| Literature DB >> 36117537 |
Xiang Liu1, Xiaotao Huang2,3, Wenping Qin1,4, Xiaoan Li4, Zhiwen Ma4, Hongxiao Shi5,6, Lanhai Li7,8, Changzhong Li4.
Abstract
Background: The degradation of alpine meadows has induced substantial losses of soil organic carbon (SOC) on the Tibetan Plateau. A commonly-used method for rehabilitating degraded alpine meadows in this region is establishing cultivated grasslands through sowing seed mixtures, but its impact on the biochemical stability of SOC has remained inadequately explored.Entities:
Keywords: Alpine region; Biochemical stability; C:N ratio; Grassland restoration; Soil organic carbon fractions
Year: 2022 PMID: 36117537 PMCID: PMC9480066 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14012
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 3.061
Soil bulk density (BD), pH, microbial biomass carbon (MBC) content and particle size distributions (mean ± standard deviation) at each site.
Different uppercase letters indicate the significant differences among sites (p < 0.05).
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||||
| DM | 1.33 ± 0.05A | 8.2 ± 0.1A | 596.6 ± 222.9B | 6.2 ± 0.6A | 57.4 ± 1.6A | 36.4 ± 1.4B |
| CG3 | 1.37 ± 0.07A | 7.7 ± 0.3B | 794.6 ± 242.7B | 5.6 ± 0.3A | 54.3 ± 3.7AB | 40.0 ± 3.7AB |
| CG12 | 1.45 ± 0.12A | 8.1 ± 0.1A | 1074.8 ± 162.0A | 5.9 ± 1.2A | 49.9 ± 5.9B | 44.2 ± 4.9A |
| CG17 | 1.36 ± 0.09A | 7.7 ± 0.5B | 1244.3 ± 189.4A | 6.8 ± 1.3A | 53.9 ± 4.6AB | 39.4 ± 4.1AB |
Figure 1Above-ground (A) and root biomass (B) at each site.
Error bars are standard deviations of the means. Different uppercase letters indicate the significant differences among sites (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Carbon content, nitrogen content, and C:N ratio of soil (A–C), above-ground plant (D–F), and root (G–I).
TOC and TN represent total organic C and total N, respectively. Error bars are standard deviations of the means. Different uppercase letters indicate the significant differences among sites (p < 0.05).
Figure 3Contents of soil labile carbon pool I (LOC I) (A), labile carbon pool II (LOC II) (B), recalcitrant carbon pool (ROC) (C), as well as the recalcitrance index of soil organic carbon (RIC) (D) at each site.
Error bars are standard deviations of the means. Different uppercase letters indicate the significant differences among sites (p < 0.05).
Figure 4(A–F) Relationships between the contents of soil labile carbon pool I (LOC I), labile carbon pool II (LOC II), recalcitrant carbon pool (ROC), and total organic carbon (TOC).
Figure 5Relationships between the recalcitrance index of soil organic carbon (RIC), and C:N ratios of soil (A), above-ground plant (B), and root (C).