Literature DB >> 36108246

Occult Fracture of the Fibula: One Case Report.

Shuliang Zhang1,2,3,4,5, Hongfeng Sheng1,2,3,4,5, Bin Xu1,2,3,4,5, Yangdahao Chen1,2,3,4,5, Yangjun Lao1,2,3,4,5.   

Abstract

Occult fibula fracture in adults is a fairly rare disease. It is easy to overlook or misdiagnose, resulting in delayed treatment and serious sequelae, as well as medical conflicts. We describe a case of concealed distal fibula fracture. The radiograph revealed no visible abnormalities at first. Finally, the occult fibula fracture was confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging and the patient received timely, correct, and reasonable treatment after diagnosis. This case raises our awareness of occult fibula fractures that are easily missed, and it deserves to be shared.
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the National Association of Orthopaedic Nurses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36108246      PMCID: PMC9512230          DOI: 10.1097/NOR.0000000000000891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Nurs        ISSN: 0744-6020            Impact factor:   0.988


Introduction

Occult fracture, usually seen in the hip, is an uncommon injury after trauma (Grammatopoulos et al., 2018). Few literature studies have reported adult occult fibular fractures and are often overlooked, especially in patients without a clear trauma history, which leads to delayed treatment and catastrophic consequences, even though medical conflicts have been reported. We report a case of concealed distal fibula fracture, for which diagnosis was missed at first. Fortunately, the patient underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in time and received reasonable treatment after correct diagnosis. This case raised our awareness of occult fibula fractures that are easily missed, and it deserves to be shared.

Case Presentation

An adult male patient came to our orthopaedic clinic. He stated that he had a sudden onset of pain in his right ankle without any other external cause 2 weeks prior to the clinic visit. He denied any history of ankle injury. He also denied a history of fever or recent infection, weight loss, or night pain. Physical examination showed that there was tenderness and percussion pain in the right lateral malleolus. No swelling or soft-tissue masses were found in his ankle. An x-ray examination was performed and revealed no obvious signs of abnormality (see Figures 1A and 1B). Considering that the patient was a delivery man, the outpatient physician diagnosed a soft-tissue strain of the right ankle joint. Therapeutic measures included topical ointments and oral analgesics. One week later, the patient returned to the clinic and complained of pain in the right lateral malleolus without relief. Physical examination showed there was pressure pain in the anterior and posterior parts of the right lateral malleolus. Combined with the normal x-ray examination last time, the diagnosis made by the outpatient physician this time was the injury of the anterior tibiofibular ligament and the posterior tibiofibular ligament. Therefore, an MRI scan was ordered and plaster fixation was recommended. The patient initially refused to undergo the MRI examination. Hence, only the cast fixation was performed. Five days later, the patient was still in pain and came back to the orthopaedic clinic for an MRI examination. The MRI scan showed a distal fracture of the right fibula with good alignment (see Figures 1C and 1D).
Figure 1.

(A, B) Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the right fibula showing no abnormalities. (C, D) The magnetic resonance imaging scan showing a fracture of the right fibula.

(A, B) Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the right fibula showing no abnormalities. (C, D) The magnetic resonance imaging scan showing a fracture of the right fibula.

Management

Conservative treatment was recommended. The outpatient orthopaedic surgeon offered plaster fixation and oral painkillers once more. The plaster fixation on the right ankle was removed after one and a half month. Furthermore, the patient was advised not to put weight on the right foot for another one and a half months to avoid fracture displacement and to follow up regularly. The patient's occult fibula fracture was eventually healed, and the ankle function recovered as well.

Nursing Measures

The patient's nursing care of the medial malleolus, lateral malleolus, and heel protrusions should be focused on and strengthened. To avoid skin ulcers caused by the plaster brackets' compression of the bone protrusion, the soft cushion should be added to these three components, and the plaster brackets should be removed on a regular basis to check the skin. If the gypsum bracket loosens, it should be replaced on a regular basis. The patient should be instructed to perform lower-limb muscle contraction activities throughout the plaster fixation to prevent lower-limb thrombosis.

Discussion

Occult fractures occur in any bones, although they are most prevalent in the hip. Occult hip fractures account for 0.7%–2.7% of all hip fractures (Grammatopoulos et al., 2018). Other occult fractures have been reported sporadically (Garcia-Mata & Hidalgo-Ovejero, 2019; Mabry et al., 2019; Yoshida & Tsuchida, 2017). However, the occurrence of an occult fracture in the distal part of the fibula is seldom reported, especially in adults with no history of trauma. Therefore, it is easy for an outpatient physician to miss or misdiagnose an occult fracture when a patient has ankle pain. Because of the lack of identifiable clinical signs, the diagnosis of occult fractures mainly depends on effective imaging assessment. On radiographs, occult fractures are difficult to detect. Although computed tomography (CT) may be used to identify occult fractures; its sensitivity is only 87%. But it also leads to missed diagnoses of occult fractures (Haubro et al., 2015). Pearce and Cobby (2011) discovered that an ultrasound scan might reveal fractures that are radiographically occult on conventional radiographs. However, with just 37% sensitivity and 61% specificity for fracture identification, it should not be employed as a first-line approach for identifying occult fractures. Another approach for detecting occult fractures is bone scintigraphy, but its specificity is uncertain and there are difficult-to-discern false-positives (Querellou et al., 2009). Therefore, its application is restricted. MRI has high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of occult fractures, and it is more successful than CT in the early identification of occult fractures (Thavarajah et al., 2011; Wilson et al., 2020). MRI is considered the gold standard in the diagnosis of occult fractures (Haubro et al., 2015). In our case patient, the radiograph was negative for an occult fracture, and it was MRI that finally led to the diagnosis of the occult fracture of the right fibula. MRI was performed when we suspected that the patient might have a ligament injury. Fortunately, an occult fibula fracture was detected and we narrowly avoided a doctor–patient dispute resulting from a nearly missed diagnosis. For occult fibular fracture, the preferred treatment is nonsurgical conservative treatment. However, if the occult fibular fracture is not diagnosed and treated promptly, it might be displaced and lead to serious sequelae. It can also result in medical disputes between doctors and patients. To detect occult fractures and prevent potentially serious sequelae, MRI should be performed as soon as possible in patients who have ankle pain that cannot be relieved by analgesics but appears normal on radiographs.
  9 in total

1.  Does scaphoid bone bruising lead to occult fracture? A prospective study of 50 patients.

Authors:  Dushan Thavarajah; Turab Syed; Yousef Shah; Martin Wetherill
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 2.586

2.  Radiographically occult fracture of the tibial epiphysis: sonographic findings with CT correlation.

Authors:  Tim Pearce; M Cobby
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 0.910

3.  Radiographically Occult Medial Cuneiform Impaction Fracture.

Authors:  Lance M Mabry; Taylor N Patti; Chris M Bleakley
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.751

Review 4.  Occult fractures around the hip.

Authors:  George Grammatopoulos; Catherine McCarthy; Alberto Carli; Wade Gofton
Journal:  Br J Hosp Med (Lond)       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 0.825

5.  Occult tibial plateau fracture.

Authors:  Naoki Yoshida; Yoshihiko Tsuchida
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2017-09-25

6.  Detection of occult wrist fractures by quantitative radioscintigraphy: a prospective study on selected patients.

Authors:  Solene Querellou; Gregory Moineau; Alexandra Le Duc-Pennec; Philippe Guillo; Alexandre Turzo; Yann Cotonea; Dominique Le Nen; Pierre-Yves Salaun
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.690

7.  Sensitivity and specificity of CT- and MRI-scanning in evaluation of occult fracture of the proximal femur.

Authors:  M Haubro; C Stougaard; T Torfing; S Overgaard
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 2.586

8.  Distal radial torus fracture in an adult. A new type of occult wrist fracture?

Authors:  S García-Mata; A Hidalgo-Ovejero
Journal:  An Sist Sanit Navar       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 0.829

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.