Literature DB >> 36116669

How has the sustainability of countries changed after COVID-19? Evidence from the pandemics' first year.

B F Giannetti1, T Fonseca2, F Agostinho3, L C T Santos3, C M V B Almeida3.   

Abstract

The Covid-19 crisis has caused several social-related issues; the sanitary is, perhaps, the most significant one. Lockdowns and vaccination were implemented to fight the Covid-19 virus. From a sustainability perspective, Covid-19 has been considered a meaningful crisis driver that has affected nations' economies and social and natural capitals. The literature presents clues that effects appear to be different among countries. Recognizing its importance as public policies for sustainability, this study aims to assess how the sustainability of countries has changed after Covid-19, focusing on countries' economic power that reflects their capacity to face the crisis. A sample of 89 countries is considered, and 2019-2020 are set as base years for data gathering, which covers the first year of the Covid-19 crisis. Sustainability is conceptually supported and represented by a 3-D cube. The natural environment is expressed by the ecological footprint (EF) method, the economic capital by the gross domestic product (GDP), and the social capital by the happiness index. Results show that sustainability of economies was negatively affected after first year of Covid-19 crisis, but in different magnitudes, according to nations' economic power. While the sustainability of the wealthiest economies was slightly changed during 2019-2020 but maintained within the named 'useful-order' world (environmentally unsustainable, productive, and happy), the poorest economies pushed about 169 million people into the worst performance, reaching the 'ineffective' world (environmentally unsustainable, unproductive, and unhappy). Numbers highlight the inequalities of sustainability performance among countries, according to their capacity to face the Covid-19 crisis. The shield of the richest evaluated countries comprising 5 % of the world population is more powerful than the shield of the poorest evaluated countries carrying 67 % of the world population. Results claims for efforts to make different policies and provide economic support differently for countries, since although we are all under the same storm, but in different boats.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ecological footprint; Eight worlds sustainability model; Gross domestic product; Happiness

Year:  2022        PMID: 36116669      PMCID: PMC9474979          DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158766

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   10.753


  25 in total

Review 1.  A brief review of socio-economic and environmental impact of Covid-19.

Authors:  Muhammad Farhan Bashir; Benjiang Ma; Luqman Shahzad
Journal:  Air Qual Atmos Health       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 3.763

2.  Infectious disease, human capital, and the BRICS economy in the time of COVID-19.

Authors:  Devi Prasad Dash; Narayan Sethi; Aruna Kumar Dash
Journal:  MethodsX       Date:  2020-12-25

3.  A preliminary assessment of the impact of COVID-19 on environment - A case study of China.

Authors:  Qiang Wang; Min Su
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  The future of sustainability in the context of COVID-19.

Authors:  Donna-Mareè Cawthorn; Alexandra Kennaugh; Sam M Ferreira
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 5.129

5.  Poverty and COVID-19 in Africa and Latin America.

Authors:  Olivier Bargain; Ulugbek Aminjonov
Journal:  World Dev       Date:  2021-02-16

6.  A Tale of Three Countries: What is the Relationship Between COVID-19, Lockdown and Happiness?

Authors:  Talita Greyling; Stephanie Rossouw; Tamanna Adhikari
Journal:  S Afr J Econ       Date:  2021-02-19

7.  Political neglect of COVID-19 and the public health consequences in Brazil: The high costs of science denial.

Authors:  Monica Malta; Mario Vianna Vettore; Cosme Marcelo Furtado Passos da Silva; Angelica Baptista Silva; Steffanie A Strathdee
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2021-05-06

8.  Indirect effects of COVID-19 on the environment.

Authors:  Manuel A Zambrano-Monserrate; María Alejandra Ruano; Luis Sanchez-Alcalde
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 7.963

9.  Coupled human-environment system amid COVID-19 crisis: A conceptual model to understand the nexus.

Authors:  Priyanka Sarkar; Nirmal Debnath; Demsai Reang
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 7.963

10.  Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on environmental awareness, sustainable consumption and social responsibility: Evidence from generations in Brazil and Portugal.

Authors:  Eliana Andréa Severo; Julio Cesar Ferro De Guimarães; Mateus Luan Dellarmelin
Journal:  J Clean Prod       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 9.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.