Literature DB >> 36114393

Model Dynamics and Optimal Control for Intervention Policy of COVID-19 Epidemic with Quarantine and Immigrating Disturbances.

Chidentree Treesatayapun1.   

Abstract

A dynamic model called SqEAIIR for the COVID-19 epidemic is investigated with the effects of vaccination, quarantine and precaution promotion when the traveling and immigrating individuals are considered as unknown disturbances. By utilizing only daily sampling data of isolated symptomatic individuals collected by Mexican government agents, an equivalent model is established by an adaptive fuzzy-rules network with the proposed learning law to guarantee the convergence of the model's error. Thereafter, the optimal controller is developed to determine the adequate intervention policy. The main theorem is conducted to demonstrate the setting of all designed parameters regarding the closed-loop performance. The numerical systems validate the efficiency of the proposed scheme to control the epidemic and prevent the overflow of requiring healthcare facilities. Moreover, the sufficient performance of the proposed scheme is achieved with the effect of traveling and immigrating individuals.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Society for Mathematical Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Discrete-time systems; Fuzzy rules emulated networks; Impulsive disturbance; Optimal control; SqEAIIR model

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36114393      PMCID: PMC9483377          DOI: 10.1007/s11538-022-01080-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Math Biol        ISSN: 0092-8240            Impact factor:   3.871


Introduction

At the end of 2019, a new disease caused by the virus severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) or COVID-19 has been discovered in Wuhan, China. Thereafter, an outbreak of COVID-19 continued to spread around the world and affected economic, education, food security and health issues (Worldometers 2022). Several preventive measures such as social distancing, locking down, vaccination and so on have been recommended and utilized to counteract the epidemic (Giordano et al. 2020). Therefore, the negative effects have been notified such that businesses shunting down, unemploying, the ineffectiveness of online education and limited vaccination and healthcare facilities (Wei et al. 2020; Ourworldindata 2022). To minimize those effects, the development of a sufficient intervention policy with model dynamics for forecasting the epidemic is imperative (Deka et al. 2020; Aghdaoui et al. 2021). Infected cases of Mexico’s COVID-19 epidemic: Data from CONACyT (Government of Mexico 2021a) (Color figure online) Moreover, the epidemic of COVID-19 has already spread to Mexico in four waves from January 2020 until 23 February 2022. Figure 1 shows the record of daily infected cases recorded by COVID-19 DataLab CONACyT, Mexico (Government of Mexico 2021a). Causing by the omicron variant, the fourth wave has been detected since November 2021 and the peak has been observed as 70,000 cases approximately. Obviously, this peak is very higher than the previous three waves. As a result, the healthcare facilities have been over demanded (Government of Mexico 2021b, c). Thus, an effective intervention policy is rigidly required to control the epidemic according to the limited resources.
Fig. 1

Infected cases of Mexico’s COVID-19 epidemic: Data from CONACyT (Government of Mexico 2021a) (Color figure online)

By the formulations of nonlinear ODEs (ordinary differential equations), the dynamics of epidemics have been utilized by mathematic models for sufficient information to design the adequate intervention strategies (Leonardo and Xavier 2021; Giordano et al. 2021; Sun and Wang 2020; Liu 2021). The set of equations has been established by the developed SEIR model (Engbert et al. 2021; Jia and Chen 2021) when the individuals have been classified by the following states: Susceptible (S), Exposed (E), Infectious (I) and Recovered (R). By detailing classification, the mathematical model called SIDARTHE (Giordano et al. 2020) has been developed under the distinction between non-diagnosed and diagnosed individuals. Thereafter, the investigations to design the sufficient policy have been conducted such as the next–generation matrix optimization (Perkins and Guido 2020; Xie et al. 2020), the fuzzy fractional derivatives optimal control (Dong et al. 2020), threshold dynamics vaccination (Al-Darabsah 2020), optimal sliding mode control (Amiri-Mehra et al. 2019) and so on. Even so, the performance of those schemes is strictly related to the model’s accuracy and the intensive measurement of state variables. As a matter of fact, all state variables can not be easy to be obtained or monitored at all times under the concept of continuous-time ODEs (Auger and Moussaoui 2021). Thus, from the practical point of view, only some states are available at a daily interval (Zhan et al. 2021; Sooknanan and Mays 2021). Furthermore, immigration and traveling can be considered as a factor that causes the spread of COVID-19 according to the advanced air-traveling business (Government of Mexico 2021d; Abbasi et al. 2020). Thus, the impulsive disturbances caused by traveling people can lead the epidemic dynamics to be a class of impulsive control systems (ICS) when the disturbances are considered occurring on the impulsive axis (Villa-Tamayo and Rivadeneira 2020; Bachar et al. 2016; Ren et al. 2020). For a class of discrete-time systems, ICS schemes have been proposed by some works such that (Gao et al. 2011; Liguang and Shuzhi 2016). It is worth mentioning that those controllers for ICS have focused on linear systems with well-defined models (He and Xu 2015; Nieto et al. 2011). By considering optimal-control approaches with ICS, only limited schemes have been recently proposed such as a linear-quadratic (LQ) controller (Cacace et al. 2020), an adaptive dynamic programming (ADP) (Wei et al. 2020) and Pontryagin’s maximum principle (Abbasi et al. 2020). The performance of those schemes is promptly related to the model’s accuracy and data-fitting to select the model’s parameters. Furthermore, for the model-free approach, the neural optimal controller (Hernandez-Mejia et al. 2018) and the optimal control based on passivity (Hernandez-Mejia et al. 2020) have been developed but the full state observer has been strongly required. The focus of this work is to derive the intervention policy including vaccination, quarantine and precaution promotion with the optimal control aspect by utilizing only the daily data of isolated symptomatic infectious. Firstly, the conventional SEIR is redesigned as the SqEAIIR epidemic model which includes quarantined individuals and subgroups of infected individuals. By considering SqEAIIR as a class of discrete-time controlled plants, the control effort denotes the intervention policy and the output is the number of daily isolated infected individuals. Therefore, the parameters of SqEAIIR are determined by data-fitting with the fourth wave of the Mexico COVID-19 epidemic. Secondly, the affine equivalent model is established by an adaptive fuzzy-rules emulated network (FREN) (Treesatayapun and Uatrongjit 2005; Treesatayapun 2020) to represent the discrete-time manner of the epidemic by using only the daily data (Government of Mexico 2021a). The learning law is developed to improve the equivalent model’s performance with the convergence analysis. The proposed optimal controller is derived by the affine equivalent model which is linear with respect to the observed individual. Finally, the intervention policy is determined when the impulsive immigrating and traveling issues are considered as the unknown disturbances. Moreover, the limitations of resources such that vaccines, promotion budget and healthcare facilities are deliberated. The structure of this paper is organized as follows. The problem formulation and SqEAIIR epidemic model are given in Sect. 2 with a general class of non-affine discrete-time systems. In Sect. 3, an adaptive network FREN is utilized to establish the affine equivalent model by using only the daily data of isolated symptomatic individuals. The optimal intervention policy is formulated in Sect. 4 with the closed-loop analysis. In Sect. 5, numerical systems are provided to validate the proposed scheme altogether with the impulsive immigrating and traveling. In Sect. 6, the work is concluded and summarized. SqEAIIR flow diagram and controlled plant concept (Color figure online)

Problem Formulation

Mathematical Model of SqEAIIR Epidemic

In this section, a formulation of the extended SEIAR model called SqEAIIR is derived by integrating state variables of quarantined people and vaccinated individuals. The total population is categorized into seven groups as follows: susceptible S(t), exposed E(t), symptomatic infectious , asymptomatic infectious A(t), symptomatic infectious who isolated in hospitals and health-care facilities , recovered R(t) and quarantined Q(t) individuals. The flow diagram between individual groups of SqEAIIR is depicted in Fig. 2. Therefore, the dynamic model is mathematically governed as the following:and the infection force is defined as
Fig. 2

SqEAIIR flow diagram and controlled plant concept (Color figure online)

Parameters for SqEAIIR dynamics All SqEAIIR’s parameters are described by Table 1 and denotes the recruitment rate.
Table 1

Parameters for SqEAIIR dynamics

ParameterDescriptionParameterDescription
\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\phi _\mathrm{A}$$\end{document}ϕAAsymptomatic progressive rate\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\beta $$\end{document}βTransmission rate
\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\phi _\mathrm{s}$$\end{document}ϕsSymptomatic progressive rate\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\varepsilon _\mathrm{v}$$\end{document}εvVaccine efficacy
\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$r_\mathrm{A}$$\end{document}rAAsymptomatic recovery rate\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\mu $$\end{document}μNatural mortality
\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$r_\mathrm{s}$$\end{document}rsSymptomatic recovery rate\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\rho $$\end{document}ρProgressive rate
\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$r_\mathrm{i}$$\end{document}riIsolated recovery rate\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\delta _\mathrm{E}$$\end{document}δEIncubation periods
\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$m_\mathrm{A}$$\end{document}mAAsymptomatic mortality rate\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$z_\mathrm{A} $$\end{document}zATransition rate of A(t)
\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$m_\mathrm{s}$$\end{document}msSymptomatic mortality rate\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$z_\mathrm{Q}$$\end{document}zQTransition rate of Q(t)
\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$m_\mathrm{i}$$\end{document}miIsolated mortality rate\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$n_\mathrm{A}$$\end{document}nAInfection coefficient of A(t)
The parameters , and are non-negative control efforts or the interventional policy including vaccination, quarantine and precaution promotion such as social distancing and the use of face masks, respectively. It’s worth remarking that the main objective of SqEAIIR in (1) is used to validate the proposed interventional policy within the per-unit such that the works in Xie et al. (2020), Dong et al. (2020), Amiri-Mehra et al. (2019). Therefore, the controlled plant is considered as the unknown dynamics described by the block diagram in Fig. 2. Unlike the previous works such as Dong et al. (2020), Abbasi et al. (2020), Perkins and Guido (2020), in this work, the policy is determined by a model-free adaptive control without any requirement of the dynamics in (1).

Discrete-Time Equivalent Model and Immigrating Disturbance

The aim of this work is to determine the optimal intervention policy including vaccination: , quarantine: and precaution promotion: . In this work, the dynamics of SqEAIIR are considered as a class of non-affine discrete-time systems depicted in Fig. 3 when the control inputs are , and and the observed output is . k denotes the sampling time index with the interval 1-day. It’s worth emphasizing that from the practical point of view, can be daily obtained from the official databases such as CONACYT (Government of Mexico 2021a) and the immigrant population can be considered as the disturbance when indicates the date of immigration occurring.
Fig. 3

SqEAIIR as a class of unknown discrete-time systems and immigrating disturbance (Color figure online)

SqEAIIR as a class of unknown discrete-time systems and immigrating disturbance (Color figure online) To simplify, the equivalent model for the discrete-time system in Fig. 3 can be established aswhere is the unknown nonlinear function andBy generalizing the problem formulation mentioned above, the discrete-time system in (3) is reformulated as : where and : In this work, the disturbance is considered as the unknown signal but its effect can be monitored through at which can be obtained by the database. By this motivation, the data-driven equivalent model will be established by using only the daily data of . Thereafter, the approximated optimal controller will be designed by using the data-driven equivalent model.

Adaptive Data-Driven Affine Equivalent Model

Equivalent Model and Learning Laws

By utilizing the compact form dynamic-linearization (Hou et al. 2017; Treesatayapun 2017), it exists functions and for the affine dynamics which are equivalent with the system in (6) such thatAccording to the universal function approximation of FREN (Treesatayapun and Uatrongjit 2005; Treesatayapun 2020), it exists the affine model based on the analytic functions and such thatwhere denotes the estimated . Without loss of generality, can be expressed asThus, the equivalent model in (8) is rearranged asTherefore, functions and for are utilized by FRENs as the following:andrespectively, where is the basis vector of x(k) membership functions and and are adjustable weights. is the number of membership functions of FREN when the network architecture is illustrated in Fig. 4.
Fig. 4

Data-driven affine equivalent model (Color figure online)

Data-driven affine equivalent model (Color figure online) To improve the model performance by tuning all adjustable weights, the learning laws are established with the estimation error given asIn order to establish the learning laws, the cost function over the k-iteration is defined asFirstly, by applying the gradient search, the learning law of is obtained aswhere denotes as the learning rate. Therefore, let’s apply the chain rule along (8) to (14), it leads toThus, the learning law in (15) becomesSecondly, let’s repeat the same procedure as (15) to (17) with for , we obtainwhere is the ith learning rate. Thereafter, by applying the chain rule, we haveThus, the learning law in (18) is rewritten asIt’s worth denoting that the learning rates and can play an important role in the model performance. Therefore, the selection of the proper learning rates will be discussed next.

Performance Analysis

The performance of the learning laws can be guaranteed by setting and according to the following theorem.

Theorem 1

For the equivalent model proposed by (8) with the learning laws (17) and (20), the estimation error (13) is a convergent sequence when the learning rates and are designed by the following conditions:andwhere , , and

Proof

Let’s define the Lyapunov function asTherefore, the change of is derived asFor the proof thereafter, the analysis is conducted by two parts for and as the following: Part I (): According to the weight parameter , is estimated as such thatBy recalling (8), (11) and (17) with one step backward, we obtainSubstitute (27) into (25), it yieldsFor the convergence of the sequence or , it requires thatorIt’s clear that the condition in (30) is fulfilled asThus, the proof of (21) is completed. Part II (): For the weight parameters , the change of Lyapunov function is approximated as asLet’s recall (8), (12) and (20) with one step backward, we haveSubstitute (33) into (32), we obtainWith negative semi-define , it leads toConsidering (22) with (35), it’s clear thatfor . Thus, the proof is completed here.

Model-Free Optimal Preventative Policy

To prevent the inundation of individuals according to the limited resources of hospitals or medical institutions, the optimal interventional policy including vaccination, quarantine and precaution promotion is derived by the optimal control scheme. It’s worth emphasizing that the daily data of is only required and utilized in this approach. The long term cost function V(k) is firstly defined aswhere is a discount parameter, q is a positive constant and is a positive diagonal matrix such that for . By rearranging the cost function (37), it yieldsConsidering the cost function in (38) in the quadratic form, the following Lemma is conducted.

Lemma 1

If the general formulation of the control law U(k) in (38) can be rearranged by the vector K(k) asthen the cost function V(k) in (38) can be reformulated as a quadratic form such thatwhere P is a positive time-varying parameter.

Proof

Let’s recall (37), thus, we haveUsing (39) with (41), it yieldsSubstituting (39) into (7), we obtainwhereandBy utilizing the dynamics in (43), it leads towhere . Substituting (43) into (42), we havewhere . Thus, the proof is completed.

Remark 1

It’s worth to emphasize that the parameter P is a time-varying one comparing with the other quadratic value functions and optimization schemes (Abbasi et al. 2020). According to the result of Lemma 1, it’s clear that the relation in (38) can be rearranged with the parameter P such thatThus, Hamiltonian equation can be obtained asBy utilizing (49) and the equivalent model (7), it leads toConsidering , the control law can be derived aswhereTherefore, the performance analysis of the closed loop system under the proposed control law (51) is conducted by the following theorem.

Theorem 2

For a class of discrete-time systems satisfied the equivalent model (7), thus, the convergence of closed-loop systems under the control law (51) is guaranteed when and By recalling (48) with the control law (51) and the equivalent model (7), we haveFor the case of infected individual , it leads towhereBy consideringit requires thatorTherefore, we haveNext, let’s recall the closed-loop system in (43). It’s clear that I(k) is a convergence sequence whenThat leads toorBy the setting of mentioned in (37), it yieldsandBy utilizing (63–65) with (60), it leads to (53). Thus, the proof is completed. For the practical point of view here, and are unknown. Therefore, the affine equivalent model proposed in Sect. 3 is utilized. Thus, the gain vector K(k) in (52) can be employed as

Remark 2

For the conclusion, in this work, the equivalent model (8) is firstly established by utilizing the actual data. Secondly, the interventional policy is appointed by the optimal controller in Lemma 1: (39) when the gain vector K(k) is determined by (66).

Numerical Results

Parameters Setting and Model Accuracy

To validate the accuracy of SqEAIIR, the raw data from the Mexican government CONACyT (Government of Mexico 2021a) is utilized for the fourth wave of epidemic according to the omicron variant from November 2021 to 23 February 2022. By using the initial values given by Table 2 and the parameters represented by Table 3, Fig. 5 illustrates the plots of raw data and model’s results including , and A individuals. As a result, SqEAIIR’s dynamics (1) can predict and mimic the epidemic behavior. Furthermore, according to the data from healthcare institutes in Mexico such as IMSS (Government of Mexico 2021b) and ISSSTE (Government of Mexico 2021c), the maximum capacity of COVID-19 cases who need hospital facilities is displayed by the red dashed line in Fig. 5. The over-demand has occurred for the fourth wave of the epidemic caused by the omicron variant.
Table 2

Initial values of individuals (Government of Mexico 2021a)

CategoryNumber of humans
S(1)570,000
Q(1)1750
E(1)1136
A(1)1165
\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$I_\mathrm{s}(1)$$\end{document}Is(1)2376
\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$I_\mathrm{i}(1)$$\end{document}Ii(1)2578
R(1)5675
Table 3

Values of parameters for SqEAIIR dynamics

ParameterValueParameterValue
\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\phi _\mathrm{A}$$\end{document}ϕA0.12533\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\beta $$\end{document}β0.98714
\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\phi _\mathrm{s}$$\end{document}ϕs0.1429\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\varepsilon _\mathrm{v}$$\end{document}εv0.65
\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$r_\mathrm{A}$$\end{document}rA0.13978\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\mu $$\end{document}μ0.000023
\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$r_\mathrm{s}$$\end{document}rs0.1\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\rho $$\end{document}ρ0.2586
\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$r_\mathrm{i}$$\end{document}ri0.125\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\delta _\mathrm{E}$$\end{document}δE0.1923
\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$m_\mathrm{A}$$\end{document}mA\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$0.5m_\mathrm{s}$$\end{document}0.5ms\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$z_\mathrm{A} $$\end{document}zA0.13978
\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$m_\mathrm{s}$$\end{document}ms0.00011\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$z_\mathrm{Q}$$\end{document}zQ0.72195
\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$m_\mathrm{i}$$\end{document}mi\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$m_\mathrm{s}$$\end{document}ms\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$n_\mathrm{A}$$\end{document}nA0.65
Fig. 5

SqEAIIR fitting with raw data according to 4th wave of omicron variant (Color figure online)

Initial values of individuals (Government of Mexico 2021a) Values of parameters for SqEAIIR dynamics SqEAIIR fitting with raw data according to 4th wave of omicron variant (Color figure online)

Optimal Control and Intervention

By utilizing SqEAIIR and its parameters in Sect. 5.1, the proposed equivalent model (8) and the controller (39) and (66) are constructed and validated. Thereafter, the parameters of the equivalent model and the upper bound of control efforts are designed by using the following information: , , and according to Auger and Moussaoui (2021), Abbasi et al. (2020), Government of Mexico (2021b, 2021c). According Theorem 1, let’s select , thus, the learning rates are determined asandSecondly, all controller’s parameters are given according to Theorem 2 as followings: , , , and . Policy intervention response without and with applying controller with maximum capacity of hospitals (Government of Mexico 2021a, b, c) (Color figure online) Controlled and (Color figure online) Control efforts or policy intervention (Color figure online) The control effort is determined by (39) and (66). Thus, the response is depicted by the plot in Fig. 6 as the black line when the policy is initiated at Day 1st. For a case of delay, the blue line in Fig. 6 represents the response when the policy is initiated at Day 7th. As a result, the infected patients who require healthcare facilities are still under capacity. Figure 7 illustrates the equivalent model performance with the plots of and its estimated . Thereafter, the policy intervention is displayed in Fig. 8.
Fig. 6

Policy intervention response without and with applying controller with maximum capacity of hospitals (Government of Mexico 2021a, b, c) (Color figure online)

Fig. 7

Controlled and (Color figure online)

Fig. 8

Control efforts or policy intervention (Color figure online)

Immigrating pattern (Color figure online)

Immigrating Disturbance

Next, the immigrating disturbance is considered for individuals. In this test, let’s define the immigrating pattern by the plots in Fig. 9 according to the data from Government of Mexico (2021a, 2021d). That leads to the immigration of four individual groups as , , and for disturbances of susceptible, exposed, asymptomatic infectious and recovered individuals, respectively. It’s worth to remark that the impulsive index is denoted as for such that .
Fig. 9

Immigrating pattern (Color figure online)

Policy intervention response without and with applying controller with populations immigration (Color figure online) Control efforts or policy intervention with populations immigration (Color figure online) The uncontrolled response of SqEAIIR with the immigration effect is plotted by the solid-blue line in Fig. 10 when the response without immigrating is shown by the dash-dotted line in Fig. 10. Therefore, by applying the proposed policy intervention, the response is depicted by the black line in Fig. 10. Figure 11 shows the plots of the optimal intervention policy.
Fig. 10

Policy intervention response without and with applying controller with populations immigration (Color figure online)

Fig. 11

Control efforts or policy intervention with populations immigration (Color figure online)

It’s worth emphasizing that only is utilized for the controller and all impulsive disturbances are considered as unknown signals. Thus, the proposed controller can respond to the impulsive disturbances or immigration of individual groups

Conclusions

The dynamic model called SqEAIIR has been proposed to mimic the dynamics of the COVID-19 epidemic. The accuracy of SqEAIIR has been validated by the raw data collected by CONACyT, Mexico for the fourth wave caused by the omicron variant from Nov. 2022 until 23 Feb. 2022. From the practical point of view, only the daily data of patients who require the medication and hospital facilities are appropriately recorded and collected. For that reason, the discrete-time equivalent model has been established by an adaptive network FREN by utilizing only the daily data of symptomatic infectious who isolated in hospitals and healthcare facilities . Thereafter, the intervention policy including vaccination, quarantine and precaution promotion has been developed by the aspect of model-free optimal control. The proposed policy has reduced the number of infected individuals to prevent the overrun of healthcare’s capacity. Moreover, the effect of traveling on migrating has been studied by considering the immigration of each individual as an unknown disturbance. As a result, the proposed scheme has presented a sufficient policy to control the number of infected individuals. For the note of this work, the proposed intervention policy may be used as a guideline for the authority to control the epidemic.
  12 in total

1.  Observer-based adaptive PI sliding mode control of developed uncertain SEIAR influenza epidemic model considering dynamic population.

Authors:  Amir Hossein Amiri Mehra; Iman Zamani; Zohreh Abbasi; Asier Ibeas
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 2.691

2.  Discrete-Time Impulsive Adaptive Dynamic Programming.

Authors:  Qinglai Wei; Ruizhuo Song; Zehua Liao; Benkai Li; Frank L Lewis
Journal:  IEEE Trans Cybern       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 11.448

3.  Threshold dynamics of a time-delayed epidemic model for continuous imperfect-vaccine with a generalized nonmonotone incidence rate.

Authors:  Isam Al-Darabsah
Journal:  Nonlinear Dyn       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 5.022

4.  Optimal Management of Public Perceptions During A Flu Outbreak: A Game-Theoretic Perspective.

Authors:  Aniruddha Deka; Buddhi Pantha; Samit Bhattacharyya
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 1.758

5.  On the Threshold of Release of Confinement in an Epidemic SEIR Model Taking into Account the Protective Effect of Mask.

Authors:  Pierre Auger; Ali Moussaoui
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 1.758

6.  Harnessing Social Media in the Modelling of Pandemics-Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Joanna Sooknanan; Nicholas Mays
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 1.758

7.  A modified SEIR model to predict the COVID-19 outbreak in Spain and Italy: simulating control scenarios and multi-scale epidemics.

Authors:  Leonardo López; Xavier Rodó
Journal:  Results Phys       Date:  2020-12-25       Impact factor: 4.476

8.  Modeling vaccination rollouts, SARS-CoV-2 variants and the requirement for non-pharmaceutical interventions in Italy.

Authors:  Patrizio Colaneri; Raffaele Bruno; Giulia Giordano; Marta Colaneri; Alessandro Di Filippo; Franco Blanchini; Paolo Bolzern; Giuseppe De Nicolao; Paolo Sacchi
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 53.440

9.  Modelling the COVID-19 epidemic and implementation of population-wide interventions in Italy.

Authors:  Giulia Giordano; Franco Blanchini; Raffaele Bruno; Patrizio Colaneri; Alessandro Di Filippo; Angela Di Matteo; Marta Colaneri
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 87.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.