Literature DB >> 36118242

Development of Cordyceps javanica BE01 with enhanced virulence against Hyphantria cunea using polyethylene glycol-mediated protoplast transformation.

Wenxiu Wang1, Yahong Wang1, Guangping Dong2, Fengmao Chen1.   

Abstract

Cordyceps javanica has promising application prospects as an entomopathogenic fungus with a wide range of hosts. To enhance the virulence of C. javanica, a polyethylene glycol (PEG)-mediated protoplast genetic transformation system was constructed. Strains overexpressing the subtilisin-like protease genes CJPRB and CJPRB1 and the tripeptidyl peptidase gene CJCLN2-1 were constructed with this system, and the effects of these strains on Hyphantria cunea were tested. The aminoglycoside G418 was used at 800 μg ml-1 to screen the transformants. C. javanica hyphae were degraded with an enzyme mixture to obtain protoplasts at 1.31 × 107 protoplasts ml-1. The transformation of 2 μg of DNA into 1,000 protoplasts was achieved with 20% PEG2000, and after 6 h of recovery, the transformation efficiency was 12.33 ± 1.42 transformants μg-1 plasmid. The LT50 values of CJPRB, CJPRB1, and CJCLN2-1-overexpressing C. javanica strains were 1.32-fold, 2.21-fold, and 2.14-fold higher than that of the wild-type (WT) strain, respectively. The three overexpression strains showed no significant differences from the WT strain in terms of colony growth, conidial yield, and conidial germination rate. However, the infection rate of the CJPRB1 strain was faster than that of the WT strain, with infection occurring within 4-5 days. The CJCLN2-1 strain had a significantly higher mortality rate than the WT strain within 4-10 days after infection. A C. javanica genetic transformation system was successfully constructed for the first time, and an overexpression strain exhibited enhanced virulence to H. cunea compared with the WT strain.
Copyright © 2022 Wang, Wang, Dong and Chen.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cordycepsjavanica; Hyphantria cunea; enhanced virulence; protease; transformation system

Year:  2022        PMID: 36118242      PMCID: PMC9478556          DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.972425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Microbiol        ISSN: 1664-302X            Impact factor:   6.064


Introduction

Entomopathogenic fungi (EPFs) are recognized as important natural regulators of insect pest populations and provide an environmentally friendly alternative to chemical pesticides (Qu and Wang, 2018). Typically, the EPF releases an array of hydrolytic enzymes (proteases, chitinases, and lipases) to achieve cuticle penetration and then reaches the hemocoel through the cuticle, where it absorbs nutrients, releases toxins, destroys host cells, and ultimately kills the host (Thomas and Read, 2007; Schrank and Vainstein, 2010; Valero-Jiménez et al., 2014; Wei et al., 2017). Subtilisin-like proteases (Pr1), a class of cuticle-degrading proteases, have been implicated as virulence factors with potential applications in the engineering of genetically modified fungi for use against insects, possibly enabling hyphal invasion into the insect hemocoel through cuticle infection (Gao et al., 2020). Previous studies have shown that engineered Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae strains overexpressing Pr1 exhibited LT50 (time to kill 50% of Myzus persicae and Manduca sexta, respectively) values that were decreased by 12.5% and 25% compared with those of the respective wild-type (WT) strains (St Leger et al., 1996; Fang et al., 2009). Thus, these studies showed that genetic modification can produce strains with faster kill rates. In addition, recent studies have shown that tripeptidyl peptidase I (CLN2), which has been widely studied in the context of human disease, may play a role in the infection process of EPFs. Specifically, CLN2 is upregulated during infection and secreted into the hemolymph in insects (Tartar and Boucias, 2004). Cordyceps javanica (formerly known as Isaria javanica), belonging to the genus Cordyceps (Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Hypocreales, Cordycipitaceae, and Cordyceps) (Kepler et al., 2017), is an important EPF with a broad host range, infecting insects from 12 genera in 3 orders (Lepidoptera, Hemiptera, and Thysanoptera) (Cabanillas and Jones, 2009; Ren and Hu, 2009; Shimazu and Takatsuka, 2010; Chen et al., 2014; Hu, 2014; Gallou et al., 2016; Lin et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2019). In our previous research, an isolate of C. javanica BE01 exhibited high virulence against the widespread foliar-feeding pest Hyphantria cunea (Drury) (Wang et al., 2019). To enhance the virulence of C. javanica through genetic modification, further knowledge of the mechanism used by C. javanica to infect H. cunea is necessary. Thus, it is necessary to establish an efficient transformation system and construct genetically modified strains to study the functions of virulence-related genes. The first step in establishing the transformation system is to determine the appropriate dominant selection marker. Among selection markers, hygromycin B, Geneticin (G418), and phleomycin are widely used for the establishment of fungal transformation systems (Campbell et al., 2002; Shao et al., 2015; Nai et al., 2017; He et al., 2020). At present, the genetic transformation systems of fungi in the genus Cordyceps mainly include the Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation system and the polyethylene glycol (PEG)-mediated protoplast genetic transformation system (Huang et al., 2016; Lou et al., 2019). PEG-mediated protoplast genetic transformation has been successfully applied to many species of fungi (Wei et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2022). Protoplast preparation is the first step for the successful PEG-mediated genetic transformation of protoplasts. In addition, there are many factors that affect the efficiency of the protoplast transformation protocol, including the molecular weight and concentration of PEG, protoplast recovery time, and plasmid concentration (Li et al., 2017; Díaz et al., 2019; Amalamol et al., 2022). The objective of this study was to establish a PEG-mediated genetic transformation system for C. javanica and to identify the factors affecting the transformation efficiency. In addition, we further investigated whether overexpression of the C. javanica subtilisin-like proteases CJPRB and CJPRB1 and the tripeptidyl peptidase CJCLN2-1 could enhance the virulence of C. javanica against H. cunea.

Materials and methods

Strain, culture conditions, and plasmid

The strain C. javanica BE01 was isolated from H. cunea larvae (Wang et al., 2019) and routinely maintained on sabouraud dextrose agar medium with yeast extract (SDAY) (Gallou et al., 2016). BE01 was grown on SDAY at 25°C for 5 days. Then, the young mycelia were removed for shake flask cultivation. The plasmid PYF11-GFP used in the experiment was stored in the Pathology Laboratory of Nanjing Forestry University. This plasmid includes an RP27 promoter, a green fluorescent protein gene (gfp), a TrpC promoter, a neo gene, and a TrpC terminator. The neo gene encodes a neomycin phosphotransferase that mediates resistance to G418 (a broad-spectrum aminoglycoside antibiotic). The plasmids PYF11-CJPRB, PYF11-CJPRB1, and PYF11-CJCLN2-1 were constructed. The identification and phylogenetic tree of the subtilisin-like proteases CJPRB and CJPRB1 and tripeptidyl peptidase CJCLN2-1 (GenBank: URX52600.1, URX52601.1, URX52602.1) are shown in Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Figure 1. The coding sequences of CJPRB, CJPRB1, and CJCLN2-1 (GenBank: OM468894, OM468895, and OM468896) were cloned from C. javanica strain BE01 with the primer pairs CJPRB-F/R, CJPRB1-F/R, and CJCLN2-1-F/R, respectively (Supplementary Table 2). Then, the CJPRB, CJPRB1, and CJCLN2-1 fragments were ligated into XhoI-cut PYF11-GFP to generate PYF11-CJPRB, PYF11-CJPRB1, and PYF11-CJCLN2-1, respectively. Homologous DNA recombination was performed using a ClonExpress Ultra One Step Cloning Kit (Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd).

Antibiotic resistance test of Cordyceps javanica BE01

BE01 conidia (1 × 102 conidia ml−1) were added to 15 ml of SDAY supplemented with Geneticin and different concentrations of the aminoglycoside G418 (0, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900, or 1,000 μg ml−1). Each mixture was poured into a Petri dish and incubated at 25°C for 7 days, and the growth of BE01 was observed. Antibiotic concentrations that completely inhibited fungal growth were used for fungal genetic transformation.

Polyethylene-glycol-mediated transformation of Cordyceps javanica BE01

Protoplast preparation

BE01 was cultured in SDY in a shake flask at 25°C and 110 rpm for 3 days, and then a single-layer Miracloth filter was used to collect mycelia. The mycelia were washed three times with sterile distilled water and then three times with 0.7 M NaCl. In parallel, the enzyme mixture (3 mg ml−1 lysing enzyme (Sigma), 7 mg ml−1 driselase (Sigma), and 0.5 mg ml−1 chitinase (Sigma) added in 30 ml of 0.7 M NaCl solution) was prepared, and filtered through a 0.22 μm filter. The washed mycelia were added to the filtered enzyme mixture, and the mixture was incubated at 25°C and 60 rpm for 3 h. Then, the protoplasts were collected by filtration through a double-layer Miracloth filter. The filtrate containing protoplasts was centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 8 min at 4°C, and the supernatant was discarded. The protoplasts were washed with 0.7 M NaCl solution and then resuspended in STC buffer (sorbitol, 145.74 g; Tris–HCl, 6.06 g; CaCl2, 5.55 g; 1,000 ml of sterile distilled water; pH 8.0). The initial recorded concentration was 1.31 × 107 protoplasts ml−1, which was adjusted to 1.0 × 104 protoplasts ml−1.

Polyethylene glycol/CaCl2-mediated fungal transformation

Plasmid (2, 5, or 10 μg) was added to 100 μl of protoplasts in STC buffer (1.0 × 104 protoplasts ml−1), and the mixture was incubated at room temperature for 30 min. Then, 1 ml of PTC solution (10–60% PEG2000/4000/6000 in STC buffer) was added, and the mixture was mixed well and kept at room temperature for 20 min. Each mixture was then mixed with 3 ml of SDY and incubated at 25°C and 60 rpm for 0, 6, 12, or 24 h. Then, each mixture was added to freshly autoclaved SDAY (cooled to 50°C) with 800 μg ml−1 G418, and the medium was mixed and poured into a Petri dish. After 7 days of incubation at 25°C, transformants could be observed.

Transformant screening

The positive transformants were subcultured on nonselective SDAY medium and then cultured on selective medium (supplemented with the antibiotic G418) to reveal the resistance phenotype, and confirmed transformants were finally obtained according to the method of Zhang et al. (2016). Then, GFP signals of the conidia and hyphae of the transformants were examined under differential interference contrast optics and fluorescence on an optical microscope (AXIO Imager, Carl Zeiss, Microscopy GmbH, Göttingen, Germany) using a 100× objective. The images were photographed digitally with an AxioCam HR R3 camera (Carl Zeiss) using ZEN Blue Lite 2.3 software (10-2016). GFP expression in the transformants transformed with PYF11-GFP was monitored. To examine the overexpression of the CJPRB, CJPRB1, and CJCLN2-1 genes, total RNA was extracted from the mycelia from the SDAY plates. Each RNA sample was reverse transcribed to cDNA using a HiScript II Q RT SuperMix for qPCR (+gDNA wiper) kit (Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd). qRT–PCR analysis was performed using a SYBR Green Pro Taq HS qPCR kit (Accurate Biotech Co., Ltd) and primer pairs specific for the different genes (Supplementary Table 2) on an ABI Prism 7,900 system. The translation elongation factor 1-alpha (EF-1α) gene (MG 820547) of C. javanica was amplified as an internal control. The data were analyzed using the comparative threshold cycle (2−ΔΔCt) method (Vicente et al., 2015). The expression of CJPRB, CJPRB1, and CJCLN2-1 in the overexpression strain was compared with that in the WT strain.

Mycelial growth, sporulation, and conidial germination

Agar blocks (5 mm diameter) of different strains were inoculated on SDAY plates and grown for 11 days. The colony diameter was measured by the crisscross method every 2 days beginning on the third day, and the colony growth rate and colony diameter were calculated from 5 measurements. To determine the conidial yield, two 5-mm-diameter agar blocks were removed from each plate, placed in 1 ml of 0.1% (v/v) Tween 80, and vortexed well. The conidial yield was counted by a hemocytometer, and the number of conidia mm−2 was calculated. To determine the germination rate, 50 μl of conidial suspension (2 × 103 conidial ml−1) was deposited on a hydrophobic glass slide; the slide was placed in a Petri dish covered with moist filter paper, and conidial germination was examined by microscopy after 12 h of incubation at 25°C. All treatments were repeated at least three times.

Insect bioassays

Wild-type BE01 and transformants were grown on sterile cellophane (on the surface of SDAY medium) at 25°C for 15 days. The cellophane was then individually peeled off from each strain, and the conidia were eluted with 0.1% (v/v) aqueous Tween 80, followed by filtration through sterile cotton to remove any hyphae (Wang et al., 2019). Conidia were counted with a hemocytometer, and the concentration was adjusted to 1 × 106 conidia ml−1. The third instar larvae were immersed in conidial suspension (1 × 106 conidia ml−1) for 10 s and then placed on sterile filter paper to absorb excess suspension. The control groups were immersed in only 0.1% (v/v) aqueous Tween 80. Larvae were incubated for 15 days at 25 ± 2°C and 65 ± 5% RH with a 12:12 h L:D photoperiod. The poplar leaves used to feed H. cunea larvae were changed daily. Dead H. cunea larvae were placed in an empty Petri dish containing sterile water-soaked filter paper and incubated at 25 ± 2°C for observation, and the larvae covered with hyphae were recorded as dead. The dead larvae were counted daily, and the mortality induced by each strain was calculated after 15 days. The median mortality time (LT50) of the tested insects was calculated. There were 3 replicates per treatment, with 10 insects per replicate.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis of fungal transformants, fungal growth, sporulation, and spore germination data was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) in SPSS v.20 (IBM, Armonk, NY, United States). Statistical analysis of the mortality data was performed using the general linear model (GLM) in SPSS v.20 (IBM, Armonk, NY, United States). The LT50 was estimated by probit analysis of the time-mortality trend in each group. The significant differences between treatments were determined by multiple pairwise comparisons using Duncan’s multiple range test and Student’s t-test. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. The data are presented as the mean ± SE.

Results

Sensitivity of Cordyceps javanica BE01 to different concentrations of the aminoglycoside G418

The sensitivity of C. javanica BE01 to G418 was tested before transformation experiments. G418 resistance was chosen as a marker due to its successful application in fungal molecular genetics. We found that C. javanica BE01 did not grow at all in SDAY medium containing 800 μg ml−1 G418 (Figure 1), so a concentration of 800 μg ml−1 as the minimal inhibitory concentration was selected for transformant screening. The entire experiment was repeated three times.
Figure 1

Sensitivity of Cordyceps javanica BE01 protoplasts to G418. SDAY medium was supplemented with different concentrations of G418 (0–800 μg ml−1), and samples were incubated for 7 days at 25°C.

Sensitivity of Cordyceps javanica BE01 protoplasts to G418. SDAY medium was supplemented with different concentrations of G418 (0–800 μg ml−1), and samples were incubated for 7 days at 25°C.

Influence of PEG molecular weight and concentration on the transformation efficiency of Cordyceps javanica BE01

The positive transformants were observed to emit green fluorescence under a fluorescence microscope (Figure 2). The results showed that both the molecular weight and concentration of PEG had significant effects on the conversion efficiency of BE01 (F2, 14 = 5.456, p < 0.05; F5, 14 = 4.261, p < 0.05). The effects of different concentrations of PEG2000 on the conversion efficiency of BE01 were significantly different (F3, 8 = 7.066, p < 0.05). The transformation efficiency of BE01 mediated by 20% PEG2000 was significantly higher than that of other concentrations of PEG2000, and 14.00 ± 3.79 transformants were obtained, with a transformation efficiency of 7.00 ± 1.89 transformants μg−1 plasmid (Table 1). In addition, the effects of different concentrations of PEG4000 and PEG6000 on the conversion efficiency of BE01 were not significantly different (F3, 8 = 1.153, p > 0.05; F4, 10 = 0.286, p > 0.05). We also found that the conversion efficiency of the same concentration of PEG with different molecular weights did not differ significantly, except at a concentration of 20% (10%: F2, 6 = 0.333, p > 0.05; 20%: F3, 8 = 9.760, p < 0.05: 30%: F2, 6 = 4.159, p > 0.05; 40%: t = 1.061, df = 4, p > 0.05). The transformation efficiency with 20% PEG2000 was significantly higher than that with 20% PEG4000 and PEG6000, and the transformation efficiency with 30% PEG2000 was significantly higher than that with PEG4000 at the same concentration, reaching 5.67 ± 1.45 transformants; the overall transformation efficiency was 2.83 ± 0.73 transformants μg−1 plasmid (Table 1). Based on these findings, 20% PEG2000 was selected for subsequent experiments.
Figure 2

Conidia and hyphae of positive transformants under differential interference contrast and fluorescence microscopy (100× objective). Bar = 10 μm.

Table 1

Effects of different molecular weights and concentrations of polyethylene glycol (PEG) on the number of transformants (mean ± SE).

PEG concentration (m/v)Number of transformantsp-valuea
PEG2000PEG4000PEG6000
10%1.33 ± 0.670.67 ± 0.331.33 ± 0.88p > 0.05
20%14.00 ± 3.792.33 ± 1.200.67 ± 0.67p < 0.05
30%5.67 ± 1.451.00 ± 1.001.33 ± 1.33p > 0.05
40%0.33 ± 0.331.33 ± 0.88p > 0.05
50%1.67 ± 1.67
60%0.33 ± 0.33
p-valuebp < 0.05p > 0.05p > 0.05

Significance of the difference between the means in each row (p < 0.05 indicates a significant difference; 10–30%: Duncan’s multiple range test; 40%: Student’s t-test).

Significance of the difference between the means in each column (p < 0.05 indicates a significant difference, Duncan’s multiple range test).

Conidia and hyphae of positive transformants under differential interference contrast and fluorescence microscopy (100× objective). Bar = 10 μm. Effects of different molecular weights and concentrations of polyethylene glycol (PEG) on the number of transformants (mean ± SE). Significance of the difference between the means in each row (p < 0.05 indicates a significant difference; 10–30%: Duncan’s multiple range test; 40%: Student’s t-test). Significance of the difference between the means in each column (p < 0.05 indicates a significant difference, Duncan’s multiple range test).

Effects of protoplast recovery time and plasmid DNA amount on the transformation efficiency of Cordyceps javanica BE01

The transformation efficiency of C. javanica BE01 was significantly different among treatments with different recovery times (F3, 8 = 9.481, p < 0.05). The number of transformants obtained after 6 h of protoplast recovery was significantly higher than that after the other recovery times, reaching 24.67 ± 2.85 transformants, and the overall transformation efficiency was 12.33 ± 1.42 transformants μg−1 plasmid (Table 2). In addition, the transformation efficiency (7.50 ± 1.80 transformants μg−1 plasmid) of protoplasts recovered at 0 h was not significantly different from that of protoplasts recovered at 24 h (6.17 ± 0.60 transformants μg−1 plasmid) but was significantly higher than that of protoplasts recovered at 12 h (2.50 ± 1.15 transformants μg−1 plasmid) (Table 2). The numbers of transformants obtained by transformation of different amounts of plasma DNA into C. javanica BE01 protoplasts were significantly different (F2, 6 = 27.957, p < 0.05). The efficiency of transformation with 5 μg of plasmid was the highest, with a value of 4.07 ± 0.47 transformants μg−1 plasmid obtained, which was significantly higher than the transformation efficiencies obtained with 2 μg and 10 μg plasmid (Table 3).
Table 2

Effect of time of recovery on the number of transformants (mean ± SE).

Recovery time (h)Number of transformants
015.00 ± 3.61
624.67 ± 2.85
125.00 ± 2.31
2412.33 ± 1.20
p-valueap < 0.05

Significance of the difference between the means in each column (p < 0.05 indicates a significant difference, Duncan’s multiple range test).

Table 3

The effect of plasmid amount on the number of transformants (mean ± SE).

Plasmid DNA (μg)Number of transformants
24.00 ± 1.15
520.33 ± 2.33
108.00 ± 1.00
p-valueap < 0.05

The significance of the difference between the means in each column (p < 0.05 indicated a significant difference, Duncan’s multiple range test).

Effect of time of recovery on the number of transformants (mean ± SE). Significance of the difference between the means in each column (p < 0.05 indicates a significant difference, Duncan’s multiple range test). The effect of plasmid amount on the number of transformants (mean ± SE). The significance of the difference between the means in each column (p < 0.05 indicated a significant difference, Duncan’s multiple range test).

Growth, sporulation, and conidial germination of overexpression strains

The qRT–PCR results showed that the expression of CJPRB, CJPRB1, and CJCLN2-1 in the overexpression strains was upregulated 2.28 ± 0.10-, 3.15 ± 1.12-, and 48.44 ± 1.93-fold, respectively, compared with that in the WT strain, indicating that strains overexpressing the above three genes were successfully constructed (Figure 3A). The colony diameter, conidial yield and conidial germination rate of these three overexpression strains were not significantly different from those of the WT or PYF11-GFP transformed strains (colony diameter: F4, 15 = 0.768, p > 0.05; conidial yield: F4, 10 = 1.479, p > 0.05; conidial germination rate: F4, 10 = 0.283, p > 0.05) (Figures 3B–D). In addition, the abovementioned overexpression strains had no significant difference in growth rate from the WT and PYF11-GFP transformed strains (Table 4).
Figure 3

qRT–PCR and phenotype verification of CJPRB-, CJPRB1-, and CJCLN2-1-overexpressing BE01 strains. (A) Validation of overexpression strains by qRT–PCR. (B–D) Colony diameter, conidial production, and conidial germination rate of wild-type, PYF11-GFP-transformed, and overexpression strains of BE01 (mean ± SE). A common lowercase letter above the error bar is not significantly different (p>0.05, Duncan’s multiple range test).

Table 4

Regression equations of colony growth of different strains of C. javanica BE01 on SDAY medium (mean ± SE).

StrainGrowth regression equationGrowth rate (mm/d)Correlation coefficient
WTy = 4.264x + 13.6584.264 ± 0.3170.910
PYF11-GFPy = 4.501x + 13.6074.501 ± 0.1510.980
CJCLN2-1y = 4.768x + 13.054.768 ± 0.1440.984
CJPRB1y = 4.62x + 13.8634.62 ± 0.1590.979
CJPRBy = 4.54x + 14.3814.54 ± 0.1220.987
qRT–PCR and phenotype verification of CJPRB-, CJPRB1-, and CJCLN2-1-overexpressing BE01 strains. (A) Validation of overexpression strains by qRT–PCR. (B–D) Colony diameter, conidial production, and conidial germination rate of wild-type, PYF11-GFP-transformed, and overexpression strains of BE01 (mean ± SE). A common lowercase letter above the error bar is not significantly different (p>0.05, Duncan’s multiple range test). Regression equations of colony growth of different strains of C. javanica BE01 on SDAY medium (mean ± SE).

Contribution of CJPRB, CJPRB1, and CJCLN2-1 to the Virulence of Cordyceps javanica BE01

H. cunea larvae were treated with different strains overexpressing BE01 for 15 days, and the overall induced mortality rates did not differ significantly among the strains (F4, 10 = 1.019, p > 0.05) (Table 5 and Figure 4). However, the mortality induced between days 4 and 10 of infection differed significantly among strains (F4, 70 = 40.326, p < 0.05) (Figure 4). In particular, CJCLN2-1-and CJPRB1-overexpressing strains caused significantly higher mortality than the WT and PYF11-GFP-transformed strains within 4–10 days and 4–5 days of infection, respectively (F2, 42 = 74.353, p < 0.05; F2, 15 = 9.868, p < 0.05) (Figure 4). In addition, there were significant differences in LT50 among different BE01 strains (F4, 10 = 12.931, p < 0.05) (Table 5). The LT50 values of CJCLN2-1 and CJPRB1-overexpressing strains were significantly lower than those of the WT and CJPRB-overexpressing strains, with values of 5.18 ± 0.80 days and 5.01 ± 0.57 days, respectively (Table 5).
Table 5

Insect bioassay of C. javanica wild-type transformant strains (mean ± SE).

StrainMortality rate (%)LT50 (d)
Control00
WT70.00 ± 11.5511.08 ± 0.52
PYF11-GFP80.00 ± 5.779.89 ± 1.00
CJPRB83.33 ± 3.338.39 ± 0.83
CJPRB166.67 ± 8.825.01 ± 0.57
CJCLN2-183.33 ± 6.675.18 ± 0.80
p-valueap > 0.05p < 0.05

Significance of the difference between the means in each column (p < 0.05 indicates a significant difference, Duncan’s multiple range test).

LT50, median mortality time of the tested insects.

Figure 4

Cumulative mortality (mean ± SE) of H. cunea larvae in response to different types of C. javanica BE01 strains over 15 days. Cumulative mortality (mean ± SE) of H. cunea larvae (left) and dead larvae covered with mycelia (right).

Insect bioassay of C. javanica wild-type transformant strains (mean ± SE). Significance of the difference between the means in each column (p < 0.05 indicates a significant difference, Duncan’s multiple range test). LT50, median mortality time of the tested insects. Cumulative mortality (mean ± SE) of H. cunea larvae in response to different types of C. javanica BE01 strains over 15 days. Cumulative mortality (mean ± SE) of H. cunea larvae (left) and dead larvae covered with mycelia (right).

Discussion

The establishment of genetic transformation systems for EPFs provides a basis for studying their pathogenic mechanisms and constructing genetically modified strains. The first step for constructing a genetic transformation system is to choose an appropriate dominant selection marker. Next, the minimum inhibitory concentration of the selection agent required to prevent the growth of nontransformed cells and selection of false transformants must be determined (Lim et al., 2021). The aminoglycoside G418 is widely used as a selection marker in transformation systems in fungi, plants, and mammals (Itaya et al., 2018; He et al., 2020; Huang et al., 2020). Therefore, in our study, G418 was chosen as the selection marker, and 800 μg ml−1 G418 was determined to be the lowest concentration that could reliably inhibit the growth of C. javanica BE01. The PEG-mediated protoplast transformation method is the most commonly used method for the genetic transformation of filamentous fungi. This method consists of three main steps: protoplast acquisition, uptake of transforming plasmids, and growth of transformants on selective media (Liu and Friesen, 2012). In these protocols, cell wall-degrading enzymes (CWDEs) (mainly cellulase, Driselase from Trichoderma sp., lysing enzyme, 1,3-glucanase, and chitinase) are used to degrade the cell wall of fungal hyphae or germinated spores to successfully obtain high concentrations of protoplasts, which is a prerequisite for PEG-mediated protoplast transformation (Wei et al., 2010; Liu and Friesen, 2012; Wang et al., 2018; Lim et al., 2021; Liu et al., 2021). Shimizu et al. found that lysis of Paecilomyces fumosoroseus mycelia for 3 h with 10 mg ml−1 driselase or 1 mg ml−1 chitinase produced 2.6 × 107 protoplasts ml−1 or 7.6 × 106 protoplasts ml−1, respectively (Shimizu et al., 1989). In addition, a study by Ranga et al. showed that 3.0 × 107 protoplasts ml−1 could be obtained by incubating Metarhizium anisopliae mycelia with 9 mg ml−1 lysing enzyme for 3 h (Ranga and Saini, 2011). However, mixed enzymes usually yield better results than single enzymes. For example, incubating M. anisopliae mycelia with 6 mg ml−1 driselase, novozyme and zymolyase for 3 h yielded 1.2 × 108 protoplasts ml−1 (Shi and Shimizu, 1996). Therefore, in this study, the protoplasts of C. javanica were treated with mixed enzymes (3 mg ml−1 lysing enzyme, 7 mg ml−1 driselase, and 0.5 mg ml−1 chitinase), and protoplasts were obtained at a concentration of 1.31 × 107 protoplasts ml−1, which was sufficient for use in subsequent experiments. Protoplast uptake of exogenous DNA is achieved by incubating protoplasts with DNA followed by incubation with a solution containing CaCl2 and PEG (Liu and Friesen, 2012; Amalamol et al., 2022). The molecular weight and concentration of PEG affect the conversion efficiency (Li et al., 2017; Amalamol et al., 2022). Previous studies have shown that low-molecular-weight PEG has a better effect than high-molecular-weight PEG, and most results indicate that high concentrations of PEG have a better effect than low concentrations of PEG (Becker and Lundblad, 1994; Li et al., 2017). We found that, consistent with existing reports, the conversion efficiency of PEG2000 (low molecular weight) was higher than that of PEG4000 and PEG6000 (high molecular weight). One difference in our study was that a lower concentration of PEG2000 (20%) resulted in a higher conversion efficiency; this difference may be related to interspecies differences. Therefore, we chose 20% PEG2000 as the PEG molecular weight and concentration for the transformation of C. javanica BE01. The amount of DNA in the transformation reaction is another factor that affects transformation efficiency (Amalamol et al., 2022). However, there are differences in the relationship between DNA quantity and transformation efficiency among different species. Díaz et al. (2019) found that 3 μg of DNA transformed Pseudogymnoascus verrucosus more efficiently than 5 μg or 10 μg of DNA. In contrast, Wang et al. (2018) showed that the transformation efficiency of Gaeumannomyces tritici with 6 μg of DNA was higher than that with 4 μg or 8 μg of DNA. Our results showed that the transformation efficiency of C. javanica BE01 was higher with 5 μg of DNA than with 2 μg or 10 μg of DNA. Following PEG treatment, the protoplast mixture usually needs to recover in regeneration medium before the protoplast mixture is cultured on selective medium (Liu and Friesen, 2012). The optimum recovery time also varies among species. It has been reported that Pleurotus ostreatus protoplasts need to recover for 18–24 h before they can be cultured on selective media, while P. verrucosus protoplasts must be allowed to recover for 24 h before transformants can be obtained (Li et al., 2006; Díaz et al., 2019). Our results showed that the protoplast mixture could be cultured on selective medium with the highest transformation efficiency after 6 h of recovery. Proteases secreted by EPFs are considered key virulence factors that allow fungi to penetrate the insect epidermis (Wang et al., 2013). Among the enzymes secreted during fungal invasion, subtilisin-like Pr1 proteases have attracted considerable attention over the past few decades because of their potential roles in causing fungal disease and death in the host (Gao et al., 2020). The protease Pr1A, which is widely recognized to play an important role in degrading insect cuticles, has been suggested as a possible candidate for the development of advanced engineered biopesticides (Zhang et al., 2008). In this study, we overexpressed CJPRB (Pr1A) through the abovementioned PEG-mediated protoplast transformation system, which enhanced the virulence of C. javanica BE01, shortening its LT50 by 25.28% compared with that of the WT strain. Similar to our results, the LT50 of Pr1A-overexpressing M. anisopliae against Manduca sexta was 25% shorter than that of the WT strain (St Leger et al., 1996). However, the LT50 of B. bassiana against Myzus persicae was only 11% shorter than that of the WT strain (Fan et al., 2010). The above results clearly show that overexpressing CJPRB in C. javanica BE01 shortens the LT50 significantly more than overexpressing Pr1A in B. bassiana. In addition, another subtilisin-like protease of this family, Pr1H, may also play a role in infection by fungal pathogens. Wang et al. (2013) found that the Pr1H gene of C. farinosa was upregulated 11-fold after induction for 12 h in medium supplemented with cuticle material. Other studies have shown that Pr1H is activated 6 h after M. anisopliae infection of Diaphorina citri and remains active until 144 h of infection (Rosas-García et al., 2018). Interestingly, Pr1A is not activated during the entire infection process (Rosas-García et al., 2018). The above results indicate that the Pr1H protease may play a certain role in the infection process of EPFs. Therefore, we overexpressed CJPRB1 (Pr1H) in C. javanica BE01 and found that the virulence of the strain was enhanced, as its LT50 increased by 54.78% compared with that of the WT strain. The above results indicate that there are differences in the expression pattern and degree of action of Pr1 proteins among different species. In addition to the important role of the Pr1 protease in fungal infection, recent studies have shown that the acidic environmental hydrolase tripeptidyl peptidase (CLN2), belonging to the S53serine protease family, which is widely present in entomopathogens of Cordycipitaceae, plays a role in its pathogenicity in insects (the hemolymph of most insects is weakly acidic) (Wyatt et al., 1956; Stumpf et al., 2017; Lin et al., 2019). Studies have shown that CLN2 is upregulated by more than 15,000-fold after 48 h of C. javanica IJ1G infection; CLN2 also tends to be upregulated during B. bassiana infection (Tartar and Boucias, 2004; Lin et al., 2019). Our results showed that the LT50 of the CJCLN2-1 overexpressing strain against H. cunea was shortened by 53.25% compared with that of the WT strain, indicating that the CJCLN2-1 protease dose impacts the fungal infection process. In our study, strains overexpressing CJPRB, CJPRB1, and CJCLN2-1 were not significantly different from the WT strain in terms of colony growth, conidial yield or conidial germination rate. Our results showed that the mortality of the CJPRB1-overexpressing strain was significantly higher than that of the WT strain at 4–5 days after infection. This may be because CJPRB1 overexpression enhanced the efficiency of fungal penetration into the insect cuticle and accelerated the fungal infection rate. Similarly, Lecanicillium lecanii expressing the Pr1A gene from B. bassiana showed no significant differences from the WT strain in colony growth, conidial yield, and conidial germination rate (Zhang et al., 2016). The Pr1A-expressing strain exhibited a lower survival rate for Aphis gossypii within 3–5.5 days of infestation than the WT strain (Zhang et al., 2016). Moreover, studies have shown that the Pr1 protease can degrade insect immunity proteins and detoxification proteins in the hemolymph, thereby reducing insect immunity and accelerating fungal infection (Gillespie et al., 2000). The mortality of H. cunea caused by overexpression of the CJCLN2-1 strain was higher than that caused by the WT strain between 4 and 10 days of infection, indicating that CJCLN2-1 protease may play a long-term role in fungal infection. Lin et al. also found that CLN2 was upregulated throughout the C. javanica IJ1G infection process (Lin et al., 2019). In conclusion, our study is the first to report the genetic transformation system of C. javanica, providing technical support for subsequent research on virulence-related genes. In addition, we confirmed by an insect biology assay that the subtilisin-like proteases CJPRB and CJPRB1 and tripeptidyl peptidase CJCLN2-1 contribute to the virulence of C. javanica, specifically by shortening the LT50 of H. cunea larvae. This provides a theoretical basis for the subsequent targeted induction of related protein expression to further improve the virulence of C. javanica. However, there remain limitations in the use of transgenic strains. The safety risks of the use of transgenic EPFs are associated mainly with ecological effects. These mainly include nontarget effects, gene drift potential, ecological adaptability, adaptability to environmental stress and diffusion capability. In China, before commercialization, genetically modified microbial preparations generally have to go through four stages of experimental research, intermediate testing, environmental release, and safety production testing and can only undergo a variety of verification after the researchers apply for agricultural genetically modified organism safety certificates. Therefore, there remain mainly hurdles before the commercialization of transgenic strains.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/, OM468894, OM468895, and OM468896.

Author contributions

WW participated in the study design, acquisition of data, and analysis and interpretation of data. YW participated in the acquisition of data. GD and FC supervised the experiments and critically read the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFD0600104).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
  35 in total

1.  Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of the entomopathogenic fungus Nomuraea rileyi.

Authors:  Changwen Shao; Youping Yin; Zhaoran Qi; Ren Li; Zhangyong Song; Yan Li; Zhongkang Wang
Journal:  Fungal Genet Biol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.495

Review 2.  Can fungal biopesticides control malaria?

Authors:  Matthew B Thomas; Andrew F Read
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 60.633

3.  Introduction of DNA into yeast cells.

Authors:  D M Becker; V Lundblad
Journal:  Curr Protoc Mol Biol       Date:  2001-05

4.  Biochemical and molecular characterization of wild-type and fused protoplasts of Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae.

Authors:  V Ranga; Gurvinder Kaur Saini
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 2.099

5.  Insect pathogenic fungus interacts with the gut microbiota to accelerate mosquito mortality.

Authors:  Ge Wei; Yiling Lai; Guandong Wang; Huan Chen; Fang Li; Sibao Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Species clarification of Isaria isolates used as biocontrol agents against Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Liviidae) in Mexico.

Authors:  Adrien Gallou; María G Serna-Domínguez; Angélica M Berlanga-Padilla; Miguel A Ayala-Zermeño; Marco A Mellín-Rosas; Roberto Montesinos-Matías; Hugo C Arredondo-Bernal
Journal:  Fungal Biol       Date:  2015-12-17

7.  A pilot-scale expressed sequence tag analysis of Beauveria bassiana gene expression reveals a tripeptidyl peptidase that is differentially expressed in vivo.

Authors:  Aurélien Tartar; Drion G Boucias
Journal:  Mycopathologia       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.574

8.  Two dominant selectable markers for genetic manipulation in Neurospora crassa.

Authors:  Lingaonan He; Wei Guo; Jiuqi Li; Yuanhao Meng; Ying Wang; Huiqiang Lou; Qun He
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 3.886

9.  A highly efficient stratagem for protoplast isolation and genetic transformation in filamentous fungus Colletotrichum falcatum.

Authors:  Dharmaraj Amalamol; N M R Ashwin; Kana Valiyaveettil Lakshana; M Nirmal Bharathi; Amalraj Ramesh Sundar; Rajeev K Sukumaran; Palaniyandi Malathi; Rasappa Viswanathan
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.099

10.  Natural variation in virulence of the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana against malaria mosquitoes.

Authors:  Claudio A Valero-Jiménez; Alfons J M Debets; Jan A L van Kan; Sijmen E Schoustra; Willem Takken; Bas J Zwaan; Constantianus J M Koenraadt
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 2.979

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.