| Literature DB >> 36118647 |
Tomohiro Mitsui1, Yusuke Yoda1,2,3, Hironori Sunakawa1, Seiichiro Takayama4, Keiichiro Nishihara1, Atsushi Inaba1, Daiki Sato1,3, Tatsunori Minamide1, Kenji Takashima1,2, Keiichiro Nakajo1, Tatsuro Murano1, Tomohiro Kadota1, Kensuke Shinmura1, Hiroaki Ikematsu1, Tomonori Yano1,2.
Abstract
Background and study aims Gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a highly technical procedure mainly due to the distinctive shape of the stomach and diverse locations of lesions. We developed a new gastric ESD training model (G-Master) that could accurately recreate the location of the stomach and assessed the reproducibility of located lesions in the model. Methods The model comprises a simulated mucous membrane sheet made of konjac flour and a setting frame, which can simulate 11 locations of the stomach. We assessed the reproducibility of each location in the model by assessing the procedure speed and using a questionnaire that was distributed among experts. In the questionnaire, each location was scored on a six-point scale for similarity of locations. Results The mean score for all locations was high with > 4 points. Regarding locations, lower anterior and posterior walls had medium scores with 3 to 4 points. The procedure speed was slower in the greater curvature of the upper and middle gastric portions, where ESD is considered more difficult than the overall procedure speed. Conclusions The new gastric ESD training model appears to be highly reproducible for each gastric location and its application for training in assuming actual gastric ESD locations. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36118647 PMCID: PMC9473824 DOI: 10.1055/a-1845-5556
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Endosc Int Open ISSN: 2196-9736
Fig. 1 aThe plant-origin mucous membrane sheet was made out of konjac flour. The mucous membrane sheet is composed of three layers: the mucosal layer (thickness: 0.5–1.0 mm), the submucosal layer (thickness: 0.5–1.0 mm), and the muscular layer (thickness: 1.0–2.0 mm). The composition of the konjac flour was changed for each layer to simulate the strength and properties of the actual gastric mucosa. b The model consists of an esophagus-like tube, a seat position with a two-axis gimbal structure, a cardia-like section with adjustable position and angle in the XYZ direction, a spatula that imitates the greater curvature of the stomach, and a mucosal tension regulator that can reproduce the change in air volume in the stomach during ESD and adjust the tension on demand. The model can be set to various locations with nine adjustment parts. c A specialized liquid is injected into the submucosal layer. Its components are polysaccharide (0.1–10 %), sucrose (0.1–10 %), mineral salt (0.1–10 %), and dye (minute quantities).
Fig. 2Set-up of 11 locations in G-Master. The first row is the upper portion, from left a lesser curvature, b greater curvature, c anterior wall, d posterior wall. The second row is the middle portion, from left e lesser curvature, f greater curvature, g anterior wall, h posterior wall. The third row is the lower portion, from left i lesser curvature (gastric angle), j anterior wall, and k posterior wall.
Endoscopic submucosal dissection procedure data
| Total (n = 33) | |
| ESD procedure speed, median (range), min/cm2 | |
Total procedure speed | 31 (22–45) |
Dissection speed | 51 (31–79) |
| ESD procedure time, median (range), min | |
Total procedure time | 19 (14–31) |
Dissection time | 11 (7–19) |
| Areas of resected specimen, median (range), cm2 | 589 (415–687) |
| Complete resection, n (%) | 33 (100) |
| Perforation, n (%) | 0 (0) |
| ESD endoscopic submucosal dissection | |
ESD procedure speed for each location
| Total procedure speed, | Dissection speed, | ||
| Upper portion | Lesser curvature | 32 (25–40) | 51 (47–57) |
| Greater curvature | 25 (24–29) | 44 (31–48) | |
| Anterior wall | 32 (31–40) | 67 (57–79) | |
| Posterior wall | 33 (31–44) | 65 (55–77) | |
| Middle portion | Lesser curvature | 34 (33–36) | 66 (62–73) |
| Greater curvature | 23 (22–38) | 37 (34–38) | |
| Anterior wall | 36 (32–45) | 63 (51–79) | |
| Posterior wall | 31 (24–34) | 57 (44–68) | |
| Lower portion | Lesser curvature | 44 (27–44) | 66 (42–76) |
| Anterior wall | 28 (26–31) | 44 (42–46) | |
| Posterior wall | 26 (23–27) | 40 (38–41) |
Fig. 3The questionnaire responses as scored on a six-point scale. The similarity of locations was evaluated based on similarity to the actual location and feeling the scope’s movement. The mean score of similarity of locations for all locations was ≥ 4. By locations, similarity of locations of lower anterior and posterior walls were 3 to 4 points, and all other locations were ≥4 points.
Fig. 4Questionnaire responses as scored on a six-point scale. The mean score of similarity of mucosal tension changes for all locations was 4.5 points. By locations, the similarity of mucosal tension changes of all locations was ≥ 4 points