| Literature DB >> 36118443 |
Xiong-Hui Xiao1, Hui Fu1.
Abstract
Passion plays a crucial role in entrepreneurial activity, while its positive spillover to the family and community domains is scant. We proposed an integrated enrichment framework of "work-family-community" based on the literature in the field. Drawing upon the matching samples of entrepreneurs' individuals, families, and communities in the China Labor-force Dynamics Survey (CLDS) database, we identified a significant positive spillover effect into the family and community domains and explored the moderating role of the entrepreneur's perceived personal control. The empirical results indicate that entrepreneurs with higher passion experience higher subjective wellbeing related to family members and have a higher likelihood of engagement in prosocial behaviors. Perceived personal control positively moderates the spillover of passion to life and economic satisfaction. The spread of an entrepreneurial role model's peer effect and the contagion of entrepreneurial passion have a significant positive impact on entrepreneurial behavior in a cluster. Synthesizing our findings, we contribute to the literature concerning work-family enrichment, entrepreneurial passion, and the spillover-crossover model and offer important implications for entrepreneurs' role transition tension.Entities:
Keywords: cluster entrepreneurship; donation behavior; enrichment theory; entrepreneurial passion; entrepreneurial well-being; positive spillover; work-family-community mesosystem; work-life balance
Year: 2022 PMID: 36118443 PMCID: PMC9480516 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.952421
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Figure 1The theoretical model of entrepreneurial passion spillover study.
Descriptive statistics and correlation analysis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Entrepreneurial passion | 12.4 | 2.33 | 1 | |||||||||||
| 2. Life satisfaction | 3.71 | 0.96 | 0.30*** | 1 | ||||||||||
| 3. Economic satisfaction | 3.25 | 1.08 | 0.26*** | 0.64*** | 1 | |||||||||
| 4. Neighbor trust | 3.7 | 0.79 | 0.13*** | 0.20*** | 0.18*** | 1 | ||||||||
| 5. Donation behavior | 0.26 | 0.44 | 0.08*** | 0.04* | 0.06** | −0.01 | 1 | |||||||
| 6. Perceived personal control | 6.95 | 2.21 | 0.23*** | 0.30*** | 0.26*** | 0.06*** | 0.03 | 1 | ||||||
| 7. Monthly working hours | 216.12 | 115.45 | −0.04 | −0.02 | −0.02 | −0.03 | −0.03 | −0.06*** | 1 | |||||
| 8. Gender | 1.38 | 0.49 | −0.03 | 0.01 | 0.03 | −0.08*** | 0.03 | −0.04* | 0.03 | 1 | ||||
| 9. Age | 42.58 | 10.24 | −0.07*** | −0.02 | −0.02 | 0.11*** | −0.02 | 0.02 | −0.07*** | −0.05** | 1 | |||
| 10. Marital status | 2.05 | 0.62 | −0.04* | −0.04* | −0.07*** | −0.03 | −0.02 | −0.01 | 0.01 | 0.09*** | 0.22*** | 1 | ||
| 11. Education level | 3.64 | 1.98 | 0.16*** | 0.05** | 0.10*** | −0.07*** | 0.12*** | 0.08*** | −0.03 | −0.04 | −0.31*** | −0.11*** | 1 | |
| 12. Family income | 77630.82 | 76536.26 | 0.12*** | 0.16*** | 0.24*** | −0.04* | 0.18*** | 0.11*** | 0.02 | 0.01 | −0.09*** | −0.08*** | 0.28*** | 1 |
*P < 0.1, **P < 0.05, ***P < 0.01
The spillover test of entrepreneurial passion with life satisfaction, economic satisfaction, neighbor trust, and donation behaviour.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | 0.099 | 0.178** | −0.247*** | 0.162 |
| (0.089) | (0.087) | (0.091) | (0.111) | |
| Age | −0.002 | 0.004 | 0.018*** | 0.006 |
| (0.005) | (0.004) | (0.005) | (0.006) | |
| Marital status | −0.096 | −0.169** | −0.139* | −0.020 |
| (0.073) | (0.071) | (0.073) | (0.091) | |
| Education level | −0.052** | −0.004 | −0.071*** | 0.082*** |
| (0.024) | (0.023) | (0.024) | (0.028) | |
| Family income | 0.000*** | 0.000*** | −0.000* | 0.000*** |
| (0.000) | (0.000) | (0.000) | (0.000) | |
| Monthly working hours | 0.000 | −0.000 | −0.000 | −0.000 |
| (0.000) | (0.000) | (0.000) | (0.000) | |
| Entrepreneurial passion | 0.217*** | 0.176*** | 0.111*** | 0.052** |
| (0.020) | (0.020) | (0.020) | (0.024) | |
| Perceived personal control | 0.226*** | 0.184*** | 0.036* | −0.005 |
| (0.021) | (0.020) | (0.021) | (0.025) | |
| N | 1,894 | 1,894 | 1,894 | 1,894 |
| Log likelihood | −2,371.3009 | −2,617.4721 | −2,151.436 | −1,048.7902 |
| chi2 | 332.547 | 323.888 | 83.487 | 76.416 |
*P < 0.1, **P < 0.05, ***P < 0.01; Inside parentheses is the standard error of a coefficient estimate.
The moderating effect test of perceived personal control.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | 0.098 | 0.178** | 0.162 | −0.247*** |
| (0.089) | (0.087) | (0.111) | (0.091) | |
| Age | −0.002 | 0.004 | 0.006 | 0.018*** |
| (0.005) | (0.004) | (0.006) | (0.005) | |
| Marital status | −0.103 | −0.179** | −0.019 | −0.140* |
| (0.073) | (0.071) | (0.092) | (0.074) | |
| Education level | −0.054** | −0.006 | 0.082*** | −0.071*** |
| (0.024) | (0.023) | (0.028) | (0.024) | |
| Family income | 0.000*** | 0.000*** | 0.000*** | −0.000* |
| (0.000) | (0.000) | (0.000) | (0.000) | |
| Monthly working hours | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| (0.000) | (0.000) | (0.000) | (0.000) | |
| Entrepreneurial passion | 0.107* | 0.056 | 0.060 | 0.097 |
| (0.059) | (0.056) | (0.072) | (0.059) | |
| Perceived personal control | 0.036 | −0.026 | 0.01000 | 0.013 |
| (0.098) | (0.093) | (0.120) | (0.097) | |
| Perceived personal control × Entrepreneurial passion | 0.016** | 0.017** | −0.001 | 0.002 |
| (0.008) | (0.008) | (0.010) | (0.008) | |
| N | 1,894 | 1,894 | 1,894 | 1,894 |
| Log likelihood | −2,369.3373 | −2,614.8165 | −1,048.7828 | −2,151.4055 |
| chi2 | 336.47400 | 329.19900 | 76.43100 | 83.54800 |
*P < 0.1, **P < 0.05, ***P < 0.01; Inside parentheses is the standard error of a coefficient estimate.
Figure 2The moderating effect of perceived personal control on entrepreneurial passion and life satisfaction.
Figure 3The moderating effect of perceived personal control on entrepreneurial passion and economic satisfaction.
T test results of the growth rate of entrepreneurial population in community.
|
|
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-entrepreneurial community | 87 | 0.7051724 | 0.1489417 | 1.389236 | 0.4090861 | 1.001259 |
| Entrepreneurial community | 152 | 0.0830395 | 0.0676411 | 0.833936 | −0.0506058 | 0.2166848 |
| Combined | 239 | 0.3095063 | 0.0716978 | 1.108422 | 0.1682629 | 0.4507497 |
| Diff | 0.6221329 | 0.1437542 | 0.3389336 | 0.9053322 | ||
| Diff = mean (Non-entrepreneurial community)–mean(Entrepreneurial community) | t = 4.3278 | |||||
| Ho:diff = 0 | Degrees of freedom = 237 | |||||
| Ha:diff <0 | Ha:diff! = 0 | Ha:diff > 0 | ||||
| Pr(T < t) = 1.0000 | Pr(|T|>|t|) = 0.0000 | Pr(T>t) = 0.0000 | ||||
T test results of the growth rate of community entrepreneurial industry cluster.
|
|
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-entrepreneurial community | 87 | 1.060486 | 0.4877133 | 4.549087 | 0.0909438 | 2.030028 |
| Entrepreneurial community | 152 | 0.2475364 | 0.0845676 | 1.04262 | 0.0804478 | 0.414625 |
| combined | 239 | 0.5434636 | 0.1865909 | 2.884625 | 0.1758829 | 0.9110442 |
| diff | 0.8129493 | 0.385012 | 0.0544664 | 1.571432 | ||
| Diff = mean (Non-entrepreneurial community)–mean (Entrepreneurial community) | t = 2.1115 | |||||
| Ho:diff = 0 | Degrees of freedom = 237 | |||||
| Ha:diff <0 | Ha:diff! = 0 | Ha:diff > 0 | ||||
| Pr(T < t) = 0.9821 | Pr(|T|>|t|) = 0.0358 | Pr(T>t) = 0.0179 | ||||
The analysis of the correlation between the growth rate of the proportion of entrepreneurial population and the difference between entrepreneurial income and community per capita income in non-entrepreneurial communities.
|
|
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 14.5176 | 3 | 4.8392 | F (3 83) = 3.71 | ||
| Prob > F = 0.0147 | ||||||
| Residual | 108.2440 | 83 | 1.3041 | R-squared = 0.1183 | ||
| Adj R-squared = 0.0864 | ||||||
| Total | 122.761673 | 86 | 1.4275 | Root MSE = 1.1420 | ||
| entre_propor_ growthrate | Coef. | Std. Err. | t | P>|t| | [95% Conf. | Interval] |
| all_population_ 2014 | −0.0055 | 0.0095 | −0.58 | 0.564 | −0.0244 | 0.0134 |
| entre_population_ 2014 | −0.2117 | 0.1173 | −1.81 | 0.075 | −0.4449 | 0.0216 |
| entre_total_ income_ new | 0.0508 | 0.0274 | 1.85 | 0.068 | −0.0038 | 0.1053 |
| _cons | 1.2793 | 0.3263 | 3.92 | 0 | 0.6303 | 1.9283 |
The analysis of the correlation between the growth rate of the proportion of entrepreneurial population and the difference between entrepreneurial income and community per capita income under the condition of large income.
|
|
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 15.3013 | 3 | 5.1004 | F(3 54) = 3.56 | ||
| Prob > F = 0.0200 | ||||||
| Residual | 77.3275 | 54 | 1.4320 | R-squared = 0.1652 | ||
| Adj R-squared = 0.1188 | ||||||
| Total | 92.6288 | 57 | 1.6251 | Root MSE = 0.1967 | ||
| entre_propor_ growthrate | Coef. | Std. Err. | t | P>|t| | [95% Conf. | Interval] |
| all_population_ 2014 | −0.0149 | 0.0118 | −1.27 | 0.210 | −0.0385 | 0.0087 |
| entre_population_ 2014 | −0.1212 | 0.1496 | −0.81 | 0.421 | −0.4212 | 0.1788 |
| entre_total_ income_new | 0.0678 | 0.0344 | 1.97 | 0.054 | −0.0011 | 0.1367 |
| _cons | 1.3033 | 0.4519 | 2.88 | 0.006 | 0.3972 | 2.2093 |
Balance test of PSM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | U | 1.3765 | 1.3871 | −2.2 | |
| M | 1.3773 | 1.3648 | 2.6 | −18.0 | |
| Age | U | 42.067 | 44.68 | −25.8 | |
| M | 42.099 | 41.181 | 9.1 | 64.9 | |
| Marital status | U | 2.0394 | 2.1129 | −11.1 | |
| M | 2.0396 | 2.0092 | 4.6 | 58.7 | |
| Education level | U | 3.7661 | 3.1263 | 34.6 | |
| M | 3.7513 | 3.7368 | 0.8 | 97.7 | |
| Family income | U | 81277 | 62713 | 25.9 | |
| M | 80273 | 74670 | 7.8 | 69.8 |
Results of PSM treatment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Life satisfaction | Unmatched | 3.80289093 | 3.31989247 | 0.48299846 | 0.054627475 | 8.84 |
| ATT | 3.80145119 | 3.26297274 | 0.538478452 | 0.076025611 | 7.08 | |
| ATU | 3.31989247 | 3.77491039 | 0.455017921 | |||
| ATE | 0.522033898 |
Instrumental variable testing results (life satisfaction).
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Average entrepreneurial passion of other community members | 0.198*** (0.045) | |
| Entrepreneurial passion | 0.330*** | |
| Control variables | Controlled | |
| N | 1,894 | 1,894 |
***P < 0.01; Inside parentheses is the standard error of a coefficient estimate.
Instrumental variable testing results (economic satisfaction).
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Average entrepreneurial passion of other community members | 0.198*** (0.045) | |
| Entrepreneurial passion | 0.274*** | |
| Control variables | Controlled | |
| N | 1,894 | 1,894 |
***P < 0.01; Inside parentheses is the standard error of a coefficient estimate.
T test results of the growth rate of the proportion of entrepreneurial population in the community.
|
|
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-entrepreneurial community | 87 | 0.6548069 | 0.1280922 | 1.194764 | 0.4001681 | 0.9094456 |
| Entrepreneurial community | 152 | 0.0492421 | 0.0520244 | 0.6414001 | −0.0535477 | 0.1520319 |
| combined | 239 | 0.2696778 | 0.0600582 | 0.9284766 | 0.1513644 | 0.3879913 |
| diff | 0.6055648 | 0.1187383 | 0.3716474 | 0.8394821 | ||
| Diff = mean(Non-entrepreneurial community)–mean(Entrepreneurial community) | t = 5.1000 | |||||
| Ho:diff = 0 | Degrees of freedom = 237 | |||||
| Ha:diff <0 | Ha:diff! = 0 | Ha:diff > 0 | ||||
| Pr(T < t) = 1.0000 | Pr(|T|>|t|) = 0.0000 | Pr(T>t) = 0.0000 | ||||