| Literature DB >> 36110550 |
Jing Sun1,2, Peng-Fei Liu1,3, Jia-Ni Liu1, Cong Lu1, Li-Tao Tong1, Yong-Quan Wang1, Jia-Meng Liu1, Bei Fan1, Feng-Zhong Wang1.
Abstract
As a dietary and medicinal plant, Dendrobium fimbriatum (DF) is widely utilized in China for improving stomach disease for centuries. However, the underlying mechanisms against gastric mucosal injury have not been fully disclosed. Here, metabolomics and proteomics were integrated to clarify the in-depth molecular mechanisms using cyclophosphamide-induced gastric mucosal injury model in mice. As a result, three metabolic pathways, such as creatine metabolism, arginine and proline metabolism, and pyrimidine metabolism were hit contributing to DF protective benefits. Additionally, γ-L-glutamyl-putrescine, cytosine, and thymine might be the eligible biomarkers to reflect gastric mucosal injury tatus, and DF anti-gastric mucosal injury effects were mediated by the so-called target proteins such as Ckm, Arg1, Ctps2, Pycr3, and Cmpk2. This finding provided meaningful information for the molecular mechanisms of DF and also offered a promising strategy to clarify the therapeutic mechanisms of functional foods.Entities:
Keywords: Dendrobium fimbriatum; gastric mucosal injury; metabolomics; pathway; proteomics
Year: 2022 PMID: 36110550 PMCID: PMC9468276 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.948987
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.988
FIGURE 1Histological images of hematoxylin and eosin-stained gastric mucosa (magnification ×200). (A) Control group; (B) Model group; (C) OPZ group; (D) DF group. (a) Epithelial cell loss; (b) inflammatory cell infiltration; (c) disorganized glandular structures; (d) gastric mucosal hemorrhage.
FIGURE 2Effect of DF on the contents of MDA (A), NO (B), PGE2 (C), NF-κB (D), as and 5-HT (E) in stomach of mice subjected to CTX-induced gastric ulcer. Data was expressed as mean ± SD (n = 10). Data with different letters showed significant difference from each other (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001).
FIGURE 3Protein interaction network diagram, red represents down-regulated protein and green represents up-regulated protein.
FIGURE 4Pie chart of GO secondary classification statistics of all detected proteins.
FIGURE 5KEGG enrichment bubble chart for the differential proteins-involved pathways.
FIGURE 6KEGG pathway map of differential metabolites and protein. The box in the figure represents the gene product and the circle represents the metabolite. All gene products in the blue background box reflect background proteins, Ckm, Arg1, and Ctps2 are up-regulated proteins, Pycr3 and Cmpk2 are down-regulated proteins. The metabolites seen in the red/green circles are detected differential metabolites, the red circles indicate up-regulated metabolites, and the green circles indicate down-regulated metabolites.
PRM relative quantitative verification results of some differential proteins.
| Peptide | Name | Model | FC(Model/Control) | DF | FC (DF/Model) | OPZ | FC (OPZ/Model) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DIVYIGLR | Arg1 | ↑# | 2.28 | ↓** | 0.47 | Statistically Insignificant | 1.44 |
| ANEELAGVVAEVQK | Arg1 | ↑# | 1.93 | ↓* | 0.41 | Statistically Insignificant | 1.37 |
| DLFDPIIQDR | Ckm | ↑### | 1.92 | ↓* | 0.48 | Statistically Insignificant | 0.57 |
| VLTPDLYNK | Ckm | ↑### | 2.11 | ↓** | 0.55 | Statistically Insignificant | 0.46 |
| SYALCVPLAPGEGCGPR | Cmpk2 | ↓## | 0.60 | ↑* | 1.86 | ↑** | 1.78 |
| IAAQTLLGTAK | Pycr3 | ↓# | 0.44 | ↑** | 1.98 | ↑** | 1.93 |
| GLGLSPDLIVCR | Ctps2 | ↑### | 1.79 | ↓** | 0.47 | ↓* | 0.37 |
# p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001 compared with control; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 compared with model; “↑”, increase in signal; “↓”, decrease in signal; Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 5).