| Literature DB >> 36117170 |
Marcus Stabel1, Karoline Haack2, Hannah Lübbert2, Meike Greif2, Pascal Gorenflo2, Habibu Aliyu2, Katrin Ochsenreither2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Anaerobic fungi of the phylum Neocallimastigomycota have a high biotechnological potential due to their robust lignocellulose degrading capabilities and the production of several valuable metabolites like hydrogen, acetate, formate, lactate, and ethanol. The metabolism of these fungi, however, remains poorly understood due to limitations of the current cultivation strategies in still-standing bottles, thereby restricting the comprehensive evaluation of cultivation conditions.Entities:
Keywords: Biofuel; Biomass usage; Hydrogen; Lignocellulose; Metabolites; Neocallimastigomycota
Year: 2022 PMID: 36117170 PMCID: PMC9484062 DOI: 10.1186/s13068-022-02193-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod ISSN: 2731-3654
Fig. 1Influence of temperature and pH on growth and metabolite production of N. cameroonii. a Influence of the temperature on the pressure during growth; b influence of pH on the pressure during growth; c influence of pH on the total amount produced metabolites during growth; d influence of pH on the relative amounts of produced metabolites compared to the total metabolite amount during growth
Fig. 2Effect of the bottle volume and agitation on metabolite production during growth on different carbon sources. a, c and e Show the absolute metabolite amounts produced, and b, d, and f are the relative amount of each metabolite to the total amount of produced metabolites. The samples are named after the bottle volume in ml (118 vs 250) and the agitation in rpm (0 vs 200). Please mind the differences in the y-axis between the different carbon sources
Fig. 3Effect of stirrer velocity on the metabolite production of N. cameroonii. The fungus was grown in a stirred tank reactor with straw as the sole carbon source. a Hydrogen evolution during two different setups comparing 0 rpm (black) vs 250 rpm (yellow) and 250 rpm (blue) vs 600 rpm (green). b Metabolite production during the second setup with 250 rpm. c Metabolite production during the second setup with 600 rpm
Dependence of metabolite production from stirring velocity
| ΔHydrogen [mmol] | ΔAcetate [mmol] | ΔFormate [mmol] | ΔEthanol [mmol] | ΔLactate [mmol] | ΔSuccinate [mmol] | Total [mmol] | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 250 rpm | Ø | 2.392 | 64.154 | 19.918 | 6.164 | 10.589 | 0.642 | 103.859 |
| SD | 0.393 | 5.438 | 0.820 | 0.249 | 1.067 | 0.049 | 2.860 | |
| 600 rpm | Ø | 2.852 | 52.231 | 11.706 | 6.913 | 5.641 | 0.232 | 79.575 |
| SD | 0.026 | 3.243 | 3.283 | 3.440 | 0.136 | 0.232 | 3.157 |
Metabolites are produced during stirred tank reactor fermentation of N. cameroonii G341 with straw as the sole carbon source depending on the stirrer velocities of 250 rpm and 600 rpm. Displayed are the final amount after 6 days (250 rpm) and 10 days (600 rpm) of cultivation. Ø is the mean value of the duplicate and SD the corresponding standard deviation
Fig. 4Effect of pH regulation on the metabolite production of N. cameroonii G341. The fungus was grown in a stirred tank reactor with straw as the sole carbon source. a Metabolite production and pH development during growth without pH regulation; b comparison of pH regulated and unregulated lactate and hydrogen production. pH from the unregulated fermenters is shown and pH for the regulated was kept constantly at 6.8; c metabolite production and pH development during growth with pH regulation
Dependence of metabolite production from pH regulation
| ΔHydrogen [mmol] | ΔAcetate [mmol] | ΔFormate [mmol] | ΔEthanol [mmol] | ΔLactate [mmol] | ΔSuccinate [mmol] | Total [mmol] | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| reg− | Ø | 1.509 | 17.490 | 5.785 | 1.520 | 6.238 | 0.706 | 33.247 |
| SD | 0.259 | 0.243 | 0.831 | 0.227 | 0.319 | 0.051 | 1.411 | |
| reg + | Ø | 2.972 | 46.898 | 12.261 | 3.841 | 6.926 | 0.685 | 73.583 |
| SD | 0.016 | 2.662 | 0.035 | 0.023 | 0.454 | 0.082 | 3.194 |
Metabolites produced during pH unregulated (reg-) and pH regulated (reg +) stirred tank reactor fermentation of N. cameroonii. Ø is the mean value of the duplicate and SD the corresponding standard deviation
Fig. 5Stirred tank reactor fermentation of N. cameroonii with cellobiose as carbon source. a Metabolite production. b Fungal pellets in the reactor at the end of fermentation
Highest yields recorded for each carbon source during stirred tank reactor experiments
| 5 g/l cellobiose: yield metabolite/equivalent glucose [mmol/mmol] | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metabolite | Hydrogen | Acetate | Formate | Ethanol | Lactate | Succinate |
| Ø | 0.285 | 0.806 | 1.084 | 0.377 | 0.428 | 0.067 |
| SD | 0.014 | 0.033 | 0.014 | 0.132 | 0.036 | 0.002 |
| 20 g/l straw: yield metabolite/straw [mmol/g] | ||||||
| Metabolite | Hydrogen | Acetate | Formate | Ethanol | Lactate | Succinate |
| Ø | 0.475 | 8.705 | 1.951 | 1.152 | 0.940 | 0.039 |
| SD | 0.004 | 0.541 | 0.547 | 0.573 | 0.023 | 0.039 |
Ø is the mean value of the duplicate and SD the corresponding standard deviation
Highest yields recorded for each carbon source during bottle experiments
| 5 g/l cellobiose: yield metabolite/equivalent glucose [mmol/mmol] | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metabolite | Hydrogen | Acetate | Formate | Ethanol | Lactate | Succinate |
| Ø | 0.491 | 0.855 | 1.155 | 0.031 | 0.165 | 0.082 |
| SD | 0.007 | 0.009 | 0.006 | 0.012 | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| 5 g/l straw: yield metabolite/straw [mmol/g] | ||||||
| Metabolite | Hydrogen | Acetate | Formate | Ethanol | Lactate | Succinate |
| Ø | 2.406 | 3.679 | 3.470 | 0.107 | 0.058 | 0.000 |
| SD | 0.114 | 0.633 | 0.127 | 0.151 | 0.082 | 0.000 |
| 20 g/l straw: yield metabolite/straw [mmol/g] | ||||||
| Metabolite | Hydrogen | Acetate | Formate | Ethanol | Lactate | Succinate |
| Ø | 0.866 | 1.013 | 1.454 | 0.000 | 0.322 | 0.100 |
| SD | 0.019 | 0.064 | 0.007 | 0.000 | 0.024 | 0.000 |
Ø is the mean value of the duplicate and SD the corresponding standard deviation
Fig. 6Metabolic pathways from Neocallimastix cameroonii. Adopted from [8, 9]. Primary and preferential electron disposal for hydrogen production is marked blue. Secondary cytosolic electron disposal is marked red. Enzymes are marked as numbers: 1. Embden–Meyerof pathway, 2. phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase, 3. malate dehydrogenase, 4. fumarase, 5. fumarate reductase, 6. pyruvate kinase, 7. lactate dehydrogenase, 8. pyruvate formate lyase, 9. alcohol dehydrogenase E, 10. malic enzyme, 11. pyruvate ferredoxin oxidoreductase, 12. ferredoxin hydrogenase, 13?. Possible bifurcating hydrogenase, 14. acetate:succinate CoA transferase, 15. succinyl-CoA synthetase. PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate; OXAC, oxaloacetate; MAL, malate; FUM, fumarate; PYR, pyruvate; AcCoA, acetyl coenzyme A; CoA, coenzyme A; Frdx, ferredoxin; SucCoA, succinyl coenzyme A
Hydrogen production through dark fermentation of wheat straw
| Pretreatment | Organism | H2 Yield | Publication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steam acid + enzymatic hydrolysis | 3.43 mol/mol sugar | [ | |
| CaO hydrolysis | Thermal pretreated anaerobic sludge | 114 ml/g total solid | [ |
| Dilute acid | 140.1 ml/g total sugars | [ | |
| Dilute acid + enzymatic hydrolysis | Mixed sludge | 141 ml/g volatile solids | [ |
| None | 2.406 mmol/g = 58.84 ml/g* | This study |
Comparison of pre-treatment, used organisms, and hydrogen yields of different studies using dark fermentation of wheat straw. *Conversion of mmol to ml hydrogen following the ideal gas law with temperature 21 °C and pressure 1 bar