| Literature DB >> 36118236 |
Qianqian Zhang1, Jian Li1, Xin Yi2, Zipeng Li1, Shuang Liang3, Zhengfeng Fang1, Yan Lin1, Shengyu Xu1, Bin Feng1, Yong Zhuo1, Lianqiang Che1.
Abstract
The effects of Rhodotorula benthica culture (RBC) and antibiotics (AB) on the growth performance, nutrients digestibility, morphological indicators, and colonic microbiota of weaning piglets were explored. Ninety-six (Duroc × Landrace × Large) weaned piglets (21-day-old) weighing 7.7 ± 0.83 kg, were randomly allocated to 4 dietary treatments. They were fed with basal diet (CON), basal diet + 25 mg/kg bacitracin zinc + 5 mg/kg colistin sulfate (AB), 5 g/kg reduction in soybean meal of basal diet + 5 g/kg RBC (RBC1), or 10 g/kg reduction in soybean meal of basal diet + 10 g/kg RBC (RBC2). The results showed that dietary RBC1 improved the body gain/feed intake (G/F) of weaned piglets than the CON diet, and the RBC2 diet improved the average daily gain and G/F than CON and AB diets from days 15 to 28 (P < 0.05). Supplementation of RBC2 improved the apparent total tract digestibility of dry matter, nitrogen, and gross energy in weaned piglets compared to controls from days 15 to 28 (P < 0.05). Dietary AB, RBC1, and RBC2 enhanced the ileal villus height (VH) and VH/crypt depth (CD), and these two indicators were greater in the RBC2-treated piglets than in the AB- and RBC1-treated piglets (P < 0.05). The activity of serum superoxide dismutase (SOD) was enhanced by dietary AB, RBC1, and RBC2 (P < 0.05). Serum glutathione (GSH) concentration was elevated by dietary RBC1 and RBC2 (P < 0.05). According to 16S rRNA sequence analysis, AB- and RBC2-treated piglets had a higher relative abundance of Firmicutes and Lachnospiraceae in the colon digesta, and more abundant Lactobacillus was found in RBC1-treated piglets, as compared to the CON group. Additionally, RBC2 supplementation increased the α diversity [Chao1, PD-whole-tree, and observed operational taxonomic units (OTUs)] compared to the CON group. Taken together, the dietary RBC improved the growth performance of weaned piglets. In addition, 10 g/kg of RBC2 in the diet achieved better effects on higher ADG, ileal villi morphology, and stronger antioxidant capacity than dietary AB and RBC1 in weaning piglets.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidant property; growth performance; intestinal morphology; microbiota community; nutrients digestibility; weaning piglets
Year: 2022 PMID: 36118236 PMCID: PMC9479635 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.964531
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 6.064
Ingredients and composition of basal diet.
|
|
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Corn | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 38.16 | 38.16 | 38.16 | 38.16 |
| Extruded corn | 17.99 | 17.99 | 17.99 | 17.99 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Soybean meal | 10.40 | 10.40 | 9.90 | 9.40 | 18.04 | 18.04 | 17.54 | 17.04 |
| Extruded soybean | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Extruded wheat | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Extruded rice | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Fish meal | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| SDPP | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | – | – | – | – |
| Whey powder | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| Soy oil | 1.86 | 1.86 | 1.86 | 1.86 | 2.07 | 2.07 | 2.07 | 2.07 |
| CaHPO3 | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.54 |
| Limestone | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.83 |
| Bacitracin Zinc | 0 | 0.0025 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0025 | 0 | 0 |
| Colistin sulfate | 0 | 0.0005 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0005 | 0 | 0 |
| RBC | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | 1 |
| Salt | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| L-lysine HCl | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.36 |
| DL-Methionine | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 |
| L-Threonine | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| L-Tryptophan | – | – | – | – | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| Vitamin/trace element Premix | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | – | – | – | – |
| Vitamin/trace element Premix | – | – | – | – | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Calculated nutrient composition, % | ||||||||
| NE, kcal/kg | 2,596 | 2,596 | 2,594 | 2,591 | 2,570 | 2,570 | 2,567 | 2,565 |
| CP | 20.03 | 20.03 | 20.05 | 20.07 | 19.78 | 19.78 | 19.80 | 19.82 |
| Ca | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| Available phosphorus | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Calculated standardized ideal digestible value, % | ||||||||
| d-Lys | 1.20 | 1.20 | 1.20 | 1.20 | 1.18 | 1.18 | 1.18 | 1.18 |
| d-Met | 0.39 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.6 |
| d-Thr | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.73 |
| d-Trp | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Analyzed nutrient values, % | ||||||||
| DE, MJ/kg | 14.91 | 14.91 | 14.94 | 14.96 | 14.73 | 14.72 | 14.80 | 14.81 |
| CP | 20.11 | 20.10 | 20.13 | 20.15 | 19.82 | 19.82 | 19.88 | 19.87 |
| Lys | 1.32 | 1.32 | 1.35 | 1.37 | 1.30 | 1.30 | 1.34 | 1.35 |
| Met+Cys | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.60 | 0.61 | 0.63 |
Provided per kg of complete diet: vitamin A, 2,200 IU; vitamin D3, 220 IU; vitamin E, 16 IU; vitamin K3, 0.5 mg; vitamin B12, 0.0175 mg; riboflavin, 3.5 mg; niacin, 30 mg; thiamine, 10 mg; choline, 500 mg; folic acid, 0.3 mg; vitamin B1, 1 mg; vitamin B6, 7 mg; biotin, 0.05 mg; Zn (as ZnSO4), 100 mg; Mn (as MnO2), 4 mg; Fe (as FeSO4·7H2O), 100 mg; Cu (as CuSO4·5H2O), 6 mg; I (as KI), 0.14 mg; Se (as Na2SeO3·5H2O), 0.3 mg.
Provided per kg of complete diet: vitamin A, 1,750 IU; vitamin D3, 220 IU; vitamin E, 11 IU; vitamin K3, 0.5 mg; riboflavin, 3 mg; niacin, 30 mg; thiamine, 1 mg; d-pantothenic, 9 mg; choline, 400 mg; vitamin B12, 15 μg; folic acid, 0.3 mg; vitamin B6, 3 mg; biotin, 0.05 mg; Zn (as ZnSO4), 80 mg; Mn (as MnO2), 3 mg; Fe (as FeSO4·7H2O), 100 mg; Cu (as CuSO4·5H2O), 5 mg; I (as KI), 0.14 mg; Se (as Na2SeO3·5H2O), 0.25 mg.
Effect of dietary RBC and AB supplementation on the growth performance of weaning piglets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| BW, kg | |||||||||||
| Day 0 | 7.75 | 7.69 | 7.69 | 7.70 | 0.37 | 0.910 | 0.915 | 0.930 | 0.995 | 0.980 | 0.985 |
| Day 14 | 10.41 | 10.76 | 10.60 | 10.72 | 0.46 | 0.595 | 0.775 | 0.639 | 0.804 | 0.950 | 0.853 |
| Day 28 | 16.83 | 17.40 | 17.78 | 18.30 | 0.63 | 0.534 | 0.304 | 0.117 | 0.678 | 0.326 | 0.565 |
| Day1–14 | |||||||||||
| ADG, g/d | 190 | 220 | 208 | 216 | 21 | 0.327 | 0.556 | 0.394 | 0.688 | 0.894 | 0.788 |
| ADFI, g/d | 265 | 292 | 290 | 295 | 24 | 0.447 | 0.476 | 0.393 | 0.962 | 0.923 | 0.886 |
| G/F | 0.728 | 0.741 | 0.723 | 0.734 | 0.040 | 0.814 | 0.928 | 0.914 | 0.745 | 0.898 | 0.843 |
| Day 15–28 | |||||||||||
| ADG, g/d | 458 | 474 | 513 | 541 | 23 | 0.638 | 0.108 | 0.018 | 0.243 | 0.049 | 0.381 |
| ADFI, g/d | 721 | 747 | 714 | 727 | 50 | 0.709 | 0.937 | 0.931 | 0.652 | 0.774 | 0.869 |
| G/F | 0.638 | 0.649 | 0.724 | 0.750 | 0.028 | 0.772 | 0.039 | 0.010 | 0.070 | 0.019 | 0.525 |
| Day 1–28 | |||||||||||
| ADG, g/d | 324 | 347 | 360 | 379 | 17 | 0.362 | 0.152 | 0.035 | 0.583 | 0.200 | 0.452 |
| ADFI, g/d | 493 | 519 | 502 | 511 | 32 | 0.559 | 0.832 | 0.691 | 0.709 | 0.850 | 0.853 |
| G/F | 0.661 | 0.674 | 0.724 | 0.743 | 0.019 | 0.623 | 0.032 | 0.007 | 0.086 | 0.020 | 0.481 |
Pooled standard error of means, n = 6.
Effect of dietary RBC and AB supplementation on the diarrhea score of weaning piglets (%).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Day 0–14 | 0.222 | 0.344 | 0.249 | 0.189 | 0.155 | 0.584 | 0.903 | 0.881 | 0.670 | 0.487 | 0.786 |
| Day 15–28 | 0.753 | 0.523 | 0.524 | 0.429 | 0.135 | 0.243 | 0.243 | 0.104 | 0.999 | 0.624 | 0.624 |
| Day 0–28 | 0.488 | 0.434 | 0.386 | 0.309 | 0.113 | 0.739 | 0.532 | 0.276 | 0.769 | 0.443 | 0.634 |
Pooled standard error of means, n = 6.
Effect of dietary RBC and AB supplementation on nutrients digestibility of weaning piglets (%).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Day 1–14 | |||||||||||
| DM | 81.40 | 83.18 | 82.28 | 82.45 | 0.60 | 0.047 | 0.307 | 0.226 | 0.300 | 0.398 | 0.843 |
| N | 81.79 | 83.05 | 83.37 | 83.18 | 0.76 | 0.255 | 0.158 | 0.210 | 0.771 | 0.905 | 0.864 |
| GE | 79.80 | 81.80 | 81.06 | 83.29 | 0.98 | 0.162 | 0.373 | 0.020 | 0.596 | 0.295 | 0.122 |
| Day 15–28 | |||||||||||
| DM | 77.36 | 80.67 | 81.50 | 82.22 | 0.90 | 0.017 | 0.004 | 0.001 | 0.526 | 0.237 | 0.573 |
| N | 78.19 | 79.39 | 80.27 | 82.36 | 1.12 | 0.458 | 0.206 | 0.016 | 0.587 | 0.076 | 0.202 |
| GE | 77.51 | 78.50 | 80.38 | 81.90 | 1.17 | 0.559 | 0.101 | 0.016 | 0.274 | 0.055 | 0.370 |
Pooled standard error of means, n = 6.
Effect of dietary RBC and AB supplementation on the intestinal morphology of weaning piglets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Duodenum | |||||||||||
| VH, μm | 373.17 | 381.00 | 367.17 | 378.83 | 4.47 | 0.229 | 0.353 | 0.380 | 0.041 | 0.735 | 0.078 |
| CD, μm | 242.00 | 236.50 | 243.33 | 239.33 | 3.41 | 0.267 | 0.785 | 0.586 | 0.172 | 0.563 | 0.416 |
| V/C ratio | 1.54 | 1.61 | 1.51 | 1.58 | 0.02 | 0.051 | 0.369 | 0.252 | 0.007 | 0.382 | 0.049 |
| Jejunum | |||||||||||
| VH, μm | 320.17 | 330.33 | 320.83 | 327.67 | 5.63 | 0.216 | 0.934 | 0.358 | 0.247 | 0.741 | 0.401 |
| CD, μm | 172.67 | 171.17 | 166.17 | 163.67 | 3.43 | 0.721 | 0.196 | 0.079 | 0.316 | 0.138 | 0.613 |
| V/C ratio | 1.86 | 1.93 | 1.93 | 2.01 | 0.05 | 0.263 | 0.261 | 0.029 | 0.996 | 0.243 | 0.245 |
| Ileum | |||||||||||
| VH, μm | 279.33 | 318.83 | 321.67 | 351.00 | 3.58 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.582 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| CD, μm | 153.00 | 149.67 | 156.33 | 146.83 | 2.84 | 0.417 | 0.417 | 0.141 | 0.113 | 0.489 | 0.028 |
| V/C ratio | 1.83 | 2.14 | 2.06 | 2.42 | 0.05 | 0.013 | <0.001 | 0.002 | 0.246 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Pooled standard error of means, n = 7.
Effect of RBC and AB supplementation on the blood profiles of weaning piglets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Day 14 | |||||||||||
| IgG, μg/L | 2.62 | 2.85 | 2.80 | 3.24 | 0.23 | 0.475 | 0.581 | 0.069 | 0.869 | 0.249 | 0.191 |
| IgM, μg/L | 0.198 | 0.298 | 0.272 | 0.338 | 0.07 | 0.301 | 0.446 | 0.154 | 0.780 | 0.676 | 0.488 |
| WBC, 109 /L | 23.02 | 21.67 | 22.48 | 21.56 | 0.74 | 0.210 | 0.612 | 0.178 | 0.444 | 0.921 | 0.389 |
| LYM, % | 73.82 | 74.28 | 74.18 | 76.15 | 2.09 | 0.876 | 0.903 | 0.439 | 0.973 | 0.535 | 0.513 |
| Day 28 | |||||||||||
| IgG, μg/L | 4.20 | 4.23 | 4.67 | 4.40 | 0.42 | 0.960 | 0.435 | 0.687 | 0.464 | 0.720 | 0.702 |
| IgM, μg/L | 0.22 | 0.25 | 0.28 | 0.37 | 0.02 | 0.380 | 0.114 | 0.172 | 0.459 | 0.609 | 0.816 |
| WBC, 109 /L | 23.85 | 24.25 | 23.17 | 22.47 | 1.94 | 0.886 | 0.808 | 0.621 | 0.699 | 0.525 | 0.801 |
| LYM, % | 15.22 | 15.95 | 15.07 | 15.69 | 1.66 | 0.757 | 0.949 | 0.843 | 0.709 | 0.911 | 0.793 |
Pooled standard error of means, n = 6.
Effect of dietary RBC and AB supplementation on serum antioxidant properties of weaning piglets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Day 14 | |||||||||||
| GSH, ug/mL | 613.11 | 598.41 | 653.35 | 711.85 | 6.48 | 0.124 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
| MDA, nmol/mL | 6.78 | 6.25 | 6.26 | 6.35 | 0.31 | 0.239 | 0.247 | 0.332 | 0.985 | 0.829 | 0.844 |
| SOD, U/mL | 98.77 | 108.79 | 101.84 | 110.21 | 1.78 | 0.001 | 0.236 | < 0.001 | 0.012 | 0.577 | 0.003 |
| Day 28 | |||||||||||
| GSH, ug/mL | 595.50 | 602.19 | 673.85 | 663.03 | 3.67 | 0.158 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.051 |
| MDA, nmol/mL | 6.55 | 6.05 | 6.41 | 6.46 | 0.17 | 0.055 | 0.570 | 0.735 | 0.159 | 0.105 | 0.818 |
| SOD, U/mL | 104.82 | 106.55 | 113.70 | 106.40 | 1.55 | 0.440 | 0.001 | 0.480 | 0.004 | 0.946 | 0.003 |
Pooled standard error of means, n = 6.
Figure 1Effect of dietary RBC and antibiotics (AB) supplementation on the α and β diversity in the colonic digesta of weaning piglets. (A–F) Goods-coverage, Shannon, Simpson, ACE, Chao1, and Ph-whole tree indices of α diversity. n = 7 for each treatment. CON, basal diet; AB, basal diet + 25 mg/kg bacitracin zinc+5 mg/kg colistin sulfate; RBC1, 5 g/kg reduction in soybean meal of basal diet +5 g/kg RBC; RBC2, 10 g/kg reduction in soybean meal of basal diet +10 g/kg RBC. *Means P < 0.05.
Figure 2Effect of dietary AB and RBC on the relative abundance of microbiota at the phylum and genus level, and PCoA and Adonism of weaned piglets. (A) Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) number in each treatment group. (B) Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA). (C) Analysis of similarities (ANOSIM) between CON and RBC2 group. (D) Microbiota abundance at the phyla level. (E) Microbiota abundance at the genus level. n = 7 for each treatment. CON, basal diet; AB, basal diet + 25 mg/kg bacitracin zinc+5 mg/kg colistin sulfate; RBC1, 5 g/kg reduction in soybean meal of basal diet + 5 g/kg RBC; RBC2, 10 g/kg reduction in soybean meal of basal diet + 10 g/kg RBC. *Means P < 0.05.
Figure 3LEfSe analysis of digesta microbiota. (A) CON vs. AB group, (B) CON vs. RBC1 group, (C) CON vs. RBC2 group, (D) AB vs. RBC1group, (E) AB vs. RBC2 group, (F) RBC1 vs. RBC2 group. n = 7 for each treatment. CON, basal diet; AB, basal diet + 25 mg/kg bacitracin zinc+5 mg/kg colistin sulfate; RBC1, 5 g/kg reduction in soybean meal of basal diet +5 g/kg RBC; RBC2, 10 g/kg reduction in soybean meal of basal diet +10 g/kg RBC.