| Literature DB >> 36110299 |
Tianshu Yang1, Jinsong Yang1, Kai Tang1, Wenbo Zhi1, Rong Chen1, Haisheng Tan2.
Abstract
In this study, lactic acid bacteria strains (HCS-01, HCS-05, HCS-07, HCW-08, and HCW-09) derived from the gastrointestinal tract of Hainan black goat were evaluated for their antioxidant capacity in vitro, and the lactic acid bacteria with strong antioxidant capacity were screened for application to improve the aerobic stability of total mixed ration (TMR). The results showed that all the tested lactic acid bacteria had a certain tolerance to hydrogen peroxide. By comprehensively comparing the scavenging abilities of fermentation supernatants, whole cell bacterial suspensions and cell contents of five lactic acid bacteria strains to 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazine (DPPH), hydroxyl radicals and superoxide anions, and their antioxidant enzyme activity, it was found that Lactobacillus fermentum HCS-05 and Lactobacillus plantarum HCW-08 have the strongest comprehensive antioxidant capacity, and their scavenging capacity for various free radicals has reached more than 60%. Using strains HCS-05, HCW-08 and laboratory-preserved Lactobacillus plantarum HDX1 fermented TMR, the fermentation quality and aerobic stability of the feed after 60 days of fermentation were significantly higher than those of the blank treatment group. The effect of mixed strains HCS-05 and HCS-08 for TMR fermentation was the best (P < 0.05). At the same time, the fermentation effect of Lactobacillus plantarum HDX1 on TMR was significantly lower than that of the selected lactic acid bacteria from the gastrointestinal tract of Hainan black goats (P < 0.05). The results show that the test strain can significantly improve the aerobic stability of the fermented feeds.Entities:
Keywords: Hainan black goat; aerobic stability; antioxidant; lactic acid bacteria; total mixed ration
Year: 2022 PMID: 36110299 PMCID: PMC9468487 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.974925
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 6.064
Treatment method of total mixed ration (TMR).
| No. | Approach | Addition amount/kg | Amount/Pack | The amount of lactic acid bacteria added |
| I | TMR | 1.0 | 18 | – |
| II | TMR + HCS-05 | 1.0 | 18 | 0.1% |
| III | TMR + HCS-08 | 1.0 | 18 | 0.1% |
| VI | TMR + HCS-05 + HCS-08 | 1.0 | 18 | 0.1% |
| V | TMR + HDX1 | 1.0 | 18 | 0.1% |
FIGURE 1Growth of strains at different concentrations of H2O2. (A) 12 h, (B) 24 h.
FIGURE 22,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazine (DPPH) free radical scavenging ability of lactic acid bacteria. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different components of the same strain (P < 0.05); different capital letters indicate significant differences among the same components of different strains (P < 0.05).
FIGURE 3Hydroxyl radical scavenging ability of lactic acid bacteria. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different components of the same strain (P < 0.05); different capital letters indicate significant differences among the same components of different strains (P < 0.05).
FIGURE 4Superoxide anion free radical scavenging ability of lactic acid bacteria. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different components of the same strain (P < 0.05); different capital letters indicate significant differences among the same components of different strains (P < 0.05).
Enzyme activity of each component of lactic acid bacteria.
| Enzyme activity/(U/mL) | Components | Strains | ||||
|
| ||||||
| HCS-01 | HCS-05 | HCS-07 | HCW-08 | HCW-09 | ||
| Supernatant fluid | 9.10 ± 0.33Ca | 15.49 ± 0.61Aa | 11.30 ± 0.84Ba | 9.47 ± 0.41Ca | 9.78 ± 0.41Ca | |
| SOD | Intact cells | 2.09 ± 0.17Cb | 3.33 ± 0.37Bb | 2.46 ± 0.25Cb | 3.48 ± 0.18Bb | 4.15 ± 0.16Ab |
| Cell contents | 2.45 ± 0.28Bb | 1.52 ± 0.06Cc | 2.13 ± 0.20Bb | 3.54 ± 0.34Ab | 1.54 ± 0.05Cc | |
| – | – | – | – | – | ||
| Supernatant fluid | – | – | – | – | – | |
| CAT | Intact cells | – | – | – | – | – |
| Cell contents | 1.21 ± 0.28ABb | 0.86 ± 0.16AB | – | 1.60 ± 0.61A | 0.44 ± 0.10B | |
| – | – | – | – | – | ||
| supernatant fluid | – | – | – | 0.03 ± 0.01 | – | |
| GSH-PX | intact cells | – | – | – | – | – |
| cell contents | – | – | – | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.08 ± 0.01 | |
Different capital letters indicate significant differences among strains (P < 0.05); different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different components of the same strain (P < 0.05).
Nutrient and fermentation quality of total mixed ration (TMR) after 60 days of fermentation.
| Group | ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Initial value | I | II | III | VI | V | |
| pH | 6.78 ± 0.02a | 4.51 ± 0.02b | 4.09 ± 0.07c | 4.10 ± 0.06c | 4.05 ± 0.17c | 4.23 ± 0.09c |
| DM (%FM) | 43.10 ± 0.02a | 38.23 ± 0.68c | 39.51 ± 1.74b | 38.44 ± 2.05c | 39.69 ± 1.83b | 38.47 ± 1.07c |
| CP (%DM) | 15.28 ± 1.57 | 14.18 ± 2.33 | 14.86 ± 1.93 | 15.09 ± 2.05 | 15.13 ± 2.12 | 14.73 ± 1.97 |
| WSC (%DM) | 16.15 ± 0.89a | 7.53 ± 0.87b | 6.59 ± 0.91d | 6.86 ± 0.45c | 6.65 ± 0.43d | 7.05 ± 0.67c |
| AN (%TN) | – | 3.32 ± 0.77 | 3.24 ± 0.23 | 3.27 ± 0.59 | 3.16 ± 0.65 | 3.30 ± 0.43 |
| LAB (lg CFU/g) | 4.16 ± 0.15d | 7.37 ± 0.16c | 8.16 ± 0.29b | 8.21 ± 0.21b | 8.52 ± 0.15a | 7.93 ± 0.18b |
| Yeast (lg CFU/g) | 6.40 ± 0.32a | 3.21 ± 0.06b | 3.12 ± 0.15b | 3.15 ± 0.08b | 2.98 ± 0.19b | 3.19 ± 0.15b |
| Aerobic Bacteria (lg CFU/g) | 7.21 ± 0.29a | 3.54 ± 0.18b | 1.70 ± 0.05c | 1.74 ± 0.05c | 1.59 ± 0.06c | 1.82 ± 0.11c |
| Mold (g CFU/g) | 6.11 ± 0.10a | 1.67 ± 0.58b | ND | ND | ND | 1.00 ± 0.02b |
Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between peer data (P < 0.05), ND, not detected; DM, dry matter; CP, crude protein; WSC, water soluble carbohydrates; AN, ammonia nitrogen.
FIGURE 5Changes in microbial of fermented total mixed ration (FTMR) during the aerobic period. (A) Lactic acid bacteria, (B) yeasts, (C) aerobic bacteria, and (D) molds.
FIGURE 6Changes in pH and microbial of fermented total mixed ration (FTMR) during the aerobic period.