| Literature DB >> 36118243 |
Ming-Yue Zhang1,2,3, Xue-Ying Wang1, James Ayala1,2,3, Yu-Liang Liu1,2,3, Jun-Hui An1,2,3, Dong-Hui Wang1,2,3, Zhi-Gang Cai1,2,3, Rong Hou1,2,3, Kai-Lai Cai1,2,3.
Abstract
The decline in natural mating behavior is the primary reason underlying in the poor population growth of captive giant pandas. However, the influencing factors and underlying mechanisms remain unclear to data. It is speculated that the decline in natural mating behavior could be related to the psychological stress caused by captivity, which restricts their free choice of mates. In order to test this hypothesis, we performed urinary metabolomics analysis using Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (UHPLC/-MS) combined with 16S rDNA sequencing for exploring the physiological mechanism underlying the decline in the natural mating behavior of captive giant panda. The results demonstrated that the decline in mating ability could be related to abnormalities in arginine biosynthesis and neurotransmitter synthesis. Additionally, the relative abundance of bacteria from the Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria phyla and the Acinetobacter, Weissella, and Pseudomonas genus was significantly reduced in the group with low natural mating behavior. These findings imply that the inhibition of arginine synthesis induced by environmental changes could be related to the poor libido and failure of mate selection in captive giant pandas during the breeding period. The results also demonstrate the relationship between the altered urinary microbes and metabolites related to arginine and neurotransmitter synthesis. These findings may aid in understanding the mechanism underlying environment-induced mate selection in captive giant pandas and propose a novel strategy for determining the sexual desire of giant pandas based on urinary microbes. The method would be of great significance in improving the natural reproductive success rate of captive giant pandas.Entities:
Keywords: 16s rDNA sequencing; captive giant panda; decline in mating behavior; mate choice; metabolomics
Year: 2022 PMID: 36118243 PMCID: PMC9478395 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.906737
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 6.064
Experimental grouping.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NM | Gong Zi | 711 | 2008 | Male | Captive | Yes |
| NM | ABao (Lou) | 703 | 2007 | Male | Wild | Yes |
| AI | Ying Ying | 724 | 2008 | Male | Captive | No |
| AI | Xi Lan | 731 | 2008 | Male | Captive | No |
| NM | Mei Lan | 649 | 2006 | Male | Captive | Yes |
| AI | Xing Bang | 614 | 2005 | Male | Captive | No |
| NM | Zhao Mei | 990 | 2010 | Female | Wild | Yes |
| AI | Ni Da | 995 | 2015 | Female | Captive | No |
| AI | Ya Zai | 637 | 2006 | Female | Captive | No |
| NM | ABao (USA) | 801 | 2010 | Female | Captive | Yes |
| NM | Ya Yun | 796 | 2010 | Female | Captive | Yes |
| AI | Mei Huan | 871 | 2013 | Female | Captive | No |
The animals are divided into two groups: NM group, six had successful natural mating experience (able to produce offspring through natural mating after adulthood), AI group, and another six adult giant pandas did not have successful natural mating experience (did not produce offspring through natural mating after adulthood).
Figure 1Bioinformatics analysis of differential metabolites. (A) Significant difference metabolite hierarchical clustering results in positive ion mode. (B) Significant difference metabolite hierarchical clustering results in negative ion mode. (C) Relevance among significant difference metabolites. (D) Relevance among significant difference metabolites. (E) KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of differentially expressed metabolites.
Figure 2Alpha diversity. (A) Rarefaction Curve for different samples and different groups; Rarefaction Curve is to randomly extract a certain amount of sequencing data from a sample, count the number of species they represent, and construct a curve based on the amount of sequencing data extracted and the number of corresponding species. The dilution curve can directly reflect the rationality of the amount of sequencing data, and indirectly reflect the abundance of species in the sample. When the curve tends to be flat, it means that the amount of sequencing data is reasonable. More data will only generate a small amount of new OTUs. Otherwise, it means that continuing sequencing may generate more new OTUs. (B) Shannon curve is constructed according to the microbial diversity index of each sample's sequencing amount at different sequencing depths. When the curve tends to be flat, it indicates that the amount of sequencing data is large enough to reflect the vast majority of microbial information in the sample. (C) Venn graph of OTUs clustering. Venn graph shows the common and unique OTUs between the different groups.
Comparison of α diversity parameters between the NM group and AI group.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| NM | 1270.92 ± 51.05 | 5.55 ± 0.11 | 0.92 ± 0.02 |
| AI | 1440.34 ± 197.32 | 5.30 ± 0.60 | 0.86 ± 0.04 |
The values are presented as the mean ± standard deviation.
Figure 3Urine microbial abundance and beta diversity in giant pandas between NM and AI group. (A) PCoA analysis. The abscissa represents the first principal component, the ordinate represents the second principal component, and the percentage represents the contribution to the sample difference. (B) Non-Metric Multi-Dimensional Scaling analysis; Each point represents a sample, the distance between points represents the degree of difference, and samples in the same group are represented by the same color. (C) Histogram of relative abundance of species at the level of each sample phylum. (D) Histogram of relative abundance of species at the level of each sample genus. Species with different metabolisms in different colors correspond to the legend on the right; the horizontal axis represents different samples or groups, and the vertical axis represents the relative abundance of different species. (E) Cladogram obtained by LESEF analysis. The circles radiating from the inside to the outside in the cladogram represent the taxonomic levels from phylum to genus (or species). Each small circle at a different taxonomic level represents taxonomy at that level, and the diameter of the small circle is proportional to the relative abundance. The red area and the green area represent different groups. The red nodes in the branches represent the microbial groups that play an important role in the red groups, the green nodes represent the microbial groups that play an important role in the green groups, and the yellow nodes represent the microbial groups that play an important role in the two groups. There were no microbial groups that played an important role in the group. The species names represented by the English letters in the figure are shown in the legend on the right. (F) LDA Score obtained by LEfSe analysis. The red and green areas in the LDA value distribution histogram represent different groups, the red nodes in the branches represent the microbial groups that play an important role in the red groups, and the green nodes represent the microbial groups that play an important role in the green groups. Only the species who's LDA Score is greater than the set value (the default setting is 2) are shown in the figure, and the length of the histogram represents the size of the LDA value. (G) STAMP analysis of species differences between NM group and AI group. The left figure shows the abundance ratio of different species in two samples or two groups of samples, the middle shows the difference ratio within the 95% confidence interval, the rightmost value is the p-value, p-value <0.05, indicating the difference significant.
Figure 4Correlation analysis of urine microorganisms and metabolites. (A) Hierarchical clustering heat map of spearman correlation analysis of significant difference between microbiota and metabolites. In the hierarchical clustering heat map, each row represents a significantly different genus, and each column represents a significantly different metabolite. The tree branches on the left represent the results of clustering differential bacterial genera, and the upper tree branches represent the results of clustering analysis on differential metabolites. Clusters of significantly different metabolites or different genera that appear in the same cluster have a similar correlation pattern. Each cell in the hierarchical clustering heat map contains two kinds of information (correlation coefficient r and p-value). The correlation coefficient r is represented by color. r > 0 means positive correlation, which is represented by red; r < 0 means negative correlation, which is represented by blue, and the darker the color, the stronger the correlation. p-value reflects the significant level of the correlation, p-value <0.05, represented by *; p-value <0.01, represented by **. (B) Matrix heat map of spearman correlation analysis of significant difference between microbiota and metabolites related to arginine, glutamatergic and GABAergic synthesis. The matrix graph not only shows the correlation between the significantly different bacteria and the significantly different metabolites, but also the correlation between the significantly different metabolisms and the significantly different bacteria. Taking the blue dotted line in the picture as the dividing line, the correlation coefficient matrix heat map can be divided into four icons. The upper left corner shows the correlation between significantly different bacterial groups, the lower right corner shows the correlation between significantly different metabolites, and the upper right corner and the lower left corner both show the significantly different bacterial groups and Correlations between significantly different metabolites, mirror symmetry. The Spearman correlation coefficient value r is between −1 and +1. The correlation coefficient r is represented by color. r>0 indicates a positive correlation, which is shown in red. Darker colors indicate stronger correlations. (C) Network diagram of spearman correlation analysis of significant difference between microbiota and metabolites related to arginine, glutamatergic and GABAergic synthesis. Circles in the figure represent significantly different genera, and rectangles represent significantly different metabolites. The color of the line represents the positive and negative correlation coefficient values between the two (blue for negative correlation, red for positive correlation), and the thickness of the line is proportional to the absolute value of the correlation coefficient. The size of a node is positively related to its degree, that is, the larger the degree, the larger the node size.