Jeanny Kwon1, Byoung Hyuck Kim2,3. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Munhwa-ro 282, Jung-gu, Daejeon, 35015, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, 20, Boramae-ro 5-gil, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, 07061, Republic of Korea. karlly71@snu.ac.kr. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. karlly71@snu.ac.kr.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the role of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) in neuroendocrine tumors (NET) treated with primary resection and systemic chemotherapy and guide to incorporate adjuvant RT based on individualized prediction. METHODS: We identified 4324 eligible patients using the SEER database. The most common histology was small cell carcinoma (SCC), followed by neuroendocrine carcinoma and carcinoid tumor. As the patients treated with RT were not randomly assigned, we performed propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: RT was administered to 1693 (39.2%) patients who had more unfavorable features [higher proportion of SCC, N2/3 stage, and poorly/undifferentiated (PD) tumors]. After PSM, old age, male sex, SCC, advanced T or N stage, PD tumors, large tumor size, and no use of RT were all significantly associated with a poor prognosis. After multivariate analysis, the survival benefit of RT was preserved (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.73‒0.91, p < 0.001). Exploratory analysis suggested that primary site, PD tumors, SCC, tumor size < 2 cm, or LN negativity were the factors for which adjuvant RT appeared desirable. Further, we proposed a novel scoring system using aforementioned factors; site-thorax/genitourinary, PD tumor, tumor size < 2 cm, LN negativity. Based on individually calculated scores, we found that RT significantly increased survival in patients with scores of 2-4 but not in those with scores of 0-1. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights the necessity of guiding adjuvant RT for these rare types of cancer. We proposed a novel scoring system to carefully recommend RT in selected patients.
PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the role of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) in neuroendocrine tumors (NET) treated with primary resection and systemic chemotherapy and guide to incorporate adjuvant RT based on individualized prediction. METHODS: We identified 4324 eligible patients using the SEER database. The most common histology was small cell carcinoma (SCC), followed by neuroendocrine carcinoma and carcinoid tumor. As the patients treated with RT were not randomly assigned, we performed propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: RT was administered to 1693 (39.2%) patients who had more unfavorable features [higher proportion of SCC, N2/3 stage, and poorly/undifferentiated (PD) tumors]. After PSM, old age, male sex, SCC, advanced T or N stage, PD tumors, large tumor size, and no use of RT were all significantly associated with a poor prognosis. After multivariate analysis, the survival benefit of RT was preserved (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.73‒0.91, p < 0.001). Exploratory analysis suggested that primary site, PD tumors, SCC, tumor size < 2 cm, or LN negativity were the factors for which adjuvant RT appeared desirable. Further, we proposed a novel scoring system using aforementioned factors; site-thorax/genitourinary, PD tumor, tumor size < 2 cm, LN negativity. Based on individually calculated scores, we found that RT significantly increased survival in patients with scores of 2-4 but not in those with scores of 0-1. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights the necessity of guiding adjuvant RT for these rare types of cancer. We proposed a novel scoring system to carefully recommend RT in selected patients.
Authors: Sinead M Brennan; Deborah L Gregory; Alison Stillie; Alan Herschtal; Michael Mac Manus; David L Ball Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-02-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: James R Barrett; Victoria Rendell; Courtney Pokrzywa; Alexandra G Lopez-Aguiar; John Cannon; George A Poultsides; Flavio Rocha; Angelena Crown; Eliza Beal; Timothy Michael Pawlik; Ryan Fields; Roheena Z Panni; Paula Smith; Kamran Idrees; Clifford Cho; Megan Beems; Shishir Maithel; Sharon Weber; Daniel Erik Abbott Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2020-03-09 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Curtis M Bryant; Long H Dang; Bruce K Stechmiller; Scott M Gilbert; Christopher G Morris; Robert A Zlotecki Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: Jin Young Moon; Seo Hee Choi; Tae Hyung Kim; Joongyo Lee; Ji Hoon Pyo; Yong Tae Kim; Seo Jin Lee; Hong In Yoon; Jaeho Cho; Chang Geol Lee Journal: Radiat Oncol J Date: 2021-12-08
Authors: Guido Rindi; David S Klimstra; Behnoush Abedi-Ardekani; Sylvia L Asa; Frederik T Bosman; Elisabeth Brambilla; Klaus J Busam; Ronald R de Krijger; Manfred Dietel; Adel K El-Naggar; Lynnette Fernandez-Cuesta; Günter Klöppel; W Glenn McCluggage; Holger Moch; Hiroko Ohgaki; Emad A Rakha; Nicholas S Reed; Brian A Rous; Hironobu Sasano; Aldo Scarpa; Jean-Yves Scoazec; William D Travis; Giovanni Tallini; Jacqueline Trouillas; J Han van Krieken; Ian A Cree Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2018-08-23 Impact factor: 7.842