| Literature DB >> 36114201 |
Kamel Guedri1, N Ameer Ahammad2, Sohail Nadeem3, ElSayed M Tag-ElDin4, Aziz Ullah Awan5, Mansour F Yassen6,7.
Abstract
Due to their unique microstructures, micropolar fluids have attracted enormous attention for their industrial applications, including convective heat and mass transfer polymer production and rigid and random cooling particles of metallic sheets. The thermodynamical demonstration is an integral asset for anticipating the ideal softening of heat transfer. This is because there is a decent connection between mathematical and scientific heat transfers through thermodynamic anticipated outcomes. A model is developed under the micropolar stream of a non-Newtonian (3rd grade) liquid in light of specific presumptions. Such a model is dealt with by summoning likeness answers for administering conditions. The acquired arrangement of nonlinear conditions is mathematically settled using the fourth-fifth order Runge-Kutta-Fehlberg strategy. The outcomes of recognized boundaries on liquid streams are investigated in subtleties through the sketched realistic images. Actual amounts like Nusselt number, Sherwood number, and skin-part coefficient are explored mathematically by tables. It is observed that the velocity distribution boosts for larger values of any of [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and declines for larger [Formula: see text] and Hartmann numbers. Furthermore, the temperature distribution [Formula: see text] shows direct behavior with the radiation parameter and Eckert number, while, opposite behavior with Pr, and K. Moreover, the concentration distribution shows diminishing behavior as we put the higher value of the Brownian motion number.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36114201 PMCID: PMC9481647 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-19124-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Figure 2Variation of on
Figure 3Variation of on
Figure 4Variation of on
Figure 5Variation of on
Figure 6Variation of Pr on
Figure 7Variation of Rd on
Figure 8Variation of K on
Figure 9Variation of Ec on
Figure 10Variation of Le on
Figure 11Variation of Nb on
Figure 12Variation of Nt on
Figure 13Variation of B on
Variation of skin friction coefficient with , , , and .
| 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.3 | |
| 0.3 | ||||
| 0.5 | ||||
| 0.7 | ||||
| 0.1 | 0.1 | |||
| 0.3 | ||||
| 0.5 | ||||
| 0.7 | ||||
| 0.5 | 0.1 | |||
| 0.3 | ||||
| 0.5 | ||||
| 0.7 | ||||
| 0.5 | 0.1 | |||
| 0.2 | ||||
| 0.3 | ||||
| 0.4 |
Variation of Nusselt number with ,Pr,K, Ec, Rd, , Nb, and Nt.
| 0.2 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.9230 |
| 0.25 | 0.9205 | |||||||
| 0.3 | 0.9180 | |||||||
| 0.35 | 0.9155 | |||||||
| 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.7210 | ||||||
| 1.1 | 0.8393 | |||||||
| 1.5 | 0.9180 | |||||||
| 2.1 | 0.9971 | |||||||
| 1.5 | 0.2 | 0.9180 | ||||||
| 0.25 | 0.9346 | |||||||
| 0.3 | 0.9513 | |||||||
| 0.35 | 0.9680 | |||||||
| 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.6247 | ||||||
| 0.4 | 0.7211 | |||||||
| 0.6 | 0.8189 | |||||||
| 0.8 | 0.9180 | |||||||
| 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.8362 | ||||||
| 0.3 | 0.8633 | |||||||
| 0.4 | 0.8907 | |||||||
| 0.5 | 0.9180 | |||||||
| 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.8822 | ||||||
| 0.45 | 0.9009 | |||||||
| 0.5 | 0.9180 | |||||||
| 0.55 | 0.9337 | |||||||
| 0.5 | 0.9 | 0.9180 | ||||||
| 1.0 | 0.9180 | |||||||
| 1.1 | 0.9180 | |||||||
| 1.2 | 0.9180 | |||||||
| 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.9175 | ||||||
| 0.3 | 0.9180 | |||||||
| 0.4 | 0.9185 | |||||||
| 0.5 | 0.9190 |
Variation of Sherwood number with Le, Nb, and Nt.
| 0.2 | 1.0 | 0.3 | |
| 0.5 | |||
| 0.8 | |||
| 1.1 | |||
| 0.7 | 0.9 | ||
| 1.0 | |||
| 1.1 | |||
| 1.2 | |||
| 1.0 | 0.2 | ||
| 0.3 | |||
| 0.4 | |||
| 0.5 |
Figure 1Flow geometry.