| Literature DB >> 36111187 |
Rongbin Yin1, Jianrong Xu1, Hongyun Wang1, Sheng Zhou1, Meng Zhang1, Geng Cai1.
Abstract
This study is intended for exploring the effects of the physical activity combined with extra ciliary-muscle training with different frequencies on children's kinetic visual acuity and uncorrected distance visual acuity, and eventually figuring out the optimal frequency of ciliary-muscle training for each physical education class. To do the present research, A total of 160 students aged 10-11 from a school in Suzhou (a major city located in southeastern Jiangsu Province, East China) were randomly selected and divided into control group (n = 33), 15-frequency group (n = 44), 30-frequency group (n = 40) and 60-frequency group (n = 43), and the latter three experimental groups participated in a specially designed physical activity plan based on the training principles of ciliary muscle, while the control group participated in normal physical activity as usual. The experimental intervention period was 16 weeks, and all students' kinetic visual acuity and uncorrected distance visual acuity were measured before and after the experiment. The result showed that the kinetic visual acuity of the students in the 30 and 60-frequency groups got improved significantly after the experiment (p < 0.05), with the highest improvement occurring in the 30-frequency group, while there was no significant change in the 15-frequency group and the control group; The uncorrected distance visual acuity of the students in the 30 and 60-frequency groups was significantly improved after the experiment (p < 0.05), and the improvement range in these two groups was similar. In contrast, there was no significant change in the 15-frequency group, while the control group showed a significant decrease (p < 0.05). Physical activity combined with extra ciliary-muscle training has a positive effect on improving children's vision; at the same time, ciliary-muscle training with different frequencies bring out different outcomes on children's vision improvement, among which ciliary-muscle training with frequency of 30 in each physical education class is the best choice to enhance children's kinetic visual acuity and uncorrected distance visual acuity.Entities:
Keywords: children; ciliary-muscle training; kinetic visual acuity; physical activity; uncorrected distance visual acuity
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36111187 PMCID: PMC9468474 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.949130
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Participants demographic characteristics (N = 160, M ± SD).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 44 | 40 | 43 | 33 | |
| Boys | 24 | 24 | 24 | 22 | |
| Girls | 20 | 16 | 19 | 11 | |
| KVA | 0.289 ± 0.246 | 0.268 ± 0.214 | 0.333 ± 0.304 | 0.274 ± 0.276 | 0.359 |
| UDVA | 4.875 ± 0.334 | 4.775 ± 0.306 | 4.807 ± 0.335 | 4.794 ± 0.302 | 0.766 |
KVA, kinetic visual acuity; UDVA, uncorrected distance visual acuity.
Experiment content.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Open motor skills | Basketball | Passing, dribbling, shooting, etc. | Total 4 weeks; 40 min each time | Three times a week | Control group without ciliary muscle intervention and normal participation in physical education classes. |
| Soccer | Shooting, passing, dribbling, etc. | Total 4 weeks; 40 min each time | Three times a week | The hourly value of ciliary muscle intervention in the experimental group was 3 s/time; since the ciliary muscle intervention was carried out as a motor exercise, the exact time could not be accurately estimated and depended on the content of the exercise. For example, the 60-frequency group performed volleyball reversal exercises with 40 people divided into four groups of 10 people at a time for 5 min each, for a total of 20 min. | |
| Volleyball | Matting, serving, passing, etc. | Total 4 weeks; 40 min each time | Three times a week | ||
| Table tennis | Throwing and catching balls, pairs, games, etc. | Total 4 weeks; 40 min each time | Three times a week | ||
| Closed motor skills | Run | Obstacle run, speed run, relay run etc. | Total 4 weeks; 40 min each time | Three times a week | |
| Jump | Height adjustment, long jump, etc. | Total 4 weeks; 40 min each time | Three times a week | ||
| Cast | Sandbag, softball, solid ball | Total 4 weeks; 40 min each time | Three times a week | ||
| Sports games | Emphasis on the far-sighted–near-sighted game | Total 4 weeks; 40 min each time | Three times a week |
Results of repeated-measures ANOVA on participants' kinetic visual acuity.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Time | 16.210* | 0.000 | 0.094 |
| Group | 1.727 | 0.164 | 0.032 |
| Time × Group | 3.405* | 0.019 | 0.061 |
*indicates significant difference (p < 0.05).
Simple effect analysis and paired-sample t-test on subjects' kinetic acuity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-experiment | 15-frequency group | 0.289 ± 0.246 | 0.520 | 0.669 | 0.010 |
| 30-frequency group | 0.268 ± 0.214 | ||||
| 60-frequency group | 0.333 ± 0.304 | ||||
| Control group | 0.274 ± 0.276 | ||||
| Post-experiment | 15-frequency group | 0.361 ± 0.248 | 3.701 | 0.013 | 0.066 |
| 30-frequency group | 0.486 ± 0.327ab | ||||
| 60-frequency group | 0.424 ± 0.324a | ||||
| Control group | 0.275 ± 0.200 |
ameans that compared with pre-experiment, p < 0.05.
bmeans significant difference in comparison with the control group after the experiment (p < 0.05).
Figure 1Comparison of the mean (M ± SD)kinetic visual acuity between the control group and the ciliary muscle training group with different frequencies before and after the experiment. *represents significant difference in intra-group comparison (p < 0.05), #represents significant difference in comparison with the control group after the experiment (p < 0.05).
Repeated measures analysis of variance on participants' uncorrected distance visual acuity.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Time | 14.076* | 0.000 | 0.083 |
| Group | 2.334 | 0.076 | 0.043 |
| Time × Group | 12.219* | 0.000 | 0.190 |
*indicates significant difference (p < 0.05).
Simple effect analysis and paired-sample t-test on subjects' uncorrected distance visual acuity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-experiment | 15-frequency group | 4.875 ± 0.334 | 0.776 | 0.509 | 0.015 |
| 30-frequency group | 4.775 ± 0.306 | ||||
| 60-frequency group | 4.807 ± 0.335 | ||||
| Control group | 4.794 ± 0.302 | ||||
| Post-experiment | 15-frequency group | 4.927 ± 0.311 | 7.095 | 0.000 | 0.120 |
| 30-frequency group | 4.937 ± 0.269ab | ||||
| 60-frequency group | 4.958 ± 0.280ab | ||||
| Control group | 4.685 ± 0.277ab |
ameans that compared with pre-experiment, p < 0.05.
bmeans significant difference in comparison with the control group after the experiment (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Comparison of the mean (M ± SD) uncorrected distance visual acuity between the control group and the ciliary muscle training group with different frequencies before and after the experiment. *represents significant difference in intra-group comparison (p < 0.05), #represents significant difference in comparison with the control group after the experiment (p < 0.05).