| Literature DB >> 36105752 |
Samuel Jaddu1, S Abdullah1, Madhuresh Dwivedi1, Rama Chandra Pradhan1.
Abstract
The effect on functional properties of kodo millet flour was studied using multipin cold plasma electric reactor. The analysis was carried out at various levels of voltage (10-20 kV) and treatment time (10-30 min) for four different parameters such as water absorption capacity (WAC), oil absorption capacity (OAC), solubility index (SI) and swelling capacity (SC). Response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural network - genetic algorithm (ANN - GA) were adopted for modelling and optimization of process variables. The optimized values obtained from RSM were 20 kV and 17.9 min. On the contrary, 17.5 kV and 23.3 min were the optimized values obtained from ANN - GA. The RSM optimal values of WAC, OAC, SI and SC were 1.51 g/g, 1.40 g/g, 0.06 g/g and 3.68 g/g whereas optimized ANN - GA values were 1.51 g/g, 1.50 g/g, 0.06 g/g and 4.39 g/g, respectively. Infrared spectra, peak temperature, diffractograms and micrographs of both optimized values were analyzed and showed significant differences. ANN showed a higher value of R2 and lesser values of other statistical parameters compared to RSM. Therefore, ANN - GA was treated as the best model for optimization and modelling of cold plasma treated kodo millet flour. Hence, the ANN - GA optimized values of cold plasma treated flour could be utilized for practical applications in food processing industries.Entities:
Keywords: Functional properties; Thermograph; Time; Treatment; Voltage
Year: 2022 PMID: 36105752 PMCID: PMC9465321 DOI: 10.1016/j.fochms.2022.100132
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Chem (Oxf) ISSN: 2666-5662
Fig. 1Schematic diagram of multipin cold plasma reactor (adapted from M/s. Ingenium Naturae pvt. ltd., Gujarat, India).
Experimental and predicted responses of RSM and ANN models.
| Run | Voltage | time | WAC | OAC | SI | SC | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expt | RSM Predd | ANN Predd | Expt | RSM Predd | ANN Predd | Expt | RSM Predd | ANN Predd | Expt | RSM Predd | ANN Predd | |||
| 1 | 15 | 20 | 1.49 ± 0.05 | 1.48 | 1.48 | 1.40 ± 0.09 | 1.40 | 1.40 | 0.076 ± 0.01 | 0.071 | 0.074 | 3.67 ± 0.55 | 3.77 | 3.75 |
| 2 | 7.9 | 20 | 1.56 ± 0.04 | 1.56 | 1.56 | 1.31 ± 0.07 | 1.31 | 1.30 | 0.095 ± 0.03 | 0.092 | 0.095 | 3.94 ± 0.39 | 3.94 | 3.94 |
| 3 | 15 | 20 | 1.50 ± 0.05 | 1.48 | 1.48 | 1.38 ± 0.09 | 1.40 | 1.40 | 0.061 ± 0.03 | 0.071 | 0.074 | 3.67 ± 0.55 | 3.77 | 3.75 |
| 4 | 15.0 | 34.1 | 1.50 ± 0.05 | 1.49 | 1.50 | 1.41 ± 0.07 | 1.42 | 1.41 | 0.108 ± 0.03 | 0.107 | 0.111 | 3.65 ± 0.19 | 3.68 | 3.65 |
| 5 | 15.0 | 20 | 1.48 ± 0.07 | 1.48 | 1.48 | 1.41 ± 0.04 | 1.40 | 1.40 | 0.072 ± 0.03 | 0.071 | 0.074 | 3.83 ± 0.48 | 3.77 | 3.75 |
| 6 | 20 | 30.0 | 1.49 ± 0.03 | 1.49 | 1.49 | 1.43 ± 0.03 | 1.42 | 1.43 | 0.076 ± 0.01 | 0.076 | 0.076 | 3.74 ± 0.23 | 3.73 | 3.65 |
| 7 | 10 | 30.0 | 1.53 ± 0.02 | 1.54 | 1.53 | 1.37 ± 0.06 | 1.36 | 1.37 | 0.109 ± 0.00 | 0.111 | 0.109 | 3.92 ± 0.23 | 3.89 | 3.93 |
| 8 | 15 | 20 | 1.47 ± 0.07 | 1.48 | 1.48 | 1.41 ± 0.04 | 1.40 | 1.40 | 0.066 ± 0.03 | 0.071 | 0.074 | 3.83 ± 0.48 | 3.77 | 3.75 |
| 9 | 10 | 10 | 1.55 ± 0.05 | 1.54 | 1.56 | 1.33 ± 0.03 | 1.33 | 1.33 | 0.075 ± 0.01 | 0.079 | 0.081 | 3.47 ± 0.45 | 3.52 | 3.47 |
| 10 | 22.1 | 20 | 1.53 ± 0.16 | 1.53 | 1.52 | 1.39 ± 0.04 | 1.39 | 1.39 | 0.057 ± 0.01 | 0.056 | 0.057 | 3.76 ± 0.28 | 3.72 | 3.76 |
| 11 | 15 | 5.9 | 1.52 ± 0.04 | 1.53 | 1.52 | 1.37 ± 0.09 | 1.38 | 1.36 | 0.080 ± 0.02 | 0.076 | 0.080 | 3.26 ± 0.14 | 3.18 | 3.09 |
| 12 | 20 | 10 | 1.55 ± 0.03 | 1.54 | 1.55 | 1.39 ± 0.11 | 1.39 | 1.38 | 0.062 ± 0.02 | 0.065 | 0.062 | 3.31 ± 0.15 | 3.38 | 3.17 |
| 13 | 15 | 20 | 1.47 ± 0.07 | 1.48 | 1.48 | 1.41 ± 0.04 | 1.40 | 1.40 | 0.078 ± 0.01 | 0.071 | 0.074 | 3.83 ± 0.48 | 3.77 | 3.75 |
WAC – Water absorption capacity; OAC – Oil absorption capacity; SC – Swelling capacity; SI – Solubility index; Expt – experimental; RSM Predd – RSM predicted; ANN Predd – ANN predicted; all the parameters were expressed in g/g.
Second order polynomial equations of treated kodo millet flour.
| Coefficients | WAC | OAC | SI | SC | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RSM | ANN | RSM | ANN | RSM | ANN | RSM | ANN | ||||
| A | −0.01004 | 0.029264 | −0.01246 | −0.07686 | |||||||
| B | −0.01275 | 0.015682 | 0.010927 | 0.178311 | |||||||
| AB | −0.01086 | 0.000377 | −0.00518 | −0.00404 | |||||||
| A2 | 0.032251 | −0.0249 | 0.001587 | 0.031024 | |||||||
| B2 | 0.014542 | −0.00293 | 0.010562 | −0.16762 | |||||||
| R-Square | 0.9202 | 0.9306 | R-Square | 0.9214 | 0.9307 | R-Square | 0.9197 | 0.9226 | R-Square | 0.9087 | 0.9220 |
| Adj R-Square | 0.8633 | Adj R-Square | 0.8653 | Adj R-Square | 0.8623 | Adj R-Square | 0.8434 | ||||
| Pred R-Square | 0.6775 | Pred R-Square | 0.6741 | Pred R-Square | 0.7674 | Pred R-Square | 0.6831 | ||||
| R VALUE | R VALUE | R VALUE | R VALUE | ||||||||
Training, testing and validation of ANN Model.
| WAC | OAC | SI | SC | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Training | Testing | Validation | Training | Testing | Validation | Training | Testing | Validation | Training | Testing | Validation |
| 2 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| 4 | 3 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 11 | 8 |
| 6 | 9 | 13 | 7 | 12 | 11 | 6 | 13 | 8 | 4 | 12 | 13 |
| 7 | 8 | 7 | 5 | ||||||||
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 7 | ||||||||
| 11 | 10 | 11 | 9 | ||||||||
| 12 | 13 | 12 | 10 | ||||||||
Fig. 2The fitness variation in terms of generations during optimization of genetic algorithm.
Summary of all statistical parameters (AAD, MSE, RSME, NMSE, NRSME, MPE and R2) of variable parameters.
| Coefficient | WAC | OAC | SI | SC | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RSM | ANN | RSM | ANN | RSM | ANN | RSM | ANN | |
| AAD | 0.00783 | 0.00657 | 0.00815 | 0.00875 | 0.00397 | 0.00326 | 0.06034 | 0.06943 |
| MSE | 0.00008 | 0.00007 | 0.00009 | 0.00010 | 0.00002 | 0.00003 | 0.00431 | 0.00747 |
| RMSE | 0.00877 | 0.00853 | 0.00969 | 0.01009 | 0.00473 | 0.00507 | 0.06566 | 0.08644 |
| NMSE | 0.00005 | 0.00005 | 0.00007 | 0.00007 | 0.00029 | 0.00033 | 0.00117 | 0.00203 |
| NRMSE | 0.00581 | 0.00565 | 0.00699 | 0.00728 | 0.06056 | 0.06485 | 0.01783 | 0.02348 |
| MPE | 0.52101 | 0.43743 | 0.58309 | 0.63055 | 5.35311 | 4.24018 | 1.66096 | 1.99149 |
| R2 | 0.92023 | 0.93060 | 0.92143 | 0.93074 | 0.91965 | 0.92263 | 0.90867 | 0.92204 |
All the parameters were expressed in g/g.
Fig. 3a) Thermographs of untreated, optimized RSM and ANN – GA of kodo millet flour b) Infrared spectra of untreated, optimized RSM and ANN – GA of kodo millet flour.
Fig. 4a) Diffractograms of untreated, optimized RSM and ANN – GA of kodo millet flour b) Micrographs of untreated, optimized RSM and ANN – GA of kodo millet flour.