| Literature DB >> 36105638 |
Abstract
This paper introduces the principles and operation steps of convolution and pooling of convolutional neural networks in detail. In view of the shortcomings of fixed sampling points and single receptive field in traditional convolution and pooling forms, deformable convolution and deformable pooling are introduced to enhance the network's ability to adapt to image details and large displacement problems. The concepts of warp, loop optimization, and network stack are introduced. In order to improve the optimization performance of the algorithm, three subnetwork structures and stack models are designed, and various methods are used to improve the prediction accuracy of distance education quality assessment. In order to improve the accuracy and timeliness of education quality assessment, this paper proposes a distance education quality assessment model based on mining algorithms. The prediction index is selected by the improved BP neural network. It is required to establish the input layer node as the input vector based on the number of data sources since the input layer is used for data input. The neural network is trained with a quarter of the mining data, and the mining algorithm is further trained with network error trials. A fuzzy relationship matrix is created based on the assessment of teaching quality's hierarchical structure. This leads to the conclusion of the fuzzy thorough evaluation of the effectiveness of distant learning. Experiments show that the proposed model has an average accuracy of 96%, the average teaching quality modeling time is 25.44 ms, and the evaluation speed is fast.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36105638 PMCID: PMC9467773 DOI: 10.1155/2022/8937314
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
The process of identifying data sources.
| Step | Specific contents |
|---|---|
| Fit state established | Establish fit state in simulation environment |
| Data denoising | Clear wrong data |
| Data source exclusion | Exclude unreliable or marginal data sources |
| Algorithm choice | Select an algorithm for preparing data. Particularly the method that makes up the difference for the data deficiency |
Figure 1Training results.
Network error test results.
| Training function name | dm | da | Dx | lm |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average network error | 0.0014 | 0.0109 | 0.0041 | 0.0007 |
Teaching quality evaluation index hierarchy.
| Target layer | Criterion layer | Indicator layer |
|---|---|---|
| Teaching quality | Teacher teaching situation | T11 well prepared before class |
| T12 The main points of the explanation are highlighted | ||
| T13 link theory with practice | ||
| T14 teacher-student interaction | ||
| T15 modern teaching methods | ||
| T16 focus on ability development | ||
| T17 caring for students | ||
| T18 teacher table | ||
| T19 The overall effect of teaching is good | ||
| Course information | T21 course content | |
| T22 course load |
Figure 2DANet-S structure.
Figure 3Distance education quality assessment mode based on convolutional neural network.
Basic data.
| Basic situation | Category | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 47 |
| Female | 53 | |
|
| ||
| Used identity | Teacher | 21 |
| Student | 79 | |
|
| ||
| Academic area | Natural science | 59 |
| Social science | 41 | |
|
| ||
| Education level | Bachelor degree and below | 57 |
| Graduate student or above | 43 | |
Figure 4Comparison of the accuracy of distance teaching quality assessment.
Figure 5Efficiency comparison of distance teaching quality assessment.
Figure 6Prediction robustness of distance education quality assessment for three algorithms.
Figure 7F1 value predicted by distance education quality assessment of three algorithms.
The generality of distance teaching quality assessment model.
| Course title | Evaluation accuracy/% | Modeling time/s |
|---|---|---|
| University English | 95.23 | 22.61 |
| Communication principle | 94.62 | 23.53 |
| Linear algebra | 94.84 | 23.86 |
| Engineering mechanics | 93.65 | 22.47 |
| University Chinese | 95.13 | 26.95 |
| Basic computer science | 96.35 | 24.67 |
| Machine learning | 95.29 | 23.29 |