Literature DB >> 36114214

Multiclass classification of breast cancer histopathology images using multilevel features of deep convolutional neural network.

Zabit Hameed1, Begonya Garcia-Zapirain2, José Javier Aguirre3,4,5, Mario Arturo Isaza-Ruget6.   

Abstract

Breast cancer is a common malignancy and a leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women worldwide. Its early diagnosis can significantly reduce the morbidity and mortality rates in women. To this end, histopathological diagnosis is usually followed as the gold standard approach. However, this process is tedious, labor-intensive, and may be subject to inter-reader variability. Accordingly, an automatic diagnostic system can assist to improve the quality of diagnosis. This paper presents a deep learning approach to automatically classify hematoxylin-eosin-stained breast cancer microscopy images into normal tissue, benign lesion, in situ carcinoma, and invasive carcinoma using our collected dataset. Our proposed model exploited six intermediate layers of the Xception (Extreme Inception) network to retrieve robust and abstract features from input images. First, we optimized the proposed model on the original (unnormalized) dataset using 5-fold cross-validation. Then, we investigated its performance on four normalized datasets resulting from Reinhard, Ruifrok, Macenko, and Vahadane stain normalization. For original images, our proposed framework yielded an accuracy of 98% along with a kappa score of 0.969. Also, it achieved an average AUC-ROC score of 0.998 as well as a mean AUC-PR value of 0.995. Specifically, for in situ carcinoma and invasive carcinoma, it offered sensitivity of 96% and 99%, respectively. For normalized images, the proposed architecture performed better for Makenko normalization compared to the other three techniques. In this case, the proposed model achieved an accuracy of 97.79% together with a kappa score of 0.965. Also, it attained an average AUC-ROC score of 0.997 and a mean AUC-PR value of 0.991. Especially, for in situ carcinoma and invasive carcinoma, it offered sensitivity of 96% and 99%, respectively. These results demonstrate that our proposed model outperformed the baseline AlexNet as well as state-of-the-art VGG16, VGG19, Inception-v3, and Xception models with their default settings. Furthermore, it can be inferred that although stain normalization techniques offered competitive performance, they could not surpass the results of the original dataset.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36114214     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-19278-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.996


  17 in total

1.  BACH: Grand challenge on breast cancer histology images.

Authors:  Guilherme Aresta; Teresa Araújo; Scotty Kwok; Sai Saketh Chennamsetty; Mohammed Safwan; Varghese Alex; Bahram Marami; Marcel Prastawa; Monica Chan; Michael Donovan; Gerardo Fernandez; Jack Zeineh; Matthias Kohl; Christoph Walz; Florian Ludwig; Stefan Braunewell; Maximilian Baust; Quoc Dang Vu; Minh Nguyen Nhat To; Eal Kim; Jin Tae Kwak; Sameh Galal; Veronica Sanchez-Freire; Nadia Brancati; Maria Frucci; Daniel Riccio; Yaqi Wang; Lingling Sun; Kaiqiang Ma; Jiannan Fang; Ismael Kone; Lahsen Boulmane; Aurélio Campilho; Catarina Eloy; António Polónia; Paulo Aguiar
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 8.545

Review 2.  Breast cancer histopathology image analysis: a review.

Authors:  Mitko Veta; Josien P W Pluim; Paul J van Diest; Max A Viergever
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 3.  Deep learning.

Authors:  Yann LeCun; Yoshua Bengio; Geoffrey Hinton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Diagnostic concordance among pathologists interpreting breast biopsy specimens.

Authors:  Joann G Elmore; Gary M Longton; Patricia A Carney; Berta M Geller; Tracy Onega; Anna N A Tosteson; Heidi D Nelson; Margaret S Pepe; Kimberly H Allison; Stuart J Schnitt; Frances P O'Malley; Donald L Weaver
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Computed-aided diagnosis (CAD) in the detection of breast cancer.

Authors:  C Dromain; B Boyer; R Ferré; S Canale; S Delaloge; C Balleyguier
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.

Authors:  Hyuna Sung; Jacques Ferlay; Rebecca L Siegel; Mathieu Laversanne; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Ahmedin Jemal; Freddie Bray
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Molecular classification of breast cancer.

Authors:  Darina Vuong; Peter T Simpson; Benjamin Green; Margaret C Cummings; Sunil R Lakhani
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2014-05-31       Impact factor: 4.064

8.  A Dataset for Breast Cancer Histopathological Image Classification.

Authors:  Fabio A Spanhol; Luiz S Oliveira; Caroline Petitjean; Laurent Heutte
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Artificial intelligence in digital breast pathology: Techniques and applications.

Authors:  Asmaa Ibrahim; Paul Gamble; Ronnachai Jaroensri; Mohammed M Abdelsamea; Craig H Mermel; Po-Hsuan Cameron Chen; Emad A Rakha
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 4.380

Review 10.  Breast cancer development and progression: Risk factors, cancer stem cells, signaling pathways, genomics, and molecular pathogenesis.

Authors:  Yixiao Feng; Mia Spezia; Shifeng Huang; Chengfu Yuan; Zongyue Zeng; Linghuan Zhang; Xiaojuan Ji; Wei Liu; Bo Huang; Wenping Luo; Bo Liu; Yan Lei; Scott Du; Akhila Vuppalapati; Hue H Luu; Rex C Haydon; Tong-Chuan He; Guosheng Ren
Journal:  Genes Dis       Date:  2018-05-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.