Dinesh Kumar Sahu1,2, Neetu Singh3, Mumani Das4, Jiledar Rawat5, Devendra Kumar Gupta6. 1. Molecular Biology Unit, Center for Advance Research, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India. dinesh23biotech@gmail.com. 2. Postgraduate Institute of Child Health, Noida, India. dinesh23biotech@gmail.com. 3. Molecular Biology Unit, Center for Advance Research, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India. neetuaashi@yahoo.co.in. 4. Regional Medical Research Centre, Bhubaneswar, India. 5. Department of Paediatric Surgery, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India. 6. Department of Paediatric Surgery, Post Graduate Institute of Child Health, Noida, India.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Wilms' tumor is the most-frequent malignant-kidney tumor in children under 3-4 years of age and is caused by genetic alterations of oncogenes (OG) and tumor-suppressor genes (TG). Wilms' tumor has been linked to many OG-&-TG. However, only WT1 has a proven role in the development of this embryonic-tumor. METHODS: The study investigates the level of mRNA expression of 16 OGs and 20 TGs involved in key-signaling pathways, including chromatin modification; RAS; APC; Cell Cycle/Apoptosis; Transcriptional Regulation; PI3K; NOTCH-&-HH; PI3K & RAS of 24-fresh Wilms'-tumor cases by capture-and-reporter probe Code-Sets chemistry, as CNVs in these pathway genes have been reported. RESULTS: Upon extensively investigating, MEN1, MLL2, MLL3, PBRM1, PRDM1, SMARCB1, SETD2, WT1, PTPN11, KRAS, HRAS, NF1, APC, RB1, FUBP1, BCOR, U2AF1, PIK3CA, PTEN, EBXW7, SMO, ALK, CBL, EP300-and-GATA1 were found to be significantly up-regulated in 58.34, 62.5, 79.17, 91.67, 58, 66.66,54, 58.34, 66.67, 75, 62.5, 62.5, 58, 79.17, 79.17, 75, 70.84, 50, 50, 75, 66.66, 62.50, 61.66, 58.34-and-62.50% of cases respectively, whereas BRAF, NF2, CDH1, BCL2, FGFR3, ERBB2, MET, RET, EGFR-and-GATA2 were significantly down regulated in 58, 87.50, 79.16, 54.16, 79.17, 91.66, 66.66, 58.33, 91.66-and-62.50% of cases, respectively. Interestingly, the WT1 gene was five-fold down regulated in 41.66% of cases only. CONCLUSION: Hence, extensive profiling of OGs and TGs association of major-signaling pathways in Wilms' tumor cases may aid in disease diagnosis. PBRM1 (up-regulated in 91.67% of cases), ERBB2 and EGFR (down-regulated in 91.66 and 91.66% of cases, respectively) could be marker genes. However, validation of all relevant results in a larger number of samples is required.
PURPOSE: Wilms' tumor is the most-frequent malignant-kidney tumor in children under 3-4 years of age and is caused by genetic alterations of oncogenes (OG) and tumor-suppressor genes (TG). Wilms' tumor has been linked to many OG-&-TG. However, only WT1 has a proven role in the development of this embryonic-tumor. METHODS: The study investigates the level of mRNA expression of 16 OGs and 20 TGs involved in key-signaling pathways, including chromatin modification; RAS; APC; Cell Cycle/Apoptosis; Transcriptional Regulation; PI3K; NOTCH-&-HH; PI3K & RAS of 24-fresh Wilms'-tumor cases by capture-and-reporter probe Code-Sets chemistry, as CNVs in these pathway genes have been reported. RESULTS: Upon extensively investigating, MEN1, MLL2, MLL3, PBRM1, PRDM1, SMARCB1, SETD2, WT1, PTPN11, KRAS, HRAS, NF1, APC, RB1, FUBP1, BCOR, U2AF1, PIK3CA, PTEN, EBXW7, SMO, ALK, CBL, EP300-and-GATA1 were found to be significantly up-regulated in 58.34, 62.5, 79.17, 91.67, 58, 66.66,54, 58.34, 66.67, 75, 62.5, 62.5, 58, 79.17, 79.17, 75, 70.84, 50, 50, 75, 66.66, 62.50, 61.66, 58.34-and-62.50% of cases respectively, whereas BRAF, NF2, CDH1, BCL2, FGFR3, ERBB2, MET, RET, EGFR-and-GATA2 were significantly down regulated in 58, 87.50, 79.16, 54.16, 79.17, 91.66, 66.66, 58.33, 91.66-and-62.50% of cases, respectively. Interestingly, the WT1 gene was five-fold down regulated in 41.66% of cases only. CONCLUSION: Hence, extensive profiling of OGs and TGs association of major-signaling pathways in Wilms' tumor cases may aid in disease diagnosis. PBRM1 (up-regulated in 91.67% of cases), ERBB2 and EGFR (down-regulated in 91.66 and 91.66% of cases, respectively) could be marker genes. However, validation of all relevant results in a larger number of samples is required.
Authors: N Rahman; L Arbour; P Tonin; J Renshaw; J Pelletier; S Baruchel; K Pritchard-Jones; M R Stratton; S A Narod Journal: Nat Genet Date: 1996-08 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: M J Coppes; J de Kraker; P J van Dijken; H J Perry; J F Delemarre; M F Tournade; J Lemerle; P A Voûte Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1989-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: J M McDonald; E C Douglass; R Fisher; C F Geiser; C E Krill; L C Strong; D Virshup; V Huff Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1998-04-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Daniela Perotti; Peter Hohenstein; Italia Bongarzone; Mariana Maschietto; Mark Weeks; Paolo Radice; Kathy Pritchard-Jones Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2013-11-20 Impact factor: 6.261