| Literature DB >> 36107112 |
Xiaotong Han1, Ruilin Xiong1, Ling Jin1, Qianyun Chen1, Decai Wang1, Shida Chen1, Xiang Chen1, Jason Ha2,3, Yuting Li1, Yabin Qu4, Rong Lin5, Mingguang He1,2,6, Ian G Morgan7, Yangfa Zeng1, Yizhi Liu1.
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the longitudinal changes in crystalline lens in persistent non-myopic and myopic children.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36107112 PMCID: PMC9483235 DOI: 10.1167/iovs.63.10.10
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci ISSN: 0146-0404 Impact factor: 4.925
Baseline Characteristics of the Study Participants
| Total ( | Persistent Non-Myopia ( | Persistent Myopia ( | Newly Developed Myopia ( | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristic |
| Mean (SD) |
| Mean (SD) |
| Mean (SD) |
| Mean (SD) |
|
| G0 | 1129 | 1126 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| Age (y) | 1049 | 3.68 (0.34) | 1047 | 3.68 (0.34) | 1 | 3.78 (−) | 1 | 4.09 (−) | — |
| Male | 1129 | 591 (52.35) | 1080 | 564 (52.22) | 1 | 0 (0.00) | 2 | 0 (0.00) | — |
| LT (mm) | 239 | 3.59 (0.12) | 237 | 3.59 (0.12) | 1 | 3.38 (/) | 1 | 3.73 (/) | — |
| LP (D) | 239 | 26.58 (1.41) | 237 | 26.59 (1.41) | 1 | 24.95 (/) | 1 | 26.81 (/) | — |
| AL (mm) | 243 | 22.10 (0.60) | 241 | 22.09 (0.60) | 1 | 22.89 (/) | 1 | 22.19 (/) | — |
| G1 | 1324 | 1239 | 10 | 75 | |||||
| Age (y) | 1173 | 6.80 (0.35) | 1096 | 6.79 (0.35) | 8 | 6.91 (0.27) | 69 | 6.83 (0.34) | 0.426 |
| Male | 1324 | 737 (55.66) | 1136 | 631 (55.55) | 10 | 5 (50.00) | 75 | 37(49.33) | 0.464 |
| LT (mm) | 1108 | 3.44 (0.14) | 1030 | 3.45 (0.14) | 8 | 3.40 (0.16) | 70 | 3.40 (0.12) | 0.030 |
| LP (D) | 1101 | 24.24 (1.38) | 1023 | 24.27 (1.38) | 8 | 23.60 (1.17) | 70 | 23.79 (1.40) | 0.007 |
| AL (mm) | 1120 | 22.63 (0.67) | 1042 | 22.59 (0.66) | 8 | 23.52 (0.75) | 70 | 23.02 (0.61) | <0.001 |
| G4 | 1854 | 1107 | 248 | 499 | |||||
| Age | 1744 | 9.53 (0.42) | 1026 | 9.50 (0.43) | 241 | 9.59 (0.35) | 477 | 9.54 (0.41) | 0.008 |
| Male | 1854 | 1005 (54.21) | 1047 | 611 (58.36) | 248 | 123 (49.60) | 499 | 235 (47.09) | <0.001 |
| LT (mm) | 1672 | 3.38 (0.15) | 956 | 3.40 (0.15) | 241 | 3.33 (0.15) | 475 | 3.38 (0.15) | <0.001 |
| LP (D) | 1637 | 23.01 (1.48) | 935 | 23.25 (1.45) | 235 | 22.29 (1.41) | 467 | 22.89 (1.44) | <0.001 |
| AL (mm) | 1654 | 23.25 (0.80) | 950 | 23.03 (0.71) | 236 | 24.08 (0.77) | 468 | 23.28 (0.68) | <0.001 |
| G7 | 867 | 325 | 415 | 121 | |||||
| Age (y) | 846 | 12.56 (0.38) | 312 | 12.56 (0.40) | 415 | 12.56 (0.37) | 119 | 12.55 (0.36) | 0.922 |
| Male | 867 | 463 (53.40) | 314 | 200 (63.69) | 421 | 186 (44.18) | 121 | 69 (57.02) | <0.001 |
| LT (mm) | 781 | 3.35 (0.17) | 256 | 3.39 (0.17) | 408 | 3.32 (0.16) | 117 | 3.34 (0.15) | <0.001 |
| LP (D) | 796 | 21.87 (1.42) | 263 | 22.22 (1.48) | 414 | 21.62 (1.36) | 119 | 21.94 (1.31) | <0.001 |
| AL (mm) | 801 | 24.08 (0.99) | 267 | 23.41 (0.70) | 415 | 24.62 (0.93) | 119 | 23.72 (0.57) | <0.001 |
The P values were calculated by χ2 test for sex and by ANOVA for all other variables.
Among 1129 G0 children, 886 children were enrolled in 2019 and did not have baseline ophthalmic data.
Mean Annual Changes in LT, LP and AL During the Follow-Up
| Persistent Non-Myopia | Persistent Myopia | Newly Developed Myopia | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Mean (SD) |
| Mean (SD) |
| Mean (SD) | ||
| G0 | 1126 | 1 | 2 | ||||
| LT (mm) | 908 | −0.046 (0.039) | 1 | −0.060 (/) | 2 | −0.078 (0.025) | — |
| LP (D) | 880 | −0.858 (0.530) | 1 | −1.232 (/) | 2 | −1.066 (0.523) | — |
| AL (mm) | 943 | 0.178 (0.091) | 1 | 0.515 (/) | 2 | 0.617 (0.206) | — |
| G1 | 1239 | 10 | 75 | ||||
| LT (mm) | 1137 | −0.027 (0.021) | 10 | −0.026 (0.014) | 73 | −0.037 (0.024) | <0.001 |
| LP (D) | 1114 | −0.500 (0.295) | 10 | −0.547 (0.282) | 73 | −0.595 (0.522) | <0.001 |
| AL (mm) | 1148 | 0.163 (0.076) | 10 | 0.388 (0.236) | 73 | 0.403 (0.169) | <0.001 |
| G4 | 1107 | 248 | 499 | ||||
| LT (mm) | 1020 | −0.005 (0.025) | 244 | −0.010 (0.017) | 471 | −0.020 (0.027) | <0.001 |
| LP (D) | 1019 | −0.352 (0.336) | 243 | −0.405 (0.298) | 470 | −0.536 (0.339) | <0.001 |
| AL (mm) | 1027 | 0.172 (0.097) | 244 | 0.403 (0.163) | 472 | 0.419 (0.144) | <0.001 |
| G7 | 325 | 421 | 121 | ||||
| LT (mm) | 297 | 0.013 (0.019) | 413 | 0.015 (0.015) | 119 | 0.002 (0.017) | <0.001 |
| LP (D) | 296 | −0.264 (0.371) | 411 | −0.195 (0.200) | 120 | −0.302 (0.263) | 0.940 |
| AL (mm) | 303 | 0.107 (0.083) | 413 | 0.217 (0.110) | 120 | 0.290 (0.131) | <0.001 |
P for trend was calculated by the linear regression model.
Figure 1.Change in LT and AL with increasing age among persistent myopia and non-myopia children during follow-up. The curves were estimated with LOWESS plots with a smoothing value of 0.50.
Associations Among Changes in Lens Thickness, Lens Power, and Axial Length for Children with Persistent Myopia and Non-Myopia During the Follow-Up
| Linear Regression Model | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LT Change | LP Change | |||
| β (95% CI) |
| β (95% CI) |
| |
| G0 | ||||
| AL growth | — | — | — | — |
| PM (vs. PNM) | — | — | — | — |
| AL growth × PM | — | — | — | — |
| G1 | — | — | — | |
| AL growth | −0.11 (−0.12, −0.10) | <0.001 | −1.66 (−1.87, −1.46) | <0.001 |
| PM (vs. PNM) | 0.0001 (−0.01, 0.01) | 0.987 | −0.05 (−0.22, 0.11) | 0.535 |
| AL growth × PM | 0.08 (0.03, 0.13) | 0.002 | 1.61 (0.85, 2.37) | <0.001 |
| G4 | ||||
| AL growth | −0.11 (−0.12, −0.09) | <0.001 | −1.65 (−.1.83, −1.46) | <0.001 |
| PM (vs. PNM) | −0.004 (−0.008, −0.0008) | 0.015 | −0.05 (−0.09, −0.009) | 0.02 |
| AL growth × PM | 0.07 (0.04, 0.10) | <0.001 | 0.85 (0.45, 1.25) | <0.001 |
| G7 | ||||
| AL growth | −0.09 (−0.12, −0.07) | <0.001 | −1.49 (−1.84, −1.14) | <0.001 |
| PM (vs. PNM) | 0.003 (0.0005, 0.005) | 0.020 | 0.05 (0.02, 0.08) | 0.004 |
| AL growth × PM | 0.05 (0.02, 0.08) | <0.001 | 0.79 (0.38, 1.20) | <0.001 |
For each of subsamples, the regression co-efficient (β) was estimated by a separate model with LT growth and LP change as the dependent variables and AL growth and refractive status (PM vs. PNM) as the independent variables, with an interaction term included, adjusting for sex and height as covariates that are not presented in the table. AL growth and height were centered by subtracting the mean value.
Interaction terms with a positive β value indicate that one unit of AL growth in the PM group would cause more change in outcome than that in the PNM group.
Linear Regression for Associations Among Changes in Lens Thickness, Lens Power, and Axial Length Before and After Myopia Onset
| LT Change | LP Change | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before Myopia Onset | After Myopia Onset | Before Myopia Onset | After Myopia Onset | |||||
| Grade | β (95% CI) |
| β (95% CI) |
| β (95% CI) |
| β (95% CI) |
|
| AL growth, unstandardized estimation | −0.10 (−0.12, −0.09) | <0.001 | −0.03 (−0.05, −0.01) | 0.001 | −1.58 (−1.76, −1.39) | <0.001 | −0.53 (−0.79, −0.26) | <0.001 |
| Difference (95% CI) |
| Difference (95% CI) |
| |||||
| Before vs. after | −0.05 (−0.06, −0.04) | <0.001 | −0.22 (−0.37, −0.07) | 0.003 | ||||
The estimation was derived from a separate regression model with LT growth and LP change as the dependent variable and AL growth as independent variable, adjusting for sex and height as covariates that are not presented in the table.
Bivariate single-factor linear regression for estimating the difference of the effect of AL growth on the outcome before and after myopia onset, adjusting for sex and height as covariates that are not presented in the table.
Figure 2.Change in LT, LP, AL, and SE before and after myopia onset. The year children first met the myopia criteria was defined as year 0 (onset year), the first year prior to onset year was −1, and two years prior was −2. The year following the onset year was designated as +1.