Yi Sun1, Xingzhi Wang2, Jiayin Zhu3, Liangjian Chen4, Yuhang Jia5, Jean M Lawrence6, Luo-Hua Jiang7, Xiaohui Xie4, Jun Wu1. 1. Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Program in Public Health, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA. 2. School of Computer Science, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China. 3. School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China. 4. Department of Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA. 5. Testin AI Data, Beijing Yunce Information Technology Co., Ltd, China. 6. Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA. 7. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
Abstract
Background: Compared to commonly-used green space indicators from downward-facing satellite imagery, street view-based green space may capture different types of green space and represent how environments are perceived and experienced by people on the ground, which is important to elucidate the underlying mechanisms linking green space and health. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate machine learning models that can classify the type of vegetation (i.e., tree, low-lying vegetation, grass) from street view images; and to investigate the associations between street green space and socioeconomic (SES) factors, in Los Angeles County, California. Methods: SES variables were obtained from the CalEnviroScreen3.0 dataset. Microsoft Bing Maps images in conjunction with deep learning were used to measure total and types of street view green space, which were compared to normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) as commonly-used satellite-based green space measure. Generalized linear mixed model was used to examine associations between green space and census tract SES, adjusting for population density and rural/urban status. Results: The accuracy of the deep learning model was high with 92.5% mean intersection over union. NDVI were moderately correlated with total street view-based green space and tree, and weakly correlated with low-lying vegetation and grass. Total and three types of green space showed significant negative associations with neighborhood SES. The percentage of total green space decreased by 2.62 [95% confidence interval (CI): -3.02, -2.21, p < 0.001] with each interquartile range increase in CalEnviroScreen3.0 score. Disadvantaged communities contained approximately 5% less average street green space than other communities. Conclusion: Street view imagery coupled with deep learning approach can accurately and efficiently measure eye-level street green space and distinguish vegetation types. In Los Angeles County, disadvantaged communities had substantively less street green space. Governments and urban planners need to consider the type and visibility of street green space from pedestrian's perspective.
Background: Compared to commonly-used green space indicators from downward-facing satellite imagery, street view-based green space may capture different types of green space and represent how environments are perceived and experienced by people on the ground, which is important to elucidate the underlying mechanisms linking green space and health. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate machine learning models that can classify the type of vegetation (i.e., tree, low-lying vegetation, grass) from street view images; and to investigate the associations between street green space and socioeconomic (SES) factors, in Los Angeles County, California. Methods: SES variables were obtained from the CalEnviroScreen3.0 dataset. Microsoft Bing Maps images in conjunction with deep learning were used to measure total and types of street view green space, which were compared to normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) as commonly-used satellite-based green space measure. Generalized linear mixed model was used to examine associations between green space and census tract SES, adjusting for population density and rural/urban status. Results: The accuracy of the deep learning model was high with 92.5% mean intersection over union. NDVI were moderately correlated with total street view-based green space and tree, and weakly correlated with low-lying vegetation and grass. Total and three types of green space showed significant negative associations with neighborhood SES. The percentage of total green space decreased by 2.62 [95% confidence interval (CI): -3.02, -2.21, p < 0.001] with each interquartile range increase in CalEnviroScreen3.0 score. Disadvantaged communities contained approximately 5% less average street green space than other communities. Conclusion: Street view imagery coupled with deep learning approach can accurately and efficiently measure eye-level street green space and distinguish vegetation types. In Los Angeles County, disadvantaged communities had substantively less street green space. Governments and urban planners need to consider the type and visibility of street green space from pedestrian's perspective.
Entities:
Keywords:
Environmental health disparity; Green space; Machine learning; Socioeconomic status; Street view image
Authors: Iana Markevych; Julia Schoierer; Terry Hartig; Alexandra Chudnovsky; Perry Hystad; Angel M Dzhambov; Sjerp de Vries; Margarita Triguero-Mas; Michael Brauer; Mark J Nieuwenhuijsen; Gerd Lupp; Elizabeth A Richardson; Thomas Astell-Burt; Donka Dimitrova; Xiaoqi Feng; Maya Sadeh; Marie Standl; Joachim Heinrich; Elaine Fuertes Journal: Environ Res Date: 2017-06-30 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Yi Sun; Paige Sheridan; Olivier Laurent; Jia Li; David A Sacks; Heidi Fischer; Yang Qiu; Yu Jiang; Ilona S Yim; Luo-Hua Jiang; John Molitor; Jiu-Chiuan Chen; Tarik Benmarhnia; Jean M Lawrence; Jun Wu Journal: Environ Int Date: 2020-06-05 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Kate M Shaw; Kristina A Theis; Shannon Self-Brown; Douglas W Roblin; Lawrence Barker Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2016-09-01 Impact factor: 2.830