| Literature DB >> 36118189 |
Juan Chen1, Ying Niu1, Jie Wang1, Ziyao Yang1, Zijian Cai1, Xiaofang Dao1, Chengen Wang2, Yong Wang3, Yaqiu Lin3.
Abstract
Physicochemical properties, bacterial communities, and volatile compounds of mutton sausage produced from Jianzhou Big-Eared goat meat during natural ripening were investigated. Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes accounted for over 66% of all operational taxonomic units (OTUs) throughout the whole process, with Lachnospiraceae_NK4A136_group and Staphylococcus as the predominant genus during the early and later ripening periods, respectively. The evolution of microbial composition became less rich and diverse. The uncultured bacterium, the Lachnospiraceae_NK4A136_group, and Staphylococcus were marker bacteria on days 0, 7, and 26, respectively, with none on day 16. The bacteria distribution seemed to influence the volatile profile of mutton sausage throughout processing, with the bacterial composition on day 0 and day 7 clustered separately from day 16 and day 26, and the same pattern for the volatile profile. Meanwhile, the concentration of total volatile fraction significantly increased, and the majority of the volatile compounds were generated during late ripening. Non-anal, hexanal, decanal, heptanal, dodecyl aldehyde, benzaldehyde, 3-methylbutanal, γ-dodecalactone, 2-pentylfuran, and 1-octen-3-ol were key volatile compounds, contributing to the overall mutton sausage flavors. Based on Spearman's correlation analysis, Staphylococcus as well as Psychrobacter were positively correlated with the production of the key volatile compounds, and other bacteria such as Lachnospiraceae_NK4A136_group, Bacteroides, Lactobacillus, Prevotella_1, Odoribacter, and so on were associated with the production of most alcohols and esters.Entities:
Keywords: bacterial community; correlation between bacteria and volatiles; naturally fermented mutton sausage; physicochemical properties; volatile flavors
Year: 2022 PMID: 36118189 PMCID: PMC9478030 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.961117
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 6.064
Physicochemical properties of fermented mutton sausage during natural ripening (means ± standard errors).
| Day | 0 | 7 | 16 | 26 |
| pH value | 5.55 ± 0.02d | 5.76 ± 0.02c | 5.87 ± 0.03b | 5.99 ± 0.02a |
| Moisture content (%) | 43.62 ± 2.89a | 15.95 ± 1.49b | 6.96 ± 0.49c | 3.48 ± 1.42c |
| Nitrite ion concentration (mg/kg) | 29.95 ± 4.47a | 3.12 ± 0.73b | 1.94 ± 0.22b | 4.22 ± 0.36b |
| TBARS (mg MDA/kg) | 0.17 ± 0.03b | 0.32 ± 0.02b | 1.73 ± 0.30a | 1.63 ± 0.42a |
| L* | 47.40 ± 4.88a | 37.13 ± 2.58b | 39.44 ± 2.85 | 37.27 ± 0.94b |
| a* | 12.38 ± 2.67a | 18.71 ± 1.21a | 13.63 ± 1.23a | 11.15 ± 1.57a |
| b* | 13.30 ± 0.98 | 11.06 ± 1.03b | 13.70 ± 0.70 | 14.88 ± 1.18a |
| TSA (log CFU/g) | 5.16 ± 0.61c | 6.76 ± 0.13b | 7.83 ± 0.52a | 8.15 ± 0.44a |
| MSA (log CFU/g) | 5.17 ± 0.19c | 6.40 ± 0.40b | 7.26 ± 0.72 | 7.83 ± 0.60a |
| MRSA (log CFU/g) | 4.97 ± 0.49c | 6.00 ± 0.59b | 6.96 ± 0.79a | 7.18 ± 0.34a |
Within each row, means with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05).
FIGURE 1Relative abundance of bacteria at the phylum level of fermented mutton sausage during natural ripening (the 15 most abundant phyla).
FIGURE 2Relative abundance of bacteria at the genus level of fermented mutton sausage during natural ripening (the 15 most abundant genera).
Alpha diversity indices of fermented mutton sausage during natural ripening.
| Samples | Observed OTUs | Goods_ | Chao1 | Shannon | Simpson |
| Day 0 | 7189 | 0.99 | 4164.9 | 9.95 | 1 |
| Day 7 | 6674 | 0.99 | 4026.4 | 9.77 | 1 |
| Day 16 | 6602 | 0.99 | 3542.3 | 7.03 | 0.9 |
| Day 26 | 6093 | 0.99 | 3290.7 | 5.52 | 0.76 |
FIGURE 3A Venn diagram of fermented mutton sausage during natural ripening based on the OTUs of bacteria.
FIGURE 4Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) results of bacterial communities of fermented mutton sausage during natural ripening based on Bray–Curtis distance with 95% confidence level.
FIGURE 5LEfSe highlights consistently differentia bacteria taxa of fermented mutton sausage during natural ripening within four stages. (A) Cladogram representation; (B) the predominant bacteria of the microbiota, LDA score is over 4. Labels beginning with o_indicate order; f_family; g_genus; s_species.
Contents (μg/kg) of volatile compounds of fermented mutton sausage during natural ripening (means ± standard errors).
| Compounds | RI[ | Threshold[ | Day 0 | Day 7 | Day 16 | Day 26 | Aroma descriptor | ||||
|
| Content | ROAV | Content | ROAV | Content | ROAV | Content | ROAV | |||
| Hexanal | 1126 | 4.5 | 28.09 ± 0.09c | 5.94 | 13.52 ± 0.28c | 0.92 | 234.40 ± 4.49b | 12.35 | 498.76 ± 7.07a | 11.23 | Grass, tallow, and fat |
| 1450 | 3 | 17.68 ± 0.39b | 5.61 | n.d. | — | 47.79 ± 1.62b | 3.78 | 121.15 ± 2.97a | 4.09 | Nut and fat | |
| Decanal | 1503 | 3 | 53.32 ± 1.15b | 16.93 | 58.26 ± 0.66b | 5.93 | 151.01 ± 2.62a | 11.94 | 150.18 ± 1.38a | 5.07 | Tallow |
| Benzaldehyde | 1547 | 41.7 | 326.45 ± 3.44b | 7.45 | 129.23 ± 1.76c | 0.95 | 315.55 ± 3.76b | 1.80 | 639.27 ± 1.83a | 1.55 | Almond and burnt sugar |
| Dodecyl aldehyde | 1715 | 0.13 | 13.65 ± 0.99b | 100.00 | 18.74 ± 0.58a | 44.01 | 27.55 ± 0.28a | 50.27 | n.d. | – | Citrus, tallow, and fat |
| 1676 | 0.3 | 17.60 ± 0.25a | 55.86 | n.d. | – | n.d. | – | 64.64 ± 0.52a | 21.84 | Cilantro | |
| Non-anal | 1571 | 1.1 | n.d. | – | 360.35 ± 3.98b | 100.00 | 463.76 ± 2.3b | 100.00 | 1085.29 ± 9.35a | 100.00 | Fat, citrus, and green |
| 3-methyl-butanal | 930 | 5.8 | n.d. | – | n.d. | – | 29.56 ± 0.50a | 1.21 | 53.54 ± 0.92a | 0.94 | Buttery and nut |
| Heptanal | 1296 | 2.8 | n.d. | – | n.d. | – | 67.06 ± 4.23b | 5.68 | 203.90 ± 6.00a | 7.38 | Tallow and fat |
| 2-undecenal | 1670 | 5 | n.d. | – | n.d. | – | 97.75 ± 3.62 | 4.64 | n.d. | – | Tallow and fat |
| Pentanal | 1010 | 12 | n.d. | – | n.d. | – | n.d. | – | 50.73 ± 0.87 | 0.43 | Cheesy |
| Octanal | 1222 | 0.587 | n.d. | – | n.d. | – | n.d. | – | 339.30 ± 5.04 | 58.59 | Fruity |
| 1339 | 0.75 | n.d. | – | n.d. | – | n.d. | – | 105.25 ± 3.28 | 14.22 | Grass | |
| 4-ethylbenzaldehyde | 1717 | 123.23 | n.d. | – | n.d. | – | n.d. | – | 63.33 ± 1.04 | 0.05 | Fruity and nut |
| Subtotal | 456.79 | 580.11 | 1434.77 | 3375.33 | |||||||
|
| |||||||||||
| 1422 | 231.9 | 19.60 ± 0.03 | 0.08 | n.d. | – | n.d. | – | n.d. | – | Fruity | |
| 1-octen-3-ol | 1579 | 1.5 | 36.21 ± 0.70b | 22.99 | 30.38 ± 2.22b | 6.18 | 155.86 ± 1.09a | 24.64 | 243.28 ± 2.68a | 16.44 | Mushroom-like |
| Heptanol | 1646 | 5.4 | 11.92 ± 1.46 | 2.10 | n.d. | – | n.d. | – | n.d. | – | Green |
| 1,6-octadien-3-ol, 3,7- dimethyl-, | 1553 | 0.22 | 9.15 ± 0.39 | 39.61 | n.d. | – | n.d. | – | n.d. | – | Flower, citrus, orange, terpene, waxy, and rose |
| Undecanol | 1830 | 700 | 29.13 ± 1.16a | 0.04 | 21.52 ± 3.14a | 0.01 | n.d. | – | n.d. | – | Rose |
| 1616 | 209 | 336.68 ± 3.15 | 1.53 | n.d. | – | n.d. | – | n.d. | – | Violet like | |
| Non-anol | 1638 | 45.5 | 15.94 ± 0.27a | 0.33 | 10.85 ± 0.46a | 0.07 | n.d. | – | n.d. | – | Rose |
| 3-methylbutanol | 1217 | 4 | 28.37 ± 1.21 | 6.75 | n.d. | – | n.d. | – | n.d. | – | Brandy like, apple |
| Pentanol | 1241 | 150.2 | n.d. | – | n.d. | – | n.d. | – | 34.04 ± 1.67 | 0.02 | Fruity, alcoholic, green, balsamic, and woody |
| Octanol | 1520 | 125.8 | n.d. | – | n.d. | – | 116.08 ± 3.49 | 0.22 | n.d. | – | Chemical, metal, and burnt |
| Benzyl alcohol | 1900 | 2546.21 | n.d. | – | n.d. | – | n.d. | – | 74.36 ± 2.12 | 0.003 | Flower |
| Subtotal | 487.00 | 57.33 | 271.93 | 351.68 | |||||||
|
| |||||||||||
| 6,10-dimethyl-5,9-undecadien-2-one | 1935 | 60 | 29.71 ± 0.93c | 0.47 | 36.57 ± 0.39c | 0.19 | 76.46 ± 0.90b | 0.30 | 110.94 ± 4.3a | 0.19 | Spice |
| 4-hydroxy-4-methyl-2-pentanone | 1804 | – | 23.42 ± 2.19b | – | 25.69 ± 3.50b | – | 190.61 ± 4.16a | – | 44.01 ± 1.25b | – | – |
| 2-Non-anone | 1419 | 41 | 18.37 ± 0.27 | 0.43 | n.d. | – | n.d. | – | n.d. | – | Rose and tea |
| Acetoin | 1340 | 14 | n.d. | – | 10.02 ± 0.04 | 0.22 | n.d. | – | n.d. | – | Cream |
| Benzophenone | 2975 | – | n.d. | – | n.d. | – | 21.55 ± 0.43b | – | 104.64 ± 0.23a | – | Rose |
| Subtotal | 71.51 | 72.29 | 288.62 | 259.59 | |||||||
|
| |||||||||||
| Methyl myristate | 2219 | – | n.d. | – | 10.07 ± 0.45 | – | n.d. | – | n.d. | – | Honey |
| Tributyrin | 2457 | – | n.d. | – | 37.39 ± 0.59a | – | 45.78 ± 0.62a | – | n.d. | – | Oil, fat, and tallow |
| Amyl butyrate | 1478 | 210 | n.d. | – | n.d. | – | 35.03 ± 2.03 | 0.04 | n.d. | – | Sweety |
| Butyl butyrate | 1492 | 400 | n.d. | – | n.d. | – | n.d. | – | 53.50 ± 2.39 | 0.01 | Fruity |
| Hexyl formate | 1642 | – | 18.06 ± 0.02a | – | n.d. | – | 26.19 ± 2.02a | – | n.d. | – | Fruity |
| Subtotal | 18.06 | 47.47 | 107.00 | 53.50 | |||||||
|
| |||||||||||
| γ-dodecalactone | 2332 | 0.43 | 36.52 ± 1.86b | 80.88 | 23.22 ± 2.06b | 16.48 | 55.57 ± 4.12b | 30.66 | 121.12 ± 4.05a | 28.55 | Fruity |
| δ-tetradecalactone | 2150 | 29000 | n.d. | – | n.d. | – | 19.07 ± 1.12 | 0.00002 | n.d. | – | – |
| 2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-(2Z)-2-octen-1-yl- | 2401 | – | n.d. | – | n.d. | – | 17.37 ± 0.66 | – | n.d. | – | – |
| Subtotal | 36.52 | 23.22 | 92.02 | 121.12 | |||||||
|
| |||||||||||
| 4-methylvaleric acid | 2471 | 810 | n.d. | – | 14.30 ± 0.17 | 0.01 | n.d. | – | n.d. | – | Acid |
| 2-methylbutyric acid | 1704 | 5800 | n.d. | – | n.d. | – | 34.27 ± 2.23 | 0.0014 | n.d. | – | Roquefort |
| Subtotal | 0.00 | 14.30 | 34.27 | 0.00 | |||||||
|
| |||||||||||
| Tetramethylpyrazine | 1439 | 2525.02 | n.d. | – | n.d. | – | 144.98 ± 6.12b | 0.01 | 1006.46 ± 36.47a | 0.04 | Tallow and fat |
| 2,3-dimethylpyrazine | 1385 | 800 | n.d. | – | n.d. | – | n.d. | – | 172.80 ± 4.80 | 0.02 | Meaty and cream |
| Subtotal | 0.00 | 0.00 | 144.98 | 1179.26 | |||||||
|
| |||||||||||
| 2-pentylfuran | 1252 | 5.8 | 11.17 ± 0.38c | 1.83 | 12.30 ± 0.20c | 0.65 | 45.70 ± 4.67b | 1.87 | 108.31 ± 4.89a | 1.89 | Grass and fruity |
| Subtotal | 11.17 | 12.30 | 45.70 | 108.31 | |||||||
|
| |||||||||||
| 2-methoxyphenol | 1902 | 1.6 | 8.70 ± 0.51 | 5.18 | n.d. | – | n.d. | – | n.d. | – | Meaty |
| Subtotal | 8.70 | 9.23 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
Within each row, means with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05). n.d. not detected.
1Retention index calculated for TG-WAXMS B capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm).
2Odor threshold value referred to Compilations of odor threshold values in air, water, and other media (second enlarged and revised edition). van Gemert (2011): Science Press.
FIGURE 6Total ion current chromatogram of fermented mutton sausage on day 26.
FIGURE 7The PCA score plot of total volatile compounds of fermented mutton sausage on days 0, 7, 16, and 26.
FIGURE 8A heatmap of the Spearman rank correlation between genera with relative abundance in the top 15 and the volatile properties in fermented mutton sausage during natural ripening. The intensity of the colors represents the degree of correlation between the genera and volatile compounds, where the blue color represents a negative degree of correlation and red a positive correlation.
Sensory quality (means ± standard error) of fermented mutton sausage during natural ripening.
| Parameters | Day 0 | Day 7 | Day 16 | Day 26 |
| Appearance | 1.75 ± 0.25c | 5.00 ± 0.82b | 7.00 ± 0.41a | 5.25 ± 0.63 |
| Color | 2.00 ± 0.41b | 6.50 ± 0.64a | 6.75 ± 0.48a | 5.75 ± 0.48a |
| Flavor | 1.75 ± 0.25b | 5.25 ± 0.75a | 6.50 + 0.29a | 6.25 ± 1.18a |
| Overall acceptability | 1.75 ± 0.48c | 5.00 ± 0.82b | 7.25 ± 0.48a | 5.50 ± 0.50 |
Means within each row with different superscript letters are significantly different (P < 0.05).