Literature DB >> 36112158

Development of a quality indicator set to measure and improve quality of ICU care in low- and middle-income countries.

Vrindha Pari1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop a set of actionable quality indicators for critical care suitable for use in low- or middle-income countries (LMICs).
METHODS: A list of 84 candidate indicators compiled from a previous literature review and stakeholder recommendations were categorised into three domains (foundation, process, and quality impact). An expert panel (EP) representing stakeholders from critical care and allied specialties in multiple low-, middle-, and high-income countries was convened. In rounds one and two of the Delphi exercise, the EP appraised (Likert scale 1-5) each indicator for validity, feasibility; in round three sensitivity to change, and reliability were additionally appraised. Potential barriers and facilitators to implementation of the quality indicators were also reported in this round. Median score and interquartile range (IQR) were used to determine consensus; indicators with consensus disagreement (median < 4, IQR ≤ 1) were removed, and indicators with consensus agreement (median ≥ 4, IQR ≤ 1) or no consensus were retained. In round four, indicators were prioritised based on their ability to impact cost of care to the provider and recipient, staff well-being, patient safety, and patient-centred outcomes.
RESULTS: Seventy-one experts from 30 countries (n = 45, 63%, representing critical care) selected 57 indicators to assess quality of care in intensive care unit (ICU) in LMICs: 16 foundation, 27 process, and 14 quality impact indicators after round three. Round 4 resulted in 14 prioritised indicators. Fifty-seven respondents reported barriers and facilitators, of which electronic registry-embedded data collection was the biggest perceived facilitator to implementation (n = 54/57, 95%) Concerns over burden of data collection (n = 53/57, 93%) and variations in definition (n = 45/57, 79%) were perceived as the greatest barrier to implementation.
CONCLUSION: This consensus exercise provides a common set of indicators to support benchmarking and quality improvement programs for critical care populations in LMICs.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Critical care; Delphi technique; LMIC; Quality indicators; Resource constrained

Year:  2022        PMID: 36112158     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-022-06818-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   41.787


  34 in total

1.  Prospectively defined indicators to improve the safety and quality of care for critically ill patients: a report from the Task Force on Safety and Quality of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM).

Authors:  A Rhodes; R P Moreno; E Azoulay; M Capuzzo; J D Chiche; J Eddleston; R Endacott; P Ferdinande; H Flaatten; B Guidet; R Kuhlen; C León-Gil; M C Martin Delgado; P G Metnitz; M Soares; C L Sprung; J F Timsit; A Valentin
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era: time for a revolution.

Authors:  Margaret E Kruk; Anna D Gage; Catherine Arsenault; Keely Jordan; Hannah H Leslie; Sanam Roder-DeWan; Olusoji Adeyi; Pierre Barker; Bernadette Daelmans; Svetlana V Doubova; Mike English; Ezequiel García-Elorrio; Frederico Guanais; Oye Gureje; Lisa R Hirschhorn; Lixin Jiang; Edward Kelley; Ephrem Tekle Lemango; Jerker Liljestrand; Address Malata; Tanya Marchant; Malebona Precious Matsoso; John G Meara; Manoj Mohanan; Youssoupha Ndiaye; Ole F Norheim; K Srinath Reddy; Alexander K Rowe; Joshua A Salomon; Gagan Thapa; Nana A Y Twum-Danso; Muhammad Pate
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 26.763

Review 3.  Clinical review: International comparisons in critical care - lessons learned.

Authors:  Srinivas Murthy; Hannah Wunsch
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 9.097

4.  Identifying a Basket of Surgical Procedures to Standardize Global Surgical Metrics: An International Delphi Study.

Authors:  Maria L Odland; Dmitri Nepogodiev; Dion Morton; Janet Martin; Abebe Bekele; Dhruva Ghosh; Adesoji O Ademuyiwa; Justine I Davies; Thomas G Weiser
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 13.787

5.  Testing the construct validity of hospital care quality indicators: a case study on hip replacement.

Authors:  Claudia Fischer; Hester F Lingsma; Helen A Anema; Job Kievit; Ewout W Steyerberg; Niek Klazinga
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Understanding and measuring quality of care: dealing with complexity.

Authors:  Johanna Hanefeld; Timothy Powell-Jackson; Dina Balabanova
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 9.408

7.  Development of actionable quality indicators and an action implementation toolbox for appropriate antibiotic use at intensive care units: A modified-RAND Delphi study.

Authors:  Marlot C Kallen; Marie-Jose Roos-Blom; Dave A Dongelmans; Jeroen A Schouten; Wouter T Gude; Evert de Jonge; Jan M Prins; Nicolette F de Keizer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Mortality due to low-quality health systems in the universal health coverage era: a systematic analysis of amenable deaths in 137 countries.

Authors:  Margaret E Kruk; Anna D Gage; Naima T Joseph; Goodarz Danaei; Sebastián García-Saisó; Joshua A Salomon
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Development of a quality indicator set to measure and improve quality of ICU care for patients with traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Jilske A Huijben; Eveline J A Wiegers; Nicolette F de Keizer; Andrew I R Maas; David Menon; Ari Ercole; Giuseppe Citerio; Fiona Lecky; Lindsay Wilson; Maryse C Cnossen; Suzanne Polinder; Ewout W Steyerberg; Mathieu van der Jagt; Hester F Lingsma
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Influences of hospital information systems, indicator data collection and computation on reported Dutch hospital performance indicator scores.

Authors:  Helen A Anema; Job Kievit; Claudia Fischer; Ewout W Steyerberg; Niek S Klazinga
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.