| Literature DB >> 36116513 |
Esley S Santos1, Priscila C Silva2, Paulo S A Sousa3, Cristhyane C Aquino4, Gabriella Pacheco1, Luiz F L S Teixeira5, Alyne R Araujo6, Francisca B M Sousa2, Romulo O Barros7, Ricardo M Ramos7, Jefferson A Rocha3, Lucas A D Nicolau5, Jand V R Medeiros8.
Abstract
Diminazene aceturate (DIZE), an antiparasitic, is an ACE2 activator, and studies show that activators of this enzyme may be beneficial for COVID-19, disease caused by SARS-CoV-2. Thus, the objective was to evaluate the in silico and in vitro affinity of diminazene aceturate against molecular targets of SARS-CoV-2. 3D structures from DIZE and the proteases from SARS-CoV-2, obtained through the Protein Data Bank and Drug Database (Drubank), and processed in computer programs like AutodockTools, LigPlot, Pymol for molecular docking and visualization and GROMACS was used to perform molecular dynamics. The results demonstrate that DIZE could interact with all tested targets, and the best binding energies were obtained from the interaction of Protein S (closed conformation -7.87 kcal/mol) and Mpro (-6.23 kcal/mol), indicating that it can act both by preventing entry and viral replication. The results of molecular dynamics demonstrate that DIZE was able to promote a change in stability at the cleavage sites between S1 and S2, which could prevent binding to ACE2 and fusion with the membrane. In addition, in vitro tests confirm the in silico results showing that DIZE could inhibit the binding between the spike receptor-binding domain protein and ACE2, which could promote a reduction in the virus infection. However, tests in other experimental models with in vivo approaches are needed.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; Diminazene aceturate; SARS-CoV-2
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36116513 PMCID: PMC9476334 DOI: 10.1016/j.cbi.2022.110161
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chem Biol Interact ISSN: 0009-2797 Impact factor: 5.168
Molecular affinity parameters of diminazene ligand with 1R42, 2DDF, 2XU3, 6LZG, 6VXX, 6VYB, 6Y2E and 2OQ5.
| Complex (Protein-ligand) | ΔGbind | Ki | Amino acids that interact through hydrogen bonds | Amino acids that perform hydrophobic interaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DIM/Closed Protein S (6VXX) | - 7.87 | 1.71 uM | Ile973and Ala520 | Phe565, Thr393, Cys391, Leu518, Asn544, Leu390, His519, Asp979, Arg983, Leu517 and Ser974 |
| DIM/Open Protein S (6VYB) | - 5.8 | 55.64 uM | Pro463, Asp428, Ser514 and Thr430 | Phe515, Phe429, Pro426, Lys462 and Phe464 |
| DIM/Mpro (6Y2E) | - 6.23 | 26.97 uM | Phe140, Glu166, His41, His164, Cys44 and Thr25 | Cys145, Leu141. His 163, Ser144, Asn142, Met49 and Met165 |
| DIM/TMPRSS2 (2OQ5) | - 6.08 | 35.17 uM | Arg41, Ser195 and Asp189 | Gln192, His57, Ser214, Trp215, Glu218, Gly216, Gly226, Ala190, Val213, Cys42 and Gly193 |
| DIM/ADAM17 (2DDF) | - 6.0 | 39.76 uM | Gly362, Gly412, Glu468, Pro366, Cys365, Thr461 and Ser457 | Lys465, Lys460, Gly354, Val364 and Lys367 |
| DIM/RBD (6LZG) | - 5.92 | 45.54 uM | Arg393, Glu402, Glu375, His374 and Ala348 | Tyr385, His401, His378, Pro346, Thr347, Asp382, Asp350 and Asn394 |
| DIM/Cathepsin L (2XU3) | −5.14 | 171.15 uM | Pro59, Gly58, Asn62, Glu63 and Glu95 | Asn66 |
| DIM/ECA2 (1R42) | - 4.06 | 1.05 mM | Glu402, Tyr510, Glu406 and Tyr515 | Arg518, His374, His505 and Phe504 |
Power bond in best conformation.
Best conformation inhibition constant.
Obtained with Ligplot program.
Fig. 13D molecular docking of the protein–ligand complex with 6VXX protein and ligand diminazene illustrating the active binding site (A) with the respective hydrogen bridge interactions (B and C).
Fig. 23D molecular docking of the protein–ligand complex with 6Y2E protein and ligand diminazene illustrating the active binding site (A) with the respective hydrogen bridge interactions (B and C).
Fig. 33D molecular docking of the protein–ligand complex with 6VYB protein and ligand diminazene illustrating the active binding site (A) with the respective hydrogen bridge interactions (B and C).
Fig. 43D molecular docking of the protein–ligand complex with 2OQ5 protein and ligand diminazene illustrating the active binding site (A) with the respective hydrogen bridge interactions (B and C).
Fig. 53D molecular docking of the protein–ligand complex with 2DDF protein and ligand diminazene illustrating the active binding site (A) with the respective hydrogen bridge interactions (B and C).
Fig. 63D molecular docking of the protein–ligand complex with 6LZG protein and ligand diminazene illustrating the active binding site (A) with the respective hydrogen bridge interactions (B and C).
Fig. 73D molecular docking of the protein–ligand complex with 2XU3 protein and ligand diminazene illustrating the active binding site (A) with the respective hydrogen bridge interactions (B and C).
Fig. 83D molecular docking of the protein–ligand complex with 1R42 protein and ligand diminazene illustrating the active binding site (A) with the respective hydrogen bridge interactions (B and C).
Fig. 9Interactions for the Spike_DIZE complex. Frequency of hydrophobic contacts – (blue) chain A and (green) chain B. Frequency of hydrogen bonds - (orange) chain A and (red) chain B. The frequencies correspond to the end four of molecular dynamics simulations.
RMSF values for residues that showed interactions with ligands. Root Mean Square Fluctuation values for the residues that interacted with Dize ligands and chain A and B.
| Ligand_chain | Residue | RMSF (nm) |
|---|---|---|
| Dize_A | Tyr396 | 0.1163 |
| The515 | 0.1183 | |
| Glu516 | 0.1499 | |
| Ser514 | 0.1024 | |
| Dize_B | Tyr200 | 0.1198 |
| Ile197 | 0.1187 | |
| Lys202 | 0.0928 | |
| Asp228 | 0.1106 | |
| Asp198 | 0.1637 |
Fig. 10RMSF plots for chains A, B and C for ligand DIZE. Root mean square fluctuation (RMSF) - Complex Spike_Dize. Chain A (black), Chain B (red), Chain C (green). Graphical images were produced by XMGRACE software (Turner, 2005).
Fig. 11ACE2 S-RBD protein inhibitor screening assay. %inhibition of SARS-Cov-2 spike protein binding to ACE2. Data represent the means of the results in triplicate and are expressed as mean ± standard error of the means. *p < 0.05 in relation to Spike inhibitor control (black bar), followed by ANOVA and Tukey's test.