| Literature DB >> 36107790 |
Allison Roberts1, Jessica Korona-Bailey1, Sutapa Mukhopadhyay1.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36107790 PMCID: PMC9484803 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7137a5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ISSN: 0149-2195 Impact factor: 35.301
Demographic characteristics of nitazene-involved overdose deaths (N = 52) — Tennessee State Unintentional Drug Overdose Reporting System,* 2020–2021
| Characteristic | No. (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 2021 | |
|
| 10 (100.0) | 42 (100.0) |
|
| 40.6 (13.2) | 42.6 (12.1) |
|
| ||
| Female | 1 (10.0) | 14 (33.3) |
| Male | 9 (90.0) | 28 (66.7) |
|
| ||
| Other | 0 (—) | 5 (11.9) |
| White | 10 (100.0) | 37 (88.1) |
|
| ||
| Metonitazene | 1 (10.0) | 36 (85.7) |
| Isotonitazene | 9 (90.0) | 1 (2.4) |
| Protonitazene | 0 (—) | 2 (4.8) |
| Etonitazene | 0 (—) | 5 (11.9) |
Abbreviation: SUDORS = State Unintentional Drug Overdose Reporting System.
* SUDORS deaths were identified via Tennessee Department of Health, Division of Vital Records and Statistics, Death Statistical System, 2019-2021. 2021 death statistical data are provisional.
† Categories are not mutually exclusive. Nitazene analogs have differing potency. The potency of isotonitazene, protonitazene, and etonitazene greatly exceeds that of fentanyl, whereas the potency of metonitazene is similar to fentanyl.