| Literature DB >> 36117576 |
Hamid Soraya1, Sama Sheikholeslami2, Alireza Shirpoor2,3, Farideh Nezami Majd2, Roya Naderi2,3, Yousef Rasmi4.
Abstract
Background: Alcohol consumption in pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular abnormalities, but the mechanisms are unknown. This study evaluated the impact of ethanol exposure on the offspring's aorta structural, functional, and molecular alterations on postnatal (PN) both on days 21 and 90.Entities:
Keywords: Aorta; Blood pressure; Ethanol; Pregnancy; Rat
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36117576 PMCID: PMC9445872 DOI: 10.30476/IJMS.2021.91047.2205
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Med Sci ISSN: 0253-0716
Ethanol exposure-induced alteration of tumor necrosis factor-α, intercellular adhesion molecule -1, nuclear factor-κ and Endothelin amounts in the aorta tissue of male offspring on postnatal days 21 and 90
| Groups | Control 21 (n=8) | Ethanol 21 (n=8) | P value | Control 90 (n=8) | Ethanol 90 (n=8) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | ||||||
| TNF-α (ng/mg) | 152.62±7.4 | 518.73±11.8* | <0.001 | 170.30±5 | 664.84±17.60* | <0.001 |
| ICAM-1 (ng/mg) | 0.75±0.02 | 0.86±0.04* | 0.03 | 0.28±0.03 | 0.52±0.030* | <0.001 |
| NF-κB (ng/mg) | 32.01±3.27 | 56.9±4.6* | 0.005 | 22.57±2.20 | 49.80±2.10* | <0.001 |
| Endothelin-1 (ng/mg) | - | - | - | 48.40±3.30 | 79.33±2.85* | <0.001 |
The statistical differences between the control and ethanol groups were tested via an independent samples t test. Values expressed as mean±SEM. *Significant difference from the control group.
effect of prenatal and early postnatal ethanol consumption on data related to aorta wall of control and ethanol groups in postnatal days 21 and 90
| Groups | Control 21 | Ethanol 21 | P value | Control 90 | Ethanol 90 | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Aorta thickness (µm) | 117±5.61 | 228±38.31* | 0.014 | 167±5 | 260±14* | <0.001 |
| Tunica Media (µm) | 93±4.70 | 119±15.56* | 0.05 | 83.50±4.3 | 188±8.1* | <0.001 |
| Tunica Adventitia (µm) | 22.90±1.10 | 56.8±6* | <0.001 | 83.50±7.3 | 70.40±11.9 | 0.37 |
| Elastin Fiber Thickness (µm) | 2.52±0.02 | 4±0.25* | 0.044 | 3.62±0.12 | 6.25±0.79* | 0.015 |
| Fiber Interval | 5.62±0.22 | 5.25±0.61 | 0.55 | 7±0.3 | 10.25±1* | 0.014 |
| Entire elastin thickness (µm) | 26.63±0.82 | 37.50±3.4* | <0.001 | 32.62±1.98 | 65±9.21* | 0.004 |
| Elastin/Media | 28.25±1.13 | 37.41±2.84* | 0.011 | 39.23±1.66 | 44.09±4.6 | 0.315 |
| Entire SMC thickness (µm) | 52.77±1.86 | 51.25±4.14 | 0.73 | 46.75±4.1 | 90.93±1.86* | <0.001 |
| Media/Aorta | 80.04±1.38% | 59.01±3.55%* | <0.001 | 50.57±2.7% | 72.73±2.89%* | <0.001 |
| SMC/EFT | 1.95±0.12 | 1.38±0.16* | 0.021 | 1.56±0.11 | 1.53±0.12 | 0.86 |
| SMC/Media | 51.40±2.8 | 54.98±7.01 | 0.64 | 57.95±4.32 | 53.58±2.58 | 0.43 |
The statistical differences between the control and ethanol groups were tested via an independent samples t test. Values expressed as mean±SEM. *Significant difference from the control group
Figure 1The ethanol-treated group showed an increase in total aorta thickness, tunica media, tunica adventitia, elastin fiber thickness, fiber interval, and elastin/media ratio compared to the controls on PN21 and PN90 (Verhoeff’s van Gieson). Arrows show elastin layer thickness in different groups (×400).
Figure 2The arrows show the collagen accumulation in the intima region of the PN 90 ethanol treated rats, which appeared in blue color (Masson trichrome, ×400).
effect of pre and early postnatal exposure of mothers on blood pressure variables in male offspring of rats
| Groups | Control 90 (n=8) mean±SEM | Ethanol 90 (n=8) mean±SEM | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | |||
| Heart rate (beat/min) | 266.72±5.08 | 271.25±8 | 0.67 |
| Psys (mmHg) | 98.67±2.1 | 142.86±4.2* | <0.001 |
| Pdias (mmHg) | 87.60±2.6 | 114±5.2* | <0.001 |
| M.A.P (mmHg) | 91.42±2 | 121.20±4.7* | <0.001 |
| Dicrotic. Pressure (mmHg) | 94.37±1.7 | 127.15±4.7* | <0.001 |
| Pulse. Pressure (mmHg) | 12.18±1.29 | 29.74±6.1* | 0.48 |
The statistical differences between the control and ethanol groups were tested via an independent samples t test. *Significant difference from the control group.