| Literature DB >> 36114307 |
Cha Cao1, Zuohua Zhu1, Chao Xu1, Wenbing Gong1, Yingjun Zhou1, Li Yan1, Zhenxiu Hu1, Chunliang Xie2, Yuande Peng3.
Abstract
The high cost of cellulase is one of the main obstacles hindering the large-scale biorefining of lignocellulosic biomass. Therefore, developing efficient method for preparation of cellulase is promising. In the present study, the production of cellulase by Trichoderma reesei, Trichoderma harzianum, and Aspergillus niger was optimized, and the synergistic effect of these cellulase on enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated ramie stalks was also evaluated. The maximum CMCase (Carboxymethyl Cellulase) and filter paper activity (FPA) produced by T. reesei reached to 3.12 IU/mL and 0.13 IU/mL, respectively. The maximum activities of CMCase (3.68 IU/mL), FPA (0.04 IU/mL) and β-glucosidase (8.44 IU/mL) were obtained from A. niger. The results also showed that under the premise of the same FPA activity, the contribution of β-glucosidase activity to yield of reducing sugar was greater than that of CMCase. Besides, cellulase produced by T. reesei and A. niger had the best synergistic effect on enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated ramie stalks. The highest reducing sugars yield (417 mg/g dry substrate) was achieved when enzyme cocktail was prepared at the ratio of 1:1, which was 1.36-3.35 folds higher than that of different single enzymes. The present research has provided a novel method for efficient preparation of enzymes consortium for enzymatic hydrolysis of ramie stalks.Entities:
Keywords: Carbon source; Enzymatic hydrolysis; Enzyme cocktail; Ramie stalks; Synergistic effect
Year: 2022 PMID: 36114307 PMCID: PMC9481857 DOI: 10.1186/s13568-022-01453-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AMB Express ISSN: 2191-0855 Impact factor: 4.126
The blends of enzyme cultured in different carbon sources and commercial cellulase
| Enzyme codes | Combination mode |
|---|---|
| 1 | 66.7% M1 + 33.3% M2 |
| 2 | 50.0% M1 + 50.0% M2 |
| 3 | 33.3% M1 + 66.7% M2 |
| 4 | 66.7% M1 + 33.3% M3 |
| 5 | 50.0% M1 + 50.0% M3 |
| 6 | 33.3% M1 + 66.7% M3 |
| 7 | 66.7% M2 + 33.3% M3 |
| 8 | 50.0% M2 + 50.0% M3 |
| 9 | 33.3% M2 + 66.7% M3 |
| 10 | 100%M1 |
| 11 | 100%M2 |
| 12 | 100%M3 |
| 13 | Cellic®CTec2 |
M1: Extracts of T. reesei cultured using ramie as carbon source
M2: Extracts of T. harzianum cultured using ramie as carbon source
M3: Extracts of A. niger cultured using wheat bran as carbon source
Cellic®CTec2: The CTEC2 was diluted by 50-fold, and CMCase, FPA and β-glucosidase activities are 3.45, 0.46 and 1.89 IU/mL, respectively
Fig. 1The effects of different sources of carbon (A), inorganic (B) and organic (C) nitrogen on the production of cellulases by different fungi
Fig. 2Effects of temperature on the production of cellulases by microorganisms
Fig. 3Effects of pH on cellulases production by T. reesei (A), T. harzianum (B) and A. niger (C)
Fig. 4Effects of incubation time on cellulases production by T. reesei (A), T. harzianum (B) and A. niger (C)
The optimized culture condition(temperature, pH and culture time) of A. niger, T. harzianum and T. reesei and their corresponding enzyme activity(CMCase, FPA and β-glucosidase)
| Culture temperature | 30 °C | 25 °C | 35 °C |
| Initial pH | 6.0 | 6.0 | 4.0 |
| Culture time (h) | 96 | 36 | 36 |
| CMCase (IU/mL) | 3.68 ± 0.42 | 1.72 ± 0.2 | 3.12 ± 0.52 |
| FPA (IU/mL) | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.08 ± 0.02 | 0.13 ± 0.02 |
| β-glucosidase (IU/mL) | 8.44 ± 0.6 | 0 | 0 |
Fig. 5The effect of wheat bran or ramie substrate on the enzymatic hydrolysis efficiency of pretreated ramie stalk with crude enzymes from different microorganisms
Fig. 6Enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated ramie stalks by different cellulase consortiums (The number of the horizontal coordinates corresponding to enzyme code of Table 1)