| Literature DB >> 36110978 |
Yiyi Ma1, Dongxiao Zhu1, Xinyan Chen1, Baihong Li2, Jun Zhu2.
Abstract
In order to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic value of echocardiography combined with serum creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB), albumin (Alb), and cystatin C (CysC) in patients with chronic heart failure (HF), 93 patients diagnosed with chronic HF in our hospital from March 2019 to January 2020 are retrospectively analyzed and included in the HF group. Another 100 healthy subjects who come to our hospital for general physical examination are selected as the control group. Echocardiography is used to detect the cardiac parameters of each group. The experimental results show that echocardiography parameters combined with CK-MB, Alb, and CysC have high application value in diagnosis and evaluation of patients with chronic HF, which can provide theoretical basis for improving the prognosis of patients with chronic HF through real-time monitoring of the above indicators.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36110978 PMCID: PMC9448626 DOI: 10.1155/2022/3986646
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contrast Media Mol Imaging ISSN: 1555-4309 Impact factor: 3.009
Baseline data.
| HF group ( | Control group ( | Good group ( | Bad group ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 52.92 ± 9.83 | 54.10 ± 9.22 | 51.76 ± 8.66 | 53.88 ± 10.68 |
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 46(49.46%) | 55(55.00%) | 24(57.14%) | 22(43.14%) |
| Female | 47(50.54%) | 45(45.00%) | 18(42.86%) | 29(56.86%) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.11 ± 1.77 | 25.01 ± 1.86 | 24.81 ± 1.70 | 25.36 ± 1.80 |
Differences in echocardiography parameters and expression of CK-MB, Alb, and CysC.
| Group |
| CK-MB (IU/L) | Alb (g/L) | CysC (mg/L) | LVEF (%) | LVEDD (mm) | LVESD (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HF group | 93 | 50.05 ± 10.60 | 33.39 ± 2.21 | 4.32 ± 1.07 | 36.41 ± 4.97 | 63.61 ± 7.15 | 50.55 ± 4.25 |
| Control group | 100 | 9.08 ± 2.17 | 41.90 ± 2.06 | 0.64 ± 0.67 | 63.18 ± 7.60 | 44.22 ± 2.61 | 34.46 ± 5.42 |
|
| 37.819 | −27.691 | 34.405 | −28.731 | 25.367 | 22.837 | |
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Diagnostic efficiency of each index.
| 95% CI | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | AUC | Cutoff value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The joint detection | 0.662∼0.858 | 76.50 | 79.30 | 0.782 | — |
| LVEF | 0.489∼0.716 | 69.20 | 65.70 | 0.602 | 50.00% |
| CK-MB | 0.461∼0.689 | 64.20 | 61.20 | 0.575 | 21.34 IU/L |
| Alb | 0.525∼0.747 | 51.80 | 61.50 | 0.636 | 36.62 g/L |
| CysC | 0.448∼0.686 | 57.50 | 59.60 | 0.567 | 1.95 mg/L |
Figure 1ROC chart of each indicator detection.
Differences in echocardiography parameters and expression of CK-MB, Alb, and CysC.
| Group |
| CK-MB (IU/L) | Alb (g/L) | CysC (mg/L) | LVEF (%) | LVEDD (mm) | LVESD (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good group | 42 | 39.95 ± 5.71 | 35.04 ± 1.71 | 3.43 ± 0.72 | 41.48 ± 2.10 | 56.95 ± 4.70 | 46.57 ± 1.63 |
| Bad group | 51 | 58.37 ± 4.86 | 32.03 ± 1.56 | 5.06 ± 0.67 | 32.24 ± 1.58 | 69.10 ± 2.83 | 53.82 ± 2.61 |
|
| 16.790 | −8.834 | 11.313 | −24.199 | 15.384 | 15.691 | |
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Figure 2High expression and low expression of CK-MB affect prognosis and survival.
Figure 3High expression and low expression of CysC affect prognosis and survival.
Figure 4High expression and low expression of Alb affect prognosis and survival.
Diagnostic efficiency of each index.
| 95% CI | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | AUC | Cutoff value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The joint detection | 0.764∼0.928 | 82.50 | 81.70 | 0.846 | — |
| LVEF | 0.593∼0.810 | 72.20 | 76.30 | 0.702 | 45.60% |
| CK-MB | 0.485∼0.714 | 67.80 | 67.40 | 0.599 | 45.64IU/L |
| Alb | 0.650∼0.850 | 69.70 | 74.20 | 0.750 | 34.24 g/L |
| CysC | 0.530∼0.759 | 64.70 | 69.10 | 0.645 | 4.29 mg/L |
Figure 5ROC chart of each indicator detection.