| Literature DB >> 36117607 |
Shaoqiong Zhang1,2, Ningning He3,4.
Abstract
Advertising and promotions are the most utilized types of augmented reality (AR) activations for marketers across all industries. The same is true for the sports industry. This form of augmented reality is meant to bring attention to the organization through a novel technology such as AR. Recently, a lack of interest among students in extreme sports has been attributed to a lack of professional advertising and marketing innovation. This situation requires the attention of researchers, and this study investigates the impact of augmented reality advertising on college students' interest in extreme sports, specifically in China. The article also investigates the moderating role of innovation resistance and health consciousness in the relationship between augmented reality advertising and college students' interest in extreme sports in China. Students actively participating in sports were selected using the purposive sampling technique, and AMOS was used for data analysis. According to the findings, augmented reality advertising positively correlates with interest in extreme sports. The findings also revealed that innovation resistance and health consciousness significantly moderated college students' interest in extreme sports and augmented reality advertising. This research assists regulators in developing regulations to increase interest in extreme sports through augmented reality advertising and innovation adoption.Entities:
Keywords: augmented reality advertising; college student attitudes; extreme sport; health consciousness; innovation resistance; mental health
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36117607 PMCID: PMC9480498 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.978389
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Figure 1Digital advertisement spending in China.
Variables and measurements.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| ARA1 | “Augmented reality is good for the advertisement purpose” | ( |
| ARA2 | “Augmented reality is favorable for the advertisement purpose” | |
| ARA3 | “Augmented reality is positive for the advertisement purpose” | |
| ARA4 | “Augmented reality is pleasant for the advertisement purpose” | |
|
| ||
| RTI1 | “I will wait to adopt new technology until it proves beneficial” | ( |
| RTI2 | “I need to clarify some queries and justify the reasons for adopting new technology” | |
| RTI3 | “I am waiting for the right time and required capability to adopt new technology” | |
| RTI4 | “I fear wasting my time using new technology” | |
| RTI5 | “I need to get a solution for some of my complaints and objections before I adopt new technology” | |
| RTI6 | “I fear certain changes in the organization may impose on me” | |
| RTI7 | “Innovation is not for me” | |
| RTI8 | “It is unlikely that I will adopt innovation in the future” | |
|
| ||
| HC1 | “For better health, I often have been doing proper exercises at home” | ( |
| HC2 | “For better health, I often do gymnastics at home (such as dance, yoga, aerobics, etc.)” | |
| HC3 | “For better health, I often walk around or jog around the house” | |
| HC4 | “For better health, I often do stretching exercises at home (such as leg press, leg lift, joint movement, etc.)” | |
| HC5 | “For better health, I often do housework at home (such as cooking and cleaning)” | |
| HC6 | “For better health, I often do other exercises at home (such as tai chi, bodybuilding, strength training, etc.)” | |
|
| ||
| IES1 | “I love taking risks, although I know extreme sports may hurt me” | ( |
| IES2 | “Risk and extreme sports are inseparable” | |
| IES3 | “I think the risk is one of the features that attracted me to extreme sports” | |
| IES4 | “I love the moves which are risky in extreme sports more” | |
| IES5 | “Excitement is an inseparable part of extreme sports” | |
| IES6 | “I think extreme sports add excitement to my life” | |
| IES7 | “The excitement I feel while doing extreme sports is incredible” |
Figure 2Theoretical model.
Convergent validity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Augmented reality advertising | ARA4 | 0.800 | 0.942 | 0.670 | 0.182 | 0.159 |
| ARA3 | 0.992 | |||||
| ARA2 | 0.984 | |||||
| ARA1 | 1.000 | |||||
| Health consciousness | HC6 | 0.993 | 0.972 | 0.898 | 0.189 | 0.167 |
| HC5 | 0.632 | |||||
| HC4 | 0.991 | |||||
| HC3 | 0.996 | |||||
| HC2 | 0.634 | |||||
| HC1 | 0.997 | |||||
| Innovation resistance | IR8 | 0.746 | 0.957 | 0.793 | 0.202 | 0.173 |
| IR7 | 0.819 | |||||
| IR6 | 0.842 | |||||
| IR5 | 0.859 | |||||
| IR4 | 0.791 | |||||
| IR3 | 0.833 | |||||
| IR2 | 0.841 | |||||
| IR1 | 0.810 | |||||
| Interest in extreme sports | IES1 | 0.760 | 0.919 | 0.619 | 0.202 | 0.177 |
| IES2 | 0.716 | |||||
| IES3 | 0.846 | |||||
| IES4 | 0.784 | |||||
| IES5 | 0.845 | |||||
| IES6 | 0.831 | |||||
| IES7 | 0.712 |
Figure 3Measurement model assessment.
Figure 4Structural model assessment.
Discriminant validity.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IR | 0.818 | |||
| ARA | 0.406 | 0.948 | ||
| HC | 0.360 | 0.435 | 0.890 | |
| IES | 0.427 | 0.382 | 0.449 | 0.787 |
Model good fitness.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| TLI | 0.912 | TLI > 0.90 |
| CFI | 0.919 | CFI > 0.90 |
| RMSEA | 0.009 | RMSEA <0.05 good; 0.05 to 0.10 acceptable |
Path analysis.
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IES | < – | ARA | 0.125 | 0.170 | 0.032 | 5.320 |
|
| IES | < – | HC | 0.499 | 0.759 | 0.036 | 21.173 |
|
| IES | < – | IR | −0.114 | −0.192 | 0.040 | −4.829 |
|
| IES | < – | Interaction Term 1 | 0.454 | 0.120 | 0.006 | 19.244 |
|
| IES | < – | Interaction Term 2 | −0.596 | −0.153 | 0.006 | −25.270 |
|
Means variable is significant at 1%.