| Literature DB >> 36118235 |
Tianwen Huang1,2,3, Yaoyu Pu1,2,3, Xiangpeng Wang1,2,3, Yanhong Li1,2,3, Hang Yang1,2,3, Yubin Luo1,2,3, Yi Liu1,2,3.
Abstract
Spondyloarthritis (SpA) is a group of rheumatic diseases that cause joint inflammation. Accumulating studies have focused on the metabolomic profiling of SpA in recent years. We conducted a systematic review to provide a collective summary of previous findings on metabolomic profiling associated with SpA. We systematically searched PubMed, Medline, Embase and Web of Science for studies on comparisons of the metabolomic analysis of SpA patients and non-SpA controls. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of the included articles. From 482 records identified, 31 studies were included in the analysis. A number of metabolites were differentially distributed between SpA and non-SpA cases. SpA patients showed higher levels of glucose, succinic acid, malic acid and lactate in carbohydrate metabolism, higher glycerol levels and lower fatty acid (especially unsaturated fatty acid) levels in lipid metabolism, and lower levels of tryptophan and glutamine in amino acid metabolism than healthy controls. Both conventional and biological therapy of SpA can insufficiently reverse the aberrant metabolism state toward that of the controls. However, the differences in the results of metabolic profiling between patients with SpA and other inflammatory diseases as well as among patients with several subtypes of SpA are inconsistent across studies. Studies on metabolomics have provided insights into etiological factors and biomarkers for SpA. Supplementation with the metabolites that exhibit decreased levels, such as short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), has good treatment prospects for modulating immunity. Further studies are needed to elucidate the role of disordered metabolic molecules in the pathogenesis of SpA.Entities:
Keywords: ankylosing spondylitis; biomarkers; dysbiosis; metabolomics; spondyloarthritis
Year: 2022 PMID: 36118235 PMCID: PMC9479008 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.965709
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 6.064
FIGURE 1Flow diagram of study selection and data collection process.
Characteristics of studies included in the systematic review.
| Study | Region | Sample type | Analytical technique | SpA group | Control group | ||||||||
| Subtype (No.) | Male/female | Age (yr) | Disease duration (yr) | CRP (mg/L) | ESR (mm/h) | BASDAI | Control (No.) | Male/female | Age (yr) | ||||
|
| |||||||||||||
|
| United | Colon biopsies | LC-MS | axSpA (21) CD-axSpA (12) | axSpA 11/10 CD-axSpA 5/7 | axSpA 44.9 ± 12.1 CD-axSpA 51.4 ± 11.1 | axSpA 9.9 ± 9.8 CD-axSpA 11.9 ± 8.0 | NR | NR | axSpA 4.8 ± 2.4 CD-axSpA 5.1 ± 2.2 | HC (24) CD (27) | HC 12/12 CD 14/13 | HC 45.2 ± 11.8 CD 35.1 ± 18.1 |
|
| India | Serum | 1H NMR | SpA (81) | 71/10 | 31.0 (23.0, 39.5) | 6.0 (3.0, 12.0) | 31.7 (4.3, 68.0) | 60.0 (30.5, 92.5) | 4.6 (2.6, 5.8) | HC (87) | 72/14 | 32.2 ± 6.0 |
|
| |||||||||||||
|
| China | Plasma | LC-MS and GC-MS | AS (15) | 15/0 | 20.5 (7.0, 50.0) | At least 6 months | NR | NR | NR | HC (24) | Match with SpA groups | Match with SpA groups |
|
| United | Serum | LC-MS | AS (18) | 17/1 | 39.9 ± 12.8 | NR | 32.7 ± 37.3 | 42.0 ± 24.5 | 6.8 ± 1.9 | HC (9) | 8/1 | 40.9 ± 11.4 |
|
| China | Serum | GC-TOF MS and UPLC-QTOF MS | AS (27) | 27/0 | 31.0 (18.0, 55.0) | NR | 13.9 ± 23.9 | 34.7 ± 26.2 | NR | RA (27) OA (27) Gout (33) HC (60) | RA 0/27 OA 0/27 Gout 33/0 HC 30/30 | RA 53.0 (40.0, 68.0) OA 58.0 (39.0, 73.0) Gout 51.0 (30.0, 69.0) HC 34.0 (25.0, 74.0) |
|
| China | Serum | GC-MS | AS (33) | 22/11 | 30.9 ± 7.8 | At least 6 months | NR | NR | NR | HC (33) | 19/14 | 33.9 ± 8.5 |
|
| China | Feces | 1H NMR | AS (40) | 24/16 | 34.0 ± 9.6 | NR | 7.6 ± 5.2 | 12.1 ± 8.7 | NR | HC (34) RA (35) | HC 19/15 RA 10/25 | HC 31.6 ± 10.2 RA 39.8 ± 7.9 |
|
| China | Plasma, Urine, ligament tissue | 1H NMR | AS 44 | 38/6 | 31.8 ± 10.9 | 6.8 ± 3.5 | NR | NR | 3.2 ± 1.8 | HC (44) | 38/6 | 33.8 ± 9.7 |
|
| China | Feces | GC-MS | AS (49) | 26/23 | 43.0 ± 9.6 | NR | 8.7 ± 5.2 | 13.6 ± 8.7 | 3.7 ± 2.1 | HC (38) | 20/18 | 43.1 ± 8.5 |
|
| China | Serum | UPLC-TQ-MS | AS (30) | 20/10 | 34.0 (24.0, 46.0) | NR | 19.9 ± 12.6 | 49.4 ± 23.1 | NR | HC (30) RA (32) | HC 16/14 RA 14/18 | HC 47.0 (21.0, 52.0) RA 44.0 (32.0, 60.0) |
|
| Poland | Serum | 1H NMR | AS (29) PsA (23) | AS 22/7 PsA 14/9 | AS 45.0 (26.0, 75.0) PsA 43.0 (29.0, 71.0) | AS 11.0 (1.0, 40.0) PsA 8.0 (2.0, 41.0) | AS 8.2 (5.7, 10.0) PsA 8.0 (6.0, 9.0) | RA (26) | 5/21 | 55.0 (23.0, 74.0) | ||
|
| Turkey | Serum | LC-MS | AS (85) | 55/30 | 40.1 ± 9.4; | NR; | 12.7 (3.0, 89.1); | 20.7 (4.6, 103.5); | 5.1 ± 1.1; | HC (50) | 27/23 | 41.6 ± 6.8 |
|
| China | Saliva | GC-MS | AS 37 | 24/13 | 33.9 ± 1.9 | 14.5 (3.0, 59.8) months | 7.1 (1.8, 15.8) | 16.4 ± 2.7 | 3.1 (2.1, 3.9) | HC (41) | 27/14 | 33.3 ± 1.7 |
|
| Turkey | Serum | LC-MS | AS 60 | 38/22 | 42.1 ± 8.1 | 9.7 ± 7.8 | 5.7 (1.4, 50.7) | 14.5 (2.0, 60.0) | 4.9 ± 1.7 | HC (60) | 35/25 | 42.9 ± 8.5 |
|
| China | Serum | LC-MS | AS 32 | 29/3 | 28.6 ± 7.5 | 94.3 ± 48.8 months | 21.1 (12.4, 44.0) | 29.5 (12.5, 46.5) | 6.9 ± 2.0 | HC (40) | 37/3 | 27.1 ± 5.6 |
|
| |||||||||||||
|
| Sweden | Plasma | LC-MS and GC-MS | PsA (20) | 10/10 | 48.0 ± 12.0 | 15.0 ± 12.0 | NR | NR | NR | RA (25) | 9/16 | 51.1 ± 17.8 |
|
| United | Urine | 1H NMR | PsA (20) | 10/10 | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | Baseline vs. 12 weeks after TNFi therapy | ||
|
| United | Serum | GC-TOF MS | PsA (10) | 5/5 | 15.0 ± 13.6 | 7.9 ± 6.8 | NR | NR | NR | HC (10) | 5/5 | 46.0 ± 15.0 |
|
| United | Urine | GC-MS | PsA (20) | 10/10 | 48.0 ± 12.0 | At least 6 months | 14.2 ± 17.2 | NR | NR | Baseline vs. 12 weeks after TNFi therapy | ||
|
| Germany | Serum | 1H NMR | PsA (73) | 44/29 | 56.2 (30.0, 78.0) | 9.0 (0, 24) | 6.7 ± 13.8 | NR | NR | negRA (49) | 10/39 | 64.2 (32.0, 83.0) |
|
| Spain | Synovium | MALDI-MSI | PsA 12 | 6/6 | 52.0 ± 13.0 | NR | 1.2 ± 1.8 | NR | NR | OA (13) | 2/11 | 73.0 ± 11.0 |
|
| |||||||||||||
|
| United | Exhaled breath | SIFT-MS | JIA (21) | NR | (5.0, 21.0) | NR | NR | NR | NR | HC (55) | NR | (5.0, 21.0) |
|
| United | Feces | LC-MS | JIA/ERA (24) | 12/12 | 14.0 (7.0, 17.0) | NR | NR | NR | NR | HC (19) | 7/12 | 11.0 (7.0, 18.0) |
|
| Israel | Urine | GC-MS | JIA (11) | 3/8 | 12.0 ± 6.2 | 6.3 ± 5.2 | NR | NR | NR | HC (11) | Match with SpA groups | Match with SpA groups |
|
| Italy | Feces | GC-MS and 1H NMR | JIA (60) | 16/44 | 7.0 ± 4.1 | <6 months | 1.4 ± 1.6 | 24.6 ± 20.4 | NR | HC (25) | 11/14 | 9.8 ± 2.9 |
|
| United | Plasma | GC-TOF-MS; Q-TOF-MS | JIA (30) | 9/21 | 9.5 (5.0, 15.0) | NR | 1.5 (0.5, 3.2) | 16.0 | NR | Baseline vs. 3 months after MTX therapy | ||
|
| India | Serum, synovial fluid | 1H NMR | ReA (19) uSpA (13) | ReA 12/7 | 26.0 | NR | NR | NR | NR | HC (18) | 17/1 | 29.0 |
|
| India | Serum | 1H NMR | ReA (52) | 44/8 | 29.0 ± 10.9 | NR | 7.4 ± 7.8 | 77.8 ± 37.6 | NR | HC (82) RA (29) | HC 57/25 RA 2/27 | HC 36.4 ± 9.3 RA 40.1 ± 11.8 |
|
| United | Serum, synovial fluid | LC-MS | ReA (7) | 7/0 | 25.0 ± 4.3 | 9.0 ± 4.4 weeks | 12.1 ± 15.9 | 9.8 ± 11.7 | NR | HC (23) RA (20) | HC 9/14 RA 6/14 | HC 48.0 ± 15.1 RA 54.1 ± 17.1 |
|
| |||||||||||||
|
| India | Serum, synovial fluid | 1H NMR | ReA/uSpA (30) ReA (19) uSpA (11) | 24/6 | 27.9 ± 9.1 | NR | NR | NR | NR | RA (25) OA (21) | RA 5/20 OA 5/16 | RA 41.5 ± 12.6 OA 59.8 ± 8.2 |
|
| India | Synovial fluid | 1H NMR | ReA (58) | 49/9 | 29.1 ± 10.9 | NR | NR | NR | NR | RA (21) OA (20) | RA 4/27 OA 4/16 | RA 45.8 ± 12.6 OA 59.5 ± 8.3 |
This systematic review included 31 studies, in which a total of 1,176 SpA patients and 1,357 control participants were included. Among these studies, 13 studies included AS patients, 7 studies included PsA patients, 5 studies included JIA patients, 5 studies included ReA patients, 2 studies included uSpA patients, 1 study included ERA patients, 1 study included IBD-SpA and 1 study enrolled cases with mixed subtypes of SpA without describing a specific subtype. Descriptive statistics are presented as [mean ± SD or median (range)].
LC-MS, liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry; 1H NMR, proton nuclear magnetic resonance; GC-MS, gas chromatography–mass spectrometry; GC-TOF MS, gas chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry; UPLC-QTOF MS, ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry; UPLC-TQ-MS, ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with triple-quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry; MALDI-MSI, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry imaging; SIFT-MS, selected ion flow tube mass spectrometry; Q-TOF-MS, quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry; SpA, spondyloarthritis; axSpA, axial SpA; CD-axSpA, Crohn’s-axSpA; AS, ankylosing spondylitis; PsA, psoriatic arthritis; JIA, juvenile idiopathic arthritis; ReA, reactive arthritis; uSpA, undifferentiated SpA; HC, healthy control; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; negRA, seronegative RA; OA, osteoarthritis; CD, Crohn’s disease; yr, year; BASDAI, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index; TNFi, TNF-alpha inhibitors; NR, not reported.
FIGURE 2Altered metabolic profile consistently found in patients with SpA, compared with healthy participants. Dysregulation levels of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, creatine and carnitine suggest aberrant energy metabolism in SpA patients. Altered levels of phosphate and VitD3 suggest aberrant bone metabolism in SpA patients, while the role of disturbed amino acid levels in the pathogenesis of aberrant bone metabolism requires further investigation. Moreover, gut dysbiosis of SpA contribute to altered levels of SCFAs, Trp and its derivatives. SpA, Spondyloarthritis; HC, healthy control; PUFAs, polyunsaturated fatty acids; SCFAs, short-chain fatty acids; VitD3, vitamin D3; Trp, tryptophan; Kyn, kynurenine; 5-HT, serotonin; Arg, arginine; Asn, asparagine; Gln, glutamine; Glu, glutamic acid; His, histidine; Ile, isoleucine; Lys, lysine; Thr, Threonine; Asp, aspartic acid; Cys, cysteine; Gly, glycine; Pro, proline; Ser, serine; Tyr, tyrosine.