| Literature DB >> 36118504 |
Kun Tian1,2, Wenxia Xuan3, Lijie Hao4, Wenjing Wei1, Dongping Li1, Lu Zhu2.
Abstract
Under the hit of the epidemic, an increasing number of young people exchange and purchase goods by watching and resorting to mobile short video advertisements. Therefore, it is of great significance to explore the influence mechanism of mobile short video advertising on the consumption behavior of young people. This study develops a theoretical framework including fashion, socialization, entertainment, personalization, brand, psychological needs, satisfaction, and consumption behavior using a stimulus-organism-response (SOR) theory. The data from 332 young people using mobile short video advertising revealed that psychological needs exerted significant impacts on satisfaction, mediating the advertisements, and consumer satisfaction. The attributes of advertising, including fashion, socialization, entertainment, personalization, and branding, significantly promote young people's psychological needs and satisfaction. In addition, satisfaction affects consumer behavior, and in the same manner, fashion and brand attribute directly impact consumer satisfaction.Entities:
Keywords: consumer behavior; mobile short video advertising; psychological satisfaction; stimulus–organism–response theory; youth consumer
Year: 2022 PMID: 36118504 PMCID: PMC9478728 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.933542
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
FIGURE 1Model construction.
Variable scale and items of mobile short video advertisements.
| Variables | Factors | Items | References |
| Socialization | S1 | Short video ads allow me to build good social relationships with other fashionistas |
|
| S2 | Short video ads make me feel like I’m part of the fashion community | ||
| S3 | Short video ads allow me to form close friendships with fashionistas | ||
| S4 | Short video ads leave me a good impression of the fashion people around me | ||
| Fashion | F1 | Short video advertising content can make viewers look more stylish |
|
| F2 | If I watch short video ads, it makes me more stylish | ||
| F3 | Short video ads help people who watch them show fashion | ||
| F4 | People who watch short video ads have unique personalities | ||
| F5 | People who watch ads that share short videos are considered fashion setters | ||
| Entertainment | E1 | The content of short video ads is presented in an interesting way |
|
| E2 | Watching short video ads makes me feel good | ||
| E3 | Short video ads have some interesting add-ons | ||
| Personalization | P1 | Short video ads know what I want |
|
| P2 | Short video ads understand my specific fashion needs | ||
| P3 | Short video ads store my favorite fashion content and offer additional services based on my preferences | ||
| P4 | Short video ads do a great job of guessing what fashion content I want and making suggestions | ||
| Branding | B1 | When buying goods, I will consider the goods with high cost performance |
|
| B2 | When buying goods, I will consider the value of goods | ||
| B3 | Fashion items are reasonably priced when viewing short video ads | ||
| B4 | When buying goods, buy fashionable goods at reasonable prices | ||
| Psychological needs | PN1 | Short video ads can let me get more fashion information |
|
| PN2 | Short video ads can let me know more about fashion activities | ||
| PN3 | Short video ads allow me to get more useful information about fashion goods and services | ||
| Satisfaction | S1 | Watching short fashion video ads makes me feel very happy. |
|
| S2 | Watching fashion short video ads make my needs satisfied. | ||
| S3 | Watching short video ads has been very satisfying for me overall. | ||
| Consumption behavior | CB1 | I want to watch and use short video advertising content |
|
| CB2 | I plan to watch short video ads to buy fashion products in the future | ||
| CB3 | I will recommend other people watch short video advertising messages | ||
| CB4 | If my friends and relatives are looking for consumer advice, I will recommend watching short video ads |
Model reliability and validity analysis.
| Variable | Item | Standardized factor load | AVE | CR | Cronbach’s alpha |
| Socialization | S1 | 0.949 | 0.866 | 0.963 | 0.962 |
| S2 | 0.935 | ||||
| S3 | 0.928 | ||||
| S4 | 0.912 | ||||
| Fashion | F1 | 0.910 | 0.798 | 0.922 | 0.919 |
| F2 | 0.927 | ||||
| F3 | 0.842 | ||||
| Entertainment | E1 | 0.933 | 0.858 | 0.947 | 0.948 |
| E2 | 0.925 | ||||
| E3 | 0.921 | ||||
| Personalization | P1 | 0.875 | 0.795 | 0.939 | 0.939 |
| P2 | 0.916 | ||||
| P3 | 0.915 | ||||
| P4 | 0.861 | ||||
| Branding | B1 | 0.914 | 0.777 | 0.933 | 0.933 |
| B2 | 0.918 | ||||
| B3 | 0.844 | ||||
| B4 | 0.848 | ||||
| Psychological needs | PN1 | 0.897 | 0.826 | 0.934 | 0.934 |
| PN2 | 0.932 | ||||
| PN3 | 0.898 | ||||
| Satisfaction | S1 | 0.791 | 0.635 | 0.838 | 0.819 |
| S2 | 0.884 | ||||
| S3 | 0.707 | ||||
| Consumption behavior | CB1 | 0.836 | 0.719 | 0.911 | 0.910 |
| CB2 | 0.850 | ||||
| CB3 | 0.875 | ||||
| CB4 | 0.831 |
Square AVE values and correlation coefficients of each variable.
| B | P | E | S | F | PN | S | CB | |
| B | 0.881 | |||||||
| P | 0.700 | 0.892 | ||||||
| E | 0.718 | 0.655 | 0.926 | |||||
| S | 0.669 | 0.625 | 0.673 | 0.931 | ||||
| F | 0.733 | 0.715 | 0.678 | 0.638 | 0.888 | |||
| PN | 0.837 | 0.759 | 0.819 | 0.765 | 0.766 | 0.909 | ||
| S | 0.694 | 0.594 | 0.605 | 0.566 | 0.685 | 0.712 | 0.797 | |
| CB | 0.368 | 0.460 | 0.212 | 0.456 | 0.551 | 0.573 | 0.805 | 0.954 |
The diagonal is the square root of AVE.
Results of structural equation model.
| Hypothesis | Structural equation path | Path analysis | Result | ||
| H1 | S > > PN | 0.199 | 4.702 | 0.001 | Support |
| H2 | E > > PN | 0.290 | 6.149 | 0.001 | Support |
| H3 | P > > PN | 0.150 | 3.228 | 0.001 | Support |
| H4 | F > > PN | 0.106 | 2.112 | 0.035* | Support |
| H5 | F > > S | 0.283 | 3.702 | 0.001 | Support |
| H6 | B > > PN | 0.312 | 5.950 | 0.001 | Support |
| H7 | B > > S | 0.243 | 2.632 | 0.008** | Support |
| H8 | PN > > S | 0.291 | 2.946 | 0.003** | Support |
| H10 | S > > CB | 0.805 | 13.208 | 0.001 | Support |
***p-value < 0.001, **p-value < 0.01, *p-value < 0.05.
FIGURE 2Hypothesis testing results. ***p-value < 0.001, **p-value < 0.01, *p-value < 0.05.
Analysis of results of mediation effect.
| Hypothesis | Mediating path | Coefficient | 95% confidence interval | Result | |
| H9a | F > > PN > S | 0.296 | 0.164–0.434 | 0.014* | Support |
| H9b | S > > PN > > S | 0.126 | 0.058–0.207 | 0.001 | Support |
| H9c | E > > PN > > S | 0.064 | 0.009–0.131 | 0.036* | Support |
| H9d | P > > PN > > S | 0.101 | 0.045–0.170 | 0.001 | Support |
| H9e | B > > PN > > S | 0.281 | 0.146–0.418 | 0.001 | Support |
***p-value < 0.001, **p-value < 0.01, *p-value < 0.05.