| Literature DB >> 36117594 |
Xiaoxia Zhu1, Zhixin Zhu1, Lanfang Gu1, Yancen Zhan1, Hua Gu2, Qiang Yao3, Xiuyang Li1.
Abstract
Background: Syphilis has spread throughout China, especially in Zhejiang Province which endangers the health and lives of people. However, the spatial and temporal epidemiological studies of syphilis in Zhejiang are not thorough enough. The temporal and spatial variation and the relevant factors of syphilis incidence should be analyzed for more effective prevention and control in Zhejiang, China.Entities:
Keywords: Bayesian spatial CAR model; China; Zhejiang Province; epidemiological trend; spatio–temporal analysis; syphilis
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36117594 PMCID: PMC9480496 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.873754
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Figure 1Epidemiological features of syphilis cases in Zhejiang Province, 2005–2018. (A) Monthly distribution of reported cases and incidence of syphilis. (B) Sex distribution of syphilis cases. (C) Age distribution of syphilis cases. (D) Clinical type distribution of syphilis cases. (E) Occupation type distribution of syphilis cases.
Figure 2Temporal distribution of syphilis monthly incidence in Zhejiang Province, 2005–2018.
Figure 3Spatial distribution of reported incidence of syphilis in Zhejiang Province, 2005–2018.
Results of global spatial autocorrelation for incidence of syphilis in Zhejiang Province, 2005–2018.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 0.2843 | −0.0093 | 0.0706 | 4.16 | 0.002 |
| 2006 | 0.2794 | −0.0099 | 0.0697 | 4.15 | 0.002 |
| 2007 | 0.3170 | −0.0092 | 0.0710 | 4.59 | 0.001 |
| 2008 | 0.2339 | −0.0100 | 0.0719 | 3.39 | 0.004 |
| 2009 | 0.3009 | −0.0098 | 0.0725 | 4.29 | 0.001 |
| 2010 | 0.2974 | −0.0096 | 0.0711 | 4.32 | 0.001 |
| 2011 | 0.3355 | −0.0094 | 0.0709 | 4.68 | 0.001 |
| 2012 | 0.3129 | −0.0116 | 0.0725 | 4.47 | 0.001 |
| 2013 | 0.3056 | −0.0114 | 0.0725 | 4.37 | 0.001 |
| 2014 | 0.3396 | −0.0109 | 0.0722 | 4.85 | 0.001 |
| 2015 | 0.2511 | −0.0119 | 0.0729 | 3.61 | 0.001 |
| 2016 | 0.1799 | −0.0127 | 0.0725 | 2.66 | 0.006 |
| 2017 | 0.2034 | −0.0131 | 0.0723 | 3.00 | 0.002 |
| 2018 | 0.2255 | −0.0111 | 0.0728 | 3.25 | 0.003 |
Figure 4Spatial autocorrelation analysis of the reported incidence of syphilis in Zhejiang Province, 2005–2018.
Retrospective space–time scan analysis of syphilis cases in Zhejiang Province, 2005–2018.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007/9/4–2014/9/2 | Lin'an, Fuyang, Xihu, Gongshu, Deqing, Shangcheng, Xiacheng, Anji, Binjiang, Jianggan and Tonglu | (30.23 N, 119.72 E), 48.03 | 1.62 | 4141.17 | <0.001 |
| 2005/3/30–2012/3/26 | Daishan, Dinghai, Putuo, Beilun, Zhenhai, Shengsi, Jiangdong, Jiangbei and Haishu | (30.25 N,122.20 E), 75.44 | 1.99 | 4121.73 | <0.001 |
| 2005/7/20–2012/7/10 | Songyang, Suichang, Yunhe, Liandu, Longquan, Jingning, Wuyi and Jinyun | (28.45 N,119.48 E), 61.73 | 1.68 | 1176.87 | <0.001 |
| 2005/1/1–2011/12/2 | Dongtou and Yuhuan | (27.83 N,121.15 E), 34.25 | 1.84 | 787.29 | <0.001 |
| 2008/12/31–2015/12/21 | Taishun | (27.57 N, 119.72 E), 0 | 1.76 | 340.52 | <0.001 |
| 2007/5/31–2014/5/9 | Luqiao | (28.58 N, 121.38 E), 0 | 1.43 | 211.08 | <0.001 |
| 2008/9/29–2012/7/14 | Longwan, Lucheng and Ouhai | (27.93 N, 120.82 E), 20.13 | 1.29 | 168.19 | <0.001 |
RR, relative risk;
LLR, log–likelihood ratios.
Partial regression coefficient estimates and 95% confidence intervals for related social variables of syphilis in Bayesian spatial CAR model in Zhejiang Province, 2005–2018.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 0.502 (−0.266–1.411) | 0.139 (−0.138–0.471) | 0.034 (−0.049–0.091) |
|
|
|
|
| 2006 | 0.405 (−0.242–1.284) | 1.164 (−0.016–1.400) | 0.088 (−0.006–0.222) | 0.046 (−0.051–0.130) |
| −3.560 (−7.698– 0.101) | 0.178 (−0.389–0.464) |
| 2007 |
|
| 0.045 (−0.069– 0.098) |
|
|
| 0.078 (−0.382–0.542) |
| 2008 | 0.184 (−0.336–0.543) |
| −0.011 (−0.064– 0.034) | 0.078 (−0.013–0.122) |
| −0.316 (−1.864–1.914) | 0.084 (−0.066–0.289) |
| 2009 | 0.456 (−0.114–0.970) | 0.595 (−0.060–0.913) | 0.017 (−0.040–0.087) |
|
|
|
|
| 2010 |
| 0.708 (−0.008–1.176) |
|
|
|
|
|
| 2011 |
| 0.058 (−0.059–0.192) | 0.002 (−0.033–0.055) |
|
|
|
|
| 2012 |
| −0.135 (−0.253–0.002) |
|
| −0.065 (−0.155–0.011) | 1.400 (−0.980–3.739) | 0.269 (−0.094–0.740) |
| 2013 | 0.050 (−0.258–0.304) | 0.058 (−0.189–0.307) | −0.012 (−0.091–0.036) |
|
| 0.440 (−1.612– 2.836) | 0.177 (−0.156–0.535) |
| 2014 | −0.065 (−0.233–0.316) | −0.154 (−0.375–0.041) | 0.005 (−0.070–0.051) |
| 0.022 (−0.058–0.063) | −1.452 (−3.717–1.393) |
|
| 2015 |
| 0.226 (−0.037–0.392) | −0.003 (−0.100– 0.054) | 0.001 (−0.021–0.015) | −0.154 (−0.209–0.030) |
|
|
| 2016 | 0.180 (−0.048–0.323) | 0.111 (−0.122–0.279) | 0.014 (−0.042–0.050) |
|
| −0.436 (−1.714–1.713) |
|
| 2017 |
|
|
| 0.025 (0.000–0.039) |
| −1.700 (−3.690–1.010) |
|
| 2018 | 0.131 (−0.054–0.312) |
| −0.010 (−0.099– 0.077) |
|
|
|
|
Italic indicates statistical significance (95% Confidence Interval does not cover zero).