| Literature DB >> 36118093 |
Rui Zhang1, Jinlian Liu1, Songrui Di1, Shuhui Yu1, Xinjuan Hou1, Fan Zhao1, Chandi Wang1, Yingli Zhu2, Ruying Tang2, Shixin Deng3, Chun Wang1, Jianjun Zhang1.
Abstract
Background: Oxidative stress and memory impairment have been implicated as common functional brain diseases. Nuclear factor E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) is highly induced in oxidative stress, indicating that Nrf2 is an emerging target of memory therapy. This study aimed to investigate the effect of noni on brain memory impairment induced by hydrocortisone and its protective mechanism in mice.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36118093 PMCID: PMC9477619 DOI: 10.1155/2022/2781906
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.650
Weight of mice and BI ( ± s, n = 8).
| Group | 7d weight (g) | 14d weight (g) | BI (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 25.6 ± 0.9 | 42.4 ± 2.1 | 0.7 ± 0.1 |
| Model | 25.6 ± 0.6 | 39.5 ± 2.2 | 0.8 ± 0.1 |
| Ginseng | 25.3 ± 0.9 | 39.0 ± 4.2 | 0.8 ± 0.1 |
| H-Noni | 25.3 ± 0.6 | 38.5 ± 3.5 | 0.8 ± 0.0 |
| M-Noni | 25.6 ± 1.1 | 39.0 ± 2.7 | 0.8 ± 0.1 |
| L-Noni | 25.1 ± 0.9 | 38.1 ± 3.1 | 0.8 ± 0.0 |
Effects of noni on the step-down avoidance test in mice ( ± s, n = 8).
| Group | Incubation period (s) | Error time | Vanish period (s) | Vanish error time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 145.9 ± 2.9 | 3.0 ± 2.1 | 181.8 ± 4.7 | 1.5 ± 0.9 |
| Model | 72.1 ± 8.2 | 5.9 ± 1.4 | 97.6 ± 6.0 | 4.1 ± 1.1 |
| Ginseng | 99.3 ± 12.9## | 2.5 ± 1.3## | 155.6 ± 8.4## | 1.6 ± 0.7## |
| H-Noni | 120.4 ± 11.0##△△ | 3.0 ± 0.9##△△ | 163.4 ± 9.2##△△ | 1.5 ± 0.9##△△ |
| M-Noni | 90.1 ± 11.3##△△ | 3.1 ± 1.7##△△ | 135.3 ± 7.4##△△ | 3.0 ± 0.8# |
| L-Noni | 79.3 ± 6.2 | 4.6 ± 1.5 | 104.1 ± 10.6 | 4.0 ± 0.8 |
Notes: vs. control group p < 0.01; vs. model group p # < 0.05, p ## < 0.01; vs. L-noni group p ΔΔ < 0.01.
Effects of noni on the passive avoidance test in mice ( ± s, n = 8).
| Group | Incubation period (s) | Error time | Vanish period (s) | Vanish error time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 49.5 ± 6.5 | 2.0 ± 1.7 | 132.3 ± 8.3 | 2.0 ± 1.7 |
| Model | 31.5 ± 6.1 | 4.1 ± 1.1 | 80.3 ± 6.2 | 4.0 ± 1.2 |
| Ginseng | 58.1 ± 6.4## | 1.9 ± 0.8## | 115.8 ± 10.4## | 2.1 ± 1.0## |
| H-noni | 46.4 ± 6.7##△△ | 2.0 ± 1.1##△△ | 124.9 ± 14.2##△△ | 2.4 ± 1.2##△△ |
| M-noni | 38.5 ± 5.0#△△ | 3.9 ± 0.8 | 123.0 ± 5.1##△△ | 3.6 ± 0.7 |
| L-noni | 29.0 ± 4.4 | 4.4 ± 0.7 | 108.0 ± 9.0## | 4.1 ± 1.0 |
Notes: vs. control group p < 0.01; vs. model group p ## < 0.01; vs. L-noni group p ΔΔ < 0.01.
Figure 1Mice brain tissue of HE staining (×10, ×100).
Expression of neurotransmitters in brain ( ± s, n = 8).
| Group | ACh (pmol/g) | 5-HT (ng/g) | DA (ng/g) | NA (ng/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 11.34 ± 0.86 | 7.04 ± 0.45 | 25.85 ± 2.96 | 37.68 ± 8.11 |
| Model | 7.65 ± 0.93 | 4.97 ± 0.24 | 16.10 ± 1.18 | 27.39 ± 1.84 |
| Ginseng | 13.86 ± 2.23## | 6.61 ± 0.55## | 26.72 ± 5.28## | 36.40 ± 5.50## |
| H-noni | 13.79 ± 2.87##△△ | 6.66 ± 0.71##△△ | 26.40 ± 2.59##△△ | 41.00 ± 6.91##△△ |
| M-noni | 10.57 ± 1.68## | 5.74 ± 0.43 | 21.06 ± 4.69# | 35.46 ± 3.90# |
| L-noni | 9.39 ± 1.31 | 5.52 ± 0.32 | 19.18 ± 3.51 | 30.26 ± 1.38 |
Notes: vs. control group p < 0.01; vs. model group p # < 0.05, p ## < 0.01; vs. L-noni group p ΔΔ < 0.01.
Expression of T-SOD, CAT, LPO, and MDA in the brain ( ± s, n = 8).
| Group | T-SOD (U/mgprot) | CAT (U/mgprot) | LPO (U/mgprot) | MDA (mgprot/ml) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 141.37 ± 13.07 | 3.94 ± 0.25 | 0.57 ± 0.13 | 2.08 ± 0.40 |
| Model | 104.96 ± 10.01 | 3.29 ± 0.23 | 0.27 ± 0.06 | 2.58 ± 0.20 |
| Ginseng | 139.41 ± 20.76## | 3.70 ± 0.42 | 0.54 ± 0.09## | 2.21 ± 0.42# |
| H-noni | 141.69 ± 18.19##△△ | 4.99 ± 0.66##△△ | 0.56 ± 0.11##△△ | 1.81 ± 0.38## |
| M-noni | 111.23 ± 11.71 | 3.71 ± 0.55 | 0.35 ± 0.12 | 1.89 ± 0.23## |
| L-noni | 110.35 ± 14.14 | 3.58 ± 0.34 | 0.32 ± 0.06 | 2.07 ± 0.23## |
Notes: vs. control group p < 0.01; vs. model group p # < 0.05, p ## < 0.01; vs. L-noni group p ΔΔ < 0.01.
Figure 2Nrf2, KEAP1, and HO-1 protein expression in brain tissue of mice in each group ( ± s, n = 3). Notes: vs. control group p < 0.05; vs. model group p # < 0.05.