| Literature DB >> 36117854 |
V N Kiroy1, P O Kosenko1, A B Smolikov1, A I Saevskiy1, E V Aslanyan1, P D Shaposhnikov1, Yu A Rebrov1, F V Arsenyev2.
Abstract
The nature and severity of mitral/tufted (M/T) cells reactions to odorants presented in anesthesia depend on various factors, and, above all, the nature and concentration of the odor, anesthesia, and the functional state of the olfactory bulb (OB). Compared to wakefulness, under anesthesia, the intensity of OB M/T cells responses to the odorants presented increases. However, the influence of anesthesia dynamics on the intensity of such responses has not been studied. To address this problem in rats, the activity of M/T cells and the local field potentials (LFP) in OB were recorded in the course of xylazine-tiletamine-zolazepam (XTZ) anesthesia. It has been shown that in the course of the anesthesia, the average frequency of background and odorant-induced single-unit activity of M/T cells increases, while the dominant frequency value of LFP in the gamma frequency range (90-170 Hz), on the contrary, decreases. The observed effects are assumed to be associated with changes in the functional state of the OB and systems for processing olfactory information in anesthesia.Entities:
Keywords: Gamma activity; LFP, local field potential; Mitral/tufted cells; OB, olfactory bulb; Rat olfactory bulb; XTZ, xylazine-tiletamine-zolazepam; Xylazine-tiletamine-zolazepam anesthesia; М/Т, mitral/tufted cells
Year: 2022 PMID: 36117854 PMCID: PMC9474852 DOI: 10.1016/j.ibneur.2022.09.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: IBRO Neurosci Rep ISSN: 2667-2421
Fig. 1Schematic of the experimental system for the registration of LFP and single-unit activity of rat OB neurons during presentation of either clean air or the gas-air mixture containing the tobacco odorant, Designations: 1 - an anesthetized rat with an implanted microelectrode array that ensures the recording of LFP and single-unit activity from the OB dorsal surface; 2 - experimental chamber (box); 3 - system for automatically maintaining the temperature of the animal's body; 4 - breathing control system; 5 – odorant presentation system; 5.1 - valves; 5.2–15-liter cylinders containing gas-air mixtures; 5.3 - air injected by the compressor; 5.4 - mask for supplying the gas-air mixture; 5.5 - valve control board; 6–32-channel system Plexon Multichannel Acquisition Processor (Plexon Corp., Dallas, Texas, USA); 7 - PC; 8 - Plexon software.
Fig. 2Odorant-induced M/T neuronal activity. Peristimulus raster plots (top, black serifs are spikes) and histograms (bottom) of the spiking activity of neurons that react with excitation (A) and inhibition (B) to the presentation of the tobacco odorant (bin=1 s). 0 – onset of the tobacco odorant sample presentation. The period of odorant presentation is marked with a gray rectangle. (C) - statistical characteristics of the responses of excitatory (Exc.) and inhibitory (Inh.) M/T neurons to the presentation of tobacco odorant. (D) - the number of registered neurons.
Fig. 3Change in the average frequency of OB M/T neurons discharges, reacting with excitation and inhibition to the presentation of air samples containing the tobacco odorant, (A) - mean frequency values of the background (blue line) and odorant-induced (red line) single-unit activity of excitatory M/T neurons vs. time. (B) - difference in the responses of excitatory neurons between the presentation of the tobacco odorant and air vs. time. (C) - an example of a peristimulus histogram of an excitatory M/T neuron. (D) - mean frequency values of the background (blue line) and odorant-induced (red line) single-unit activity of inhibitory M/T neurons vs. time. (E) - difference in the responses of inhibitory neurons between the presentation of the tobacco odorant and air vs. time. (F) - an example of peristimulus histogram of an inhibitory M/T neuron.
Results of MANOVA of the average frequency values of M/T neurons discharges induced by presentation of the odorant, compared to the preceding background (F-V) (only m.e., df eff. are provided; err. = 1; 18).
| 17,47 | 0,0000 | -19,54 | 5,80 | 0,0170 | 13,89 | ||||
| 10,32 | 0,0016 | -16,32 | 3,19 | 0,0759 | 10,41 | ||||
| 20,43 | 0,0000 | -24,00 | 7,70 | 0,0061 | 16,17 | ||||
| 12,14 | 0,0006 | -19,68 | 10,63 | 0,0013 | 18,02 | ||||
| 9,15 | 0,0029 | -18,23 | 21,03 | 0,0000 | 22,34 | ||||
| 13,64 | 0,0003 | -19,62 | 26,24 | 0,0000 | 20,06 | ||||
| 23,03 | 0,0000 | -22,07 | 66,17 | 0,0000 | 27,68 | ||||
| 19,07 | 0,0000 | -20,32 | 153,78 | 0,0000 | 39,00 | ||||
| 7,13 | 0,0083 | -10,22 | 237,54 | 0,0000 | 41,07 | ||||
| 30,90 | 0,0000 | -18,08 | 16,86 | 0,0001 | 26,32 |
Designations: F - Fisher test, p - significance level, % - difference between background and odorant presentation normalized by background, red font - significant, blue font - trend (for all 9 degrees of freedom; 193).
Results of MANOVA of the difference in the average frequency values of M/T neurons discharges during the odorant presentation and in the background during XTZ anesthesia (all designations are inherited from Table 1).
| 0,494623 | 0,483708 | -23,13 | 0,281770 | 0,596896 | -25,88 | ||||
| 0,061466 | 0,804764 | 8,15 | 0,097075 | 0,756114 | 15,19 | ||||
| 0,256003 | 0,614131 | -16,64 | 0,331005 | 0,566553 | 28,05 | ||||
| 0,705442 | 0,403212 | -27,62 | 3,433332 | 0,067283 | 90,35 | ||||
| 0,125441 | 0,724044 | -11,65 | 5,334080 | 0,023281 | 112,62 | ||||
| 0,202780 | 0,653581 | 14,81 | 23,74609 | 0,000005 | 237,62 | ||||
| 0,018663 | 0,891647 | 4,49 | 72,32930 | 0,000000 | 414,71 | ||||
| 1,205492 | 0,275188 | -36,11 | 122,5028 | 0,000000 | 539,71 |
Relationship between the single-unit activity of M/T neurons and the dominant gamma frequency during XTZ anesthesia.
Fig. 4Changes in the OB LFP at the gamma frequencies and the activity of M/T cells during the XTZ anesthesia, (A) - an example of raw OB LFP recordings, pneumogram, and electrocardiogram. (B) – an example of the OB LFP spectrogram in the gamma range. (C) - average values of the dominant gamma frequency (green line) and change in excitatory M/T neurons' firing rates with the presentation of tobacco odorant (difference between odor-induced and baseline firing rates)(red line).