Literature DB >> 3611770

Variation in cuff blood pressure in untreated outpatients with mild hypertension--implications for initiating antihypertensive treatment.

R D Watson, R Lumb, M A Young, T J Stallard, P Davies, W A Littler.   

Abstract

Thirty-two patients with mildly elevated blood pressure (BP), but without target organ damage, attended a BP measuring clinic where duplicate BP measurements were made on 12 visits. During visits 1-3, BP showed a systematic decrease which varied from patient to patient. During visits 4-12, no further systematic changes in BP were observed. During the latter period, between-visit variation in BP was substantial, the standard deviation of the difference in BP from one visit to another being 10.4 mmHg for systolic, 6.8 mmHg for diastolic (phase IV) and 7.0 mmHg for diastolic (phase V). These values were used to determine the chance that the BP estimated after a number of visits differed from the average stable BP. After visit 4, the chance of a difference of 5 mmHg or more was 0.50 systolic blood pressure (SBP) and 0.32 diastolic blood pressure (DBP; phase V). Increasing the number of visits to six or more reduced the chance of error. Before initiating lifelong treatment in mild hypertensives free of target organ damage, BP should be recorded in duplicate on a minimum of six visits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3611770     DOI: 10.1097/00004872-198704000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  15 in total

1.  The diagnosis and treatment of hypertension: does ambulatory pressure monitoring have a role?

Authors:  K R Borkowski
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1989-09-15       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  How many self-measured blood pressure readings are needed to estimate hypertensive patients' "true" blood pressure?

Authors:  M P García-Vera; J Sanz
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1999-02

Review 3.  White coat hypertension: relevance to clinical and emergency medical services personnel.

Authors:  Tipu V Khan; Safa Shakir-Shatnawi Khan; Andre Akhondi; Teepu W Khan
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2007-03-13

Review 4.  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Authors:  T G Pickering
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.369

5.  Variability over time and correlates of cholesterol and blood pressure in systemic lupus erythematosus: a longitudinal cohort study.

Authors:  Mandana Nikpour; Dafna D Gladman; Dominique Ibanez; Paula J Harvey; Murray B Urowitz
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 5.156

6.  Masked hypertension is prevalent in children with sickle cell disease: a Midwest Pediatric Nephrology Consortium study.

Authors:  Ibrahim F Shatat; Sherron M Jakson; Amanda E Blue; Mary A Johnson; John K Orak; Ram Kalpatthi
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 3.714

7.  A series of self-measurements by the patient is a reliable alternative to ambulatory blood pressure measurement.

Authors:  M M Brueren; H J Schouten; P W de Leeuw; G A van Montfrans; J W van Ree
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Decision to treat mild hypertension after assessment by ambulatory monitoring and World Health Organisation recommendations.

Authors:  G Chatellier; C Battaglia; J Y Pagny; P F Plouin; J Ménard
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-10-31

Review 9.  Withdrawal of antihypertensive therapy in the elderly. The issues.

Authors:  M D Fotherby
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.923

10.  How significant is white coat hypertension?

Authors:  Debbie L Cohen; Raymond R Townsend
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.