Literature DB >> 36105842

A case of primary small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterus.

Taku Miyanaga1, Kohei Tokuyama1, Chiharu Mizoguchi2, Tsutomu Daa3, Yoshihiro Kusaba3, Yoshiki Asayama1.   

Abstract

Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine endometrium is extremely rare and found in <1% of all primary endometrial carcinomas. We report a case of neuroendocrine carcinoma of the endometrium detected in a 65-year-old woman and focus our attention on the main imaging features. The low apparent diffusion coefficient value and high maximum standardized uptake value for neuroendocrine cancer serve to distinguish this cancer from endometrial cancer.
© 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of University of Washington.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ADC; Neuroendocrine carcinoma; PET/CT; SUVmax; Uterine endometrium

Year:  2022        PMID: 36105842      PMCID: PMC9464789          DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2022.07.065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Case Rep        ISSN: 1930-0433


Introduction

Neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) often develop in the gastrointestinal system or respiratory system at a high rate of approximately 90% []. NEC of the uterine endometrium is extremely rare and found in <1% of all primary endometrial carcinomas, and it is also known as an aggressive tumor with a poor prognosis. Only a few cases have been reported in the English literature to date. Here, we report a case of NEC of the uterine endometrium.

Case presentation

A 65-year-old woman was admitted to the Department of Gynecology because of irregular genital bleeding and abdominal mass that had grown for 6 months. Cytodiagnosis performed upon medical examination indicated suspected malignant lymphoma. The laboratory tests were unremarkable, except for the evaluation of serum lactate dehydrogenase (3190 U/L; reference level, 124-222 U/L), neurospecific enolase (level, 153.2 ng/mL; reference level, ≤12.0 ng/mL), carbohydrate antigen 125 (level, 73.3 U/mL; reference level, ≤35.0 U/mL), and progastrin releasing peptide (level 36.6 Pg/mL; reference level, ≦81.0 Pg/mL). Computerized tomography (CT) showed that the uterus was significantly enlarged, with an irregular mass (114 × 99 × 110 mm) observed in the uterine cavity (Fig. 1A). CT also revealed a mass invading the bilateral ovaries and swelling of the lymph nodes in the pelvis and para-aortic site. The mass demonstrated homogeneously low signal intensity on T1-weighted imaging and heterogeneously slightly high signal intensity on T2-weighted imaging (Fig. 1B). The tumor showed high signal intensity on diffusion-weighted imaging (b = 1000 s/mm2) (Fig. 1C) and a low signal intensity on the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map (0.59 × 10–3 mm2/s) (Fig. 1D). Dynamic T1-weighted contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed imaging revealed a gradually increasing enhancement effect (Fig. 1E). Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography with CT (Fig. 2) imaging demonstrated increased high uptake of FDG of the uterine mass (maximum standardized uptake value: SUVmax range 31.5-36.9), nodules of the ovaries (SUVmax range 39.9-43.0), enlarged lymph nodes: inguinal lymph nodes (SUVmax range right lesion 21.2-26.9, left lesion 14.2-18.2), and peritoneal dissemination (SUVmax range 6.1-8.0). Biopsy was performed, and immunohistochemistry revealed positive staining for synaptophysin, cluster of differentiation 56 and Ki67 (95%+), and negative staining for chromogranin. The tumor was diagnosed as small cell NEC. The patient died 6 months later after surgery.
Fig. 1.

(A) Axial contrast-enhanced CT scan shows a bulky mass (arrows) in the uterus with heterogeneous enhancement, suggesting the presence of necrosis. (B) Axial T2-weighted MR image demonstrates the mass (long black arrow) of heterogeneous intensity in the endometrial cavity and multiple lymphadenopathies (short white arrows). (C) Axial diffusion-weighted image shows hyperintensity with border-predominant (white arrowheads) of the mass and lymphadenopathy (long white arrows). (D) ADC map shows low signal intensity in the same site of DWI hyperintensity. (E) Axial contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR image shows the mass of heterogeneous intensity.

Fig. 2.

(A) FDG-PET/CT images demonstrate a bulky mass in the uterine cavity, and the SUVmax of the lesion was 36.9. (B) The SUVmax of the ovarian nodule was 43 (arrowheads).

(A) Axial contrast-enhanced CT scan shows a bulky mass (arrows) in the uterus with heterogeneous enhancement, suggesting the presence of necrosis. (B) Axial T2-weighted MR image demonstrates the mass (long black arrow) of heterogeneous intensity in the endometrial cavity and multiple lymphadenopathies (short white arrows). (C) Axial diffusion-weighted image shows hyperintensity with border-predominant (white arrowheads) of the mass and lymphadenopathy (long white arrows). (D) ADC map shows low signal intensity in the same site of DWI hyperintensity. (E) Axial contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR image shows the mass of heterogeneous intensity. (A) FDG-PET/CT images demonstrate a bulky mass in the uterine cavity, and the SUVmax of the lesion was 36.9. (B) The SUVmax of the ovarian nodule was 43 (arrowheads). Immunohistochemistry revealed positive staining for synaptophysin, cluster of differentiation (CD) 56 and Ki67 (95%+) and negative staining for chromogranin.

Discussion

NEC develops in cells of the pituitary gland, parathyroid gland, adrenal medulla, and other cells with neuroendocrine granules. Primary NEC of the uterus is rare, with an incidence of approximately 1% of all malignant endometrial tumors having the same histological features as small cell cancer seen in the lungs and gastrointestinal tract. At stage IVB, almost all patients undergo total hysterectomy with adnexectomy; however, the prognosis is poor, with a mean survival period of 9 months [1]. Lymph node metastasis, generalized metastases, and intraperitoneal dissemination commonly occur, while the initial clinical symptoms often include irregular vaginal bleeding and abdominal pain. In our case, lymph metastasis and intraperitoneal dissemination were also observed. NEC arising in the uterus is said to differ from the initial diagnosis in approximately 90% of cases. Histologically, most neuroendocrine cancers arising in the endometrium are large-cell cancers, with the same morphology as small cell lung cancer, and in many instances, there is accompanying necrosis in the inner portion of the tumor [1]. Kitajima K et al. [2] reported that the characteristics of primary neuroendocrine cancer of the uterus include a distinct border (72.7%), isointensity on T1WI (59.1%), slightly hyperintense signal on T2WI (68.2%), extremely high intensity on diffusion-weighted imaging (100%), extremely low intensity on ADC mapping (100%), and a dynamic contrast enhancement pattern, gradually increasing the contrast enhancement effect in the late phase (80%), with moderate enhancement (80%), and most of these findings were consistent with our patient. Furthermore, in the report by Qi Wan et al. [3], characteristics seen in primary neuroendocrine cancer of the uterus included extremely high FDG uptake (SUVmax: approximately 36.9) and high FDG uptake in lymph node metastases (SUVmax early = 7.0, SUVmax delayed = 21.4). In the present case, we also found high FDG uptake in the primary lesion, lymph node lesions (uterine mass SUVmax early = 31.5, SUVmax delayed = 36.9), and metastatic lymph nodes (SUVmax early = 8.1, SUVmax delayed = 26.9) [4]. In addition to these characteristics, we currently focused on the reduced ADC values of neuroendocrine cancer. Many imaging characteristics are shared between cancer of the uterine body and primary neuroendocrine cancer of the uterus, making image-based diagnosis difficult. Antonsen et al. [5] summarized reports of uterine body cancer and reported that the ADC value of uterine body cancer was 0.86 ± 0.22 × 10–3 mm2/s, with a negative correlation between the ADC value and cell concentration; however, there was no correlation with the level of invasion. On the other hand, Mebis et al. [6] reported that in neuroendocrine tumors, there is a negative correlation between the ADC value and the level of malignancy, and with regard to G3 in particular, the ADC value is considerably low (0.32-0.67 × 10–3 mm2/s). The SUVmax values were high for uterine body cancer and neuroendocrine cancer; however, it has been reported that the ADC value for neuroendocrine cancer is lower than that of uterine body cancer, which we believe can serve to distinguish this cancer from other types.

Conclusion

The low ADC value and high SUVmax for neuroendocrine cancer serve to distinguish this cancer from endometrial cancer.

Patient consent

The author was unable to obtain written consent from the patient because the patient died. The patient had no known relatives or guardian. Because of the public interest in publication, the anonymization of the patient, and that the patient or their relatives could not be contacted, exceptional agreement for publication of the case report was given by the Editor-in-Chief of the journal Radiology Case Reports.

Availability of data and material

Data available within the article.

Code availability

Not applicable.
  6 in total

1.  Value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and MRI in diagnosing primary endometrial small cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Qi Wan; Qian Jiao; Xinchun Li; Jiaxuan Zhou; Qiao Zou; Yingshi Deng
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 5.087

2.  The SUVmax of 18F-FDG PET correlates with histological grade in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Keiichiro Nakamura; Junichi Kodama; Yoshihiro Okumura; Atsushi Hongo; Susumu Kanazawa; Yuji Hiramatsu
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.437

3.  SUVmax of 18FDG PET/CT as a predictor of high-risk endometrial cancer patients.

Authors:  Sofie Leisby Antonsen; Annika Loft; Rune Fisker; Anne Lerberg Nielsen; Erik Søgaard Andersen; Estrid Høgdall; Ann Tabor; Kirsten Jochumsen; Carsten L Fagö-Olsen; Jon Asmussen; Anne Kiil Berthelsen; Ib Jarle Christensen; Claus Høgdall
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Endometrium: A Clinicopathologic Study of 25 Cases.

Authors:  Cady E Pocrnich; Preetha Ramalingam; Elizabeth D Euscher; Anais Malpica
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 6.394

5.  Correlation Between Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value on MRI and Histopathologic WHO Grades of Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Wouter Mebis; Annemiek Snoeckx; Bob Corthouts; Haroun El Addouli; Simon Nicolay; Astrid Van Hoyweghen; Maarten Spinhoven; Bart Op de Beeck
Journal:  J Belg Soc Radiol       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 1.894

6.  Characteristics of MR Imaging for Staging and Survival Analysis of Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Endometrium: A Multicenter Study in Japan.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kitajima; Takako Kihara; Yusuke Kawanaka; Junko Takahama; Yoshiko Ueno; Takamichi Murakami; Kotaro Yoshida; Fumi Kato; Akiko Takahata; Yoshihiko Fukukura; Jiro Munechika; Yasunari Fujinaga; Takeru Fukunaga; Masahiro Tanabe; Yuichiro Kanie; Ayumu Kido; Tsutomu Tamada; Rika Yoshida; Yuki Kamishima; Koichiro Yamakado
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 2.471

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.