Literature DB >> 36110822

Comparative Analysis of Biofilm Formation on Materials Used for the Fabrication of Implant Supported Prostheses.

Ranjit Omprakash Pawar1, Priyanka Sadashivrao Narote1, Kailas Tukaram Gawai2, Manjiri Prakash Amte3, Sandeep Singh4, Subhash Sonkesriya5.   

Abstract

Background: Zirconia and other dental pottery, heat-restored polymethyl methacrylate, titanium and other metal amalgams, or a mix of these materials are utilized to fix inserts. It is important to choose a material that is resistant to bacterial colonization for implant-supported prostheses, but durability and aesthetics are important factors as well. Aim: Biofilm generation on materials used in implant-supported dental prosthesis manufacturing was an objective of this investigation. Methods and Materials: In this study, 90 discs were prepared. These discs were divided into three groups: group PMMA, group Y-TZP, and group CP-Ti. Each group consisted of 30 discs. As helpful materials, 30 discs (D = 15 mm, H = 3 mm) each were created from either monetarily unadulterated titanium (CP-Ti), yttria tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (YTZP), or hotness-restored polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA). The examples were cleaned as per acknowledged practices. The non-contact profilometer (NPFLEX, Bruker, UK) was utilized to survey the surface rougness of each disc, and the outcomes were accounted for as Ra (m). An assortment of gram-negative microbes, including Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Tannerella forsythia, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, and Tannerella albicans, were refined close by cleaned discs produced using heat-relieved PMMA, Y-TZP, or CP-Ti to see which type of biofilm is shaped best. CFU/mL was the unit of estimation (state framing units per milliliter).
Results: Y-TZP discs have a substantially higher Ra (349 41 m) than PMMA and CP-Ti discs. Some bacteria that have been associated with peri-mucositis and peri-implantitis may be less prevalent on Y-TZP or CP-Ti discs. Biofilm development must be considered while making implant-supported prostheses using Y-TZP and CP-Ti.
Conclusion: Y-TZP and CP-Ti are preferred materials for implant-supported prosthesis production because of biofilm development. Copyright:
© 2022 Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biofilm formation; implant dentistry; peri-implant; polymethyl methacrylate; titanium; zirconia

Year:  2022        PMID: 36110822      PMCID: PMC9469461          DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_7_22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci        ISSN: 0975-7406


  21 in total

1.  Initial salivary pellicle formation on solid substrates studied by AFM.

Authors:  M Hannig; A Döbert; R Stigler; U Müller; S A Prokhorova
Journal:  J Nanosci Nanotechnol       Date:  2004-05

2.  Microbial complexes in subgingival plaque.

Authors:  S S Socransky; A D Haffajee; M A Cugini; C Smith; R L Kent
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 8.728

3.  Marginal tissue reactions at osseointegrated titanium fixtures (I). A 3-year longitudinal prospective study.

Authors:  R Adell; U Lekholm; B Rockler; P I Brånemark; J Lindhe; B Eriksson; L Sbordone
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 2.789

4.  Clinical and microscopic findings in edentulous patients 3 years after incorporation of osseointegrated implant-supported bridgework.

Authors:  R C Bower; N R Radny; C D Wall; P J Henry
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 8.728

Review 5.  Mechanisms of dental plaque formation.

Authors:  A A Scheie
Journal:  Adv Dent Res       Date:  1994-07

Review 6.  The influence of surface roughness and surface-free energy on supra- and subgingival plaque formation in man. A review of the literature.

Authors:  M Quirynen; C M Bollen
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 8.728

7.  Microbial findings at failing implants.

Authors:  A Leonhardt; S Renvert; G Dahlén
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.977

8.  Do different implant surfaces exposed in the oral cavity of humans show different biofilm compositions and activities?

Authors:  Birte Groessner-Schreiber; Matthias Hannig; Alexander Dück; Michael Griepentrog; Dirk F Wenderoth
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.612

9.  Microbial aspects of failing osseointegrated dental implants in humans.

Authors:  G A Alcoforado; T E Rams; D Feik; J Slots
Journal:  J Parodontol       Date:  1991-02

10.  Bacterial adhesion of porphyromonas gingivalis on provisional fixed prosthetic materials.

Authors:  Mustafa Zortuk; Servet Kesim; Esma Kaya; Hatice Ozbilge; Kerem Kiliç; Ozlem Cölgeçen
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2010
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.