0.058 (32.7) | 1.04 ± 0.044 (27.1) | 1.07 ± 0.197 (38.9) |
| 3 | 0.58 ± 0.006 (64.2) | 0.83 ± 0.090 (41.6) | 0.24 ± 0.155 (86.4) |
| 7 | 0.11 ± 0.023 (93.5) | 0.54 ± 0.061 (61.9) | 0.16 ± 0.142 (90.7) |
| 10 | 0.04 ± 0.006 (97.4) | 0.31 ± 0.021 (78.5) | 0.036 ± 0.002 (97.9) |
| 14 | 0.011 ± 0.006 (99.4) | 0.15 ± 0.047 (89.2) | 0.024 ± 0.008 (98.6) |
| 20 | BDL | 0.01 ± 0.002(99.3) | BDL |
| Regression equation | |||
| Coefficient( | 0.998 | 0.914 | 0.932 |
| Half-life (days) | 1.7 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
aAverage of three replicates.
bBelow the detection limit.
Terminal residues of fenpyroximate in eggplant, guava, and orange fruits.
| Dosage (g.a.i/ha) | Number of times sprayed | Days after spraying | Residue (mg/kg)a± SD | ||
| Eggplant | Guava | Orange | |||
| 25 | 2 | 3 | 0.64 ± 0.01 | 0.65 ±0.04 | 1.19 ± 0.08 |
| 7 | 0.19 ± 0.16 | 0.16 ± 0.03 | 0.23 ± 0.06 | ||
| 14 | 0.09 ± 0.04 | 0.03 ± 0.02 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | ||
| 3 | 3 | 0.86 ± 0.04 | 0.80 ± 0.06 | 1.37 ± 0.1 | |
| 7 | 0.32 ± 0.05 | 0.15 ± 0.03 | 0.36 ± 0.01 | ||
| 14 | 0.04 ± 0.04 | 0.07 ± 0.03 | 0.03 ±0.01 | ||
| 50 | 2 | 3 | 0.87 ± 0.1 | 0.85 ± 0.05 | 1.28 ± 0.22 |
| 7 | 0.27 ± 0.05 | 0.17 ± 0.06 | 0.81 ±0.12 | ||
| 14 | 0.03 ± 0.02 | 0.03 ±0.01 | 0.15 ± 0.11 | ||
| 3 | 3 | 1.34 ± 0.2 | 0.86 ±0.12 | 2.54 ± 0.49 | |
| 7 | 0.42 ± 0.11 | 0.21 ± 0.04 | 0.63 ±0.03 | ||
| 14 | 0.04 ± 0.04 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.07 ± 0.03 | ||
Long-term exposure calculations of fenpyroximate in eggplant, guava, and orange fruits for the Egyptian consumer using the RQ approach.
| Dosage | Number of | Days after | Eggplant | Guava | Orange | ||||||
| Mean | NEDI | RQ | Mean | NEDI | RQ | Mean | NEDI | RQ | |||
| 25 | 2 | 3 | 0.64 | 2.30E-03 | 0.23 | 0.65 | 7.07E-04 | 0.07 | 1.19 | 1.82E-03 | 0.18 |
| 7 | 0.19 | 7.04E-04 | 0.07 | 0.16 | 1.73E-04 | 0.02 | 0.23 | 3.54E-04 | 0.04 | ||
| 14 | 0.09 | 3.37E-04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 3.28E-05 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 4.58E-05 | 0.00 | ||
| 3 | 3 | 0.86 | 3.23E-03 | 0.32 | 0.8 | 8.63E-04 | 0.09 | 1.4 | 2.10E-03 | 0.21 | |
| 7 | 0.32 | 1.20E-03 | 0.12 | 0.15 | 1.65E-04 | 0.02 | 0.36 | 5.47E-04 | 0.05 | ||
| 14 | 0.04 | 1.50E-04 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 7.57E-05 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 4.59E-05 | 0.00 | ||
| 50 | 2 | 3 | 0.87 | 3.25E-03 | 0.33 | 0.85 | 9.15E-04 | 0.09 | 1.3 | 1.96E-03 | 0.20 |
| 7 | 0.27 | 1.03E-03 | 0.10 | 0.17 | 1.83E-04 | 0.02 | 0.81 | 1.24E-03 | 0.12 | ||
| 14 | 0.03 | 1.12E-04 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 3.23E-05 | 0.00 | 0.15 | 2.30E-04 | 0.02 | ||
| 3 | 3 | 1.3 | 5.02E-06 | 0.00 | 0.86 | 9.29E-04 | 0.09 | 2.5 | 3.88E-03 | 0.39 | |
| 7 | 0.42 | 1.56E-03 | 0.16 | 0.21 | 2.29E-04 | 0.02 | 0.63 | 9.68E-04 | 0.10 | ||
| 14 | 0.04 | 1.50E-04 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 7.53E-05 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 1.07E-04 | 0.01 | ||
NEDI, national estimated daily intake; RQ, risk quotient.
Long-term and short-term exposure calculations of fenpyroximate in eggplant, guava, and orange fruits for the European consumer using the EFSA PRIMo revision 3.
| Dosage | Number of | Days after spraying | Eggplant | Guava | Orange | ||||||
| Mean | Maximum ADI (%) | Maximum ARfD | Mean | Maximum ADI (%) | Maximum ARfD | Mean | Maximum ADI (%) | Maximum ARfD | |||
| 25 | 1 | 0 | 1.64 | 5 |
| 1.42 | 0.5 |
| 1.76 | 17 |
|
| 1 | 1.1 | 4 |
| 1.04 | 0.4 |
| 1.07 | 10 |
| ||
| 3 | 0.58 | 2 | 73 | 0.83 | 0.3 | 92 | 0.24 | 2 | 38 | ||
| 7 | 0.11 | 0.4 | 14 | 0.54 | 0.2 | 60 | 0.16 | 2 | 25 | ||
| 10 | 0.04 | 0.1 | 5 | 0.31 | 0.1 | 34 | 0.036 | 0.3 | 6 | ||
| 14 | 0.011 | 0 | 1 | 0.15 | 0.1 | 17 | 0.024 | 0.2 | 4 | ||
| 20 | < 0.01 | 0 | 1 | 0.01 | 0 | 1 | <0.01 | 0.1 | 2 | ||
| 25 | 2 | 3 | 0.64 | 2.00 | 87.00 | 0.65 | 0.20 | 72.00 | 1.19 | 11.00 |
|
| 7 | 0.19 | 0.60 | 36.00 | 0.16 | 0.1000 | 18.00 | 0.23 | 2.00 | 37.00 | ||
| 14 | 0.09 | 0.30 | 12.00 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 0.03 | 0.30 | 5.00 | ||
| 3 | 3 | 0.86 | 3.00 |
| 0.80 | 0.30 | 88.00 | 1.37 | 13.00 |
| |
| 7 | 0.32 | 1.00 | 43.00 | 0.15 | 0.10 | 17.00 | 0.36 | 3.00 | 57.00 | ||
| 14 | 0.04 | 0.10 | 5.00 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 8.00 | 0.03 | 0.30 | 5.00 | ||
| 50 | 2 | 3 | 0.87 | 3.00 |
| 0.85 | 0.30 | 94.00 | 1.28 | 12.00 |
|
| 7 | 0.27 | 0.90 | 37.00 | 0.17 | 0.10 | 19.00 | 0.81 | 8.00 |
| ||
| 14 | 0.03 | 0.10 | 4.00 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 0.15 | 1.00 | 24.00 | ||
| 3 | 3 | 1.34 | 4.00 |
| 0.86 | 0.30 | 95.00 | 2.54 | 25.00 |
| |
| 7 | 0.42 | 1.00 | 57.00 | 0.21 | 0.10 | 23.00 | 0.63 | 6.00 |
| ||
| 14 | 0.04 | 0.10 | 5.00 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 8.00 | 0.07 | 0.70 | 11.00 | ||
aBold are the values where an exceedance of the ARfD is observed. ADI, acceptable daily intake; ARfD: acute reference dose.