Literature DB >> 36118390

Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for the Treatment of Urological Malignancy.

Andy C Huang1,2, Allen W Chiu1,2.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery has always been the mainstay of therapeutic strategy in treatment of urological disorders. Urologic oncologic surgery is no exception in this regard and with availability of the da Vinci robotic system has favorably altered the surgical outcomes of treatment of urologic malignancies including prostatectomy, cystectomy, and partial nephrectomy. Robotic system not only makes these procedures truly minimal access but also facilitates better visualization, improved dexterity, and better outcomes in terms of surgical morbidity. In this article, we collect and review the recent articles which have studied the application of this technology and its outcomes. © Indian Association of Surgical Oncology 2017.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Nephrectomy; Prostatectomy; Robotic surgery; Urology

Year:  2017        PMID: 36118390      PMCID: PMC9478058          DOI: 10.1007/s13193-016-0582-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0975-7651


  50 in total

1.  Robotic urologic surgery: is this the way of the future?

Authors:  Mani Menon; Ashok K Hemal
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Evidence from robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Stefano Cavalleri; Giacomo Novara; Maurizio Aragona; Walter Artibani
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 3.  Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Giacomo Novara; Walter Artibani; Andrea Cestari; Antonio Galfano; Markus Graefen; Giorgio Guazzoni; Bertrand Guillonneau; Mani Menon; Francesco Montorsi; Vipul Patel; Jens Rassweiler; Hendrik Van Poppel
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-01-25       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Open to debate. The motion: Robotic partial nephrectomy is better than open partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Craig G Rogers; Jean-Jacques Patard
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Robotic and laparoscopic high extended pelvic lymph node dissection during radical cystectomy: technique and outcomes.

Authors:  Mihir M Desai; Andre K Berger; Ricardo R Brandina; Pascal Zehnder; Matthew Simmons; Monish Aron; Eila C Skinner; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Biochemical recurrence following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis of 1384 patients with a median 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Mani Menon; Mahendra Bhandari; Nilesh Gupta; Zhaoli Lane; James O Peabody; Craig G Rogers; Jesse Sammon; Sameer A Siddiqui; Mireya Diaz
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Robotic radical prostatectomy: outcomes of 500 cases.

Authors:  Vipul R Patel; Rahul Thaly; Ketul Shah
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: contemporary technique and analysis of results.

Authors:  Mani Menon; Alok Shrivastava; Sanjeev Kaul; Ketan K Badani; Michael Fumo; Mahendra Bhandari; James O Peabody
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-11-03       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical cystoprostatectomy and urinary diversion.

Authors:  M Menon; A K Hemal; A Tewari; A Shrivastava; A M Shoma; N A El-Tabey; A Shaaban; H Abol-Enein; M A Ghoneim
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  EAU guidelines on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer: summary of the 2013 guidelines.

Authors:  J Alfred Witjes; Eva Compérat; Nigel C Cowan; Maria De Santis; Georgios Gakis; Thierry Lebret; Maria J Ribal; Antoine G Van der Heijden; Amir Sherif
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 20.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.