| Literature DB >> 36106038 |
Abstract
Globally, above 1.4 billion adults did not reach the recommended level of physical education in their daily life, thus triple intendent reforms are proposed by the Ministry of Physical Education for the development of sporting leadership in schools, colleges, and universities, which are essentially important for the development of physical and mental health of the students. This article analyzes the situation of lacking sustainable sporting leadership among other factors related to Physical Education (PE) resources in the southern areas of Ningxia. A mixed and multi-method approach was adopted to conduct the study. First, an in-depth but an open-ended qualitative interview with the professionals was carried out, followed by cross-sectional data collected from the respondents in two districts of the southern mountainous area of Ningxia. Moreover, a case study was included to support the phenomenon from a contextual perspective. The study present that PE education needs a modernization and rejuvenation plan to link with PE development and its sustainable execution and implementation for the physical and mental development of the learners. Moreover, it is suggested to strengthen the development of physical education with/through the fields of regional integration of educational resources sharing, cultural elements and integration, latest technological tools, research-based and cultural supported curriculum, and endogenous strength construction to promote the development of school physical education. Furthermore, continuous monitoring and evaluation mechanisms need to be adopted to develop physical education in the region.Entities:
Keywords: physical education; sporting leadership; sustainable leadership; sustainable strategies; technological support
Year: 2022 PMID: 36106038 PMCID: PMC9465482 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.947694
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
FIGURE 1Status of non-availability of PE facilities (Li et al., 2018).
FIGURE 2Sports schedule implementation in schools (author’s pilot data).
FIGURE 3Physical education development model (author’s proposed).
Descriptive data analysis (student data).
| Questions | Mean |
|
| The outdoor areas (e.g., playground, field, facilities) at my school are in good condition. | 1.344 | 3.16 |
| The indoor areas (e.g., gym) at my school are good condition. | 1.137 | 3.72 |
| My school has enough sports equipment for students to use. | 1.274 | 3.04 |
| My school has sports and physical activity equipment that students can use during recess and lunchtime at school. | 1.870 | 3.40 |
| The gym classes at my school are long enough. | 1.084 | 3.48 |
| The gym classes at my school occur often enough during the week. | 1.581 | 3.40 |
| We do a variety of activities in a games class at school. | 1.301 | 3.12 |
| We have good coaches at my school. | 1.382 | 3.64 |
| My school offers other physical activities or organized sports for students after school. | 1.377 | 3.16 |
| I can find out about community physical activity and sports opportunities at my school. | 1.124 | 3.80 |
| Students usually encourage me to participate in sports and physical activity at school. | 1.325 | 3.52 |
| Students usually make negative comments when I’m being physically active at school. | 1.059 | 4.04 |
| Teachers usually encourage me to be physically active at school. | 1.422 | 2.24 |
| My game teacher is physically active with students at school. | 0.988 | 3.32 |
| Teachers supervise students being physically active at recess or lunch. | 1.382 | 2.88 |
| Teachers think physical activity is important for students at my school. | 1.525 | 2.36 |
| The indoor and outdoor areas at my school are safe to use. | 1.377 | 2.84 |
| The equipment at my school is safe to use. | 1.623 | 3.44 |
| The indoor and outdoor areas at my school are supervised. | 4.671 | 3.76 |
| Other students make me feel safe when I am physically active at school. | 1.609 | 2.96 |
| Valid N (list wise) |
Descriptive data analysis (teacher data).
| Mean |
| |
| AF | 1.24605 | 3.3261 |
| TPPT | 1.19884 | 2.4522 |
| SSPE | 1.06326 | 2.4435 |
| SM | 1.00288 | 2.7000 |
| MP | 1.06869 | 3.7478 |
| SRP | 1.21504 | 3.6522 |
| Valid N (list wise) |
Independent t-test to compare the means for PE leadership.
Independent t-test.
| Independent samples | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| PE leadership | Student | 2.365 | 38.00 | 0.003 | 0.748 |
| Faculty | 2.201 | 35.05 | 0.000 | 0.898 | |