| Literature DB >> 36105447 |
Junting Li1,2, Xiaochen Fan1,3, Qifei Deng2, Jingjing Sun2, Liping Jin1,4, Peipei Chen1,4, Pinglian Wei1,5, Annuo Liu1.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of the research article is to explore the significance of continuous nursing of the Omaha system in children after hypospadias surgery and its influence on infection complications.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36105447 PMCID: PMC9458415 DOI: 10.1155/2022/8346848
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contrast Media Mol Imaging ISSN: 1555-4309 Impact factor: 3.009
Comparison of baseline data of two groups of children.
| Group | Control group ( | Study group ( | Statistics |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (case, | Male | 38(100.00) | 38(100.00) | 2.162 | 0.064 |
| Female | 0(0.00) | 0(0.00) | |||
|
| |||||
| Average age (years, | 3.21 ± 0.61 | 3.19 ± 0.59 | 0.192 | 0.109 | |
|
| |||||
| Mean course of disease (months, | 2.42 ± 0.59 | 2.40 ± 0.58 | 0.427 | 0.071 | |
|
| |||||
| Disease types (case, | Penis head type | 18(47.37) | 17(44.74) | 0.418 | 0.115 |
| Penis size | 16(42.11) | 15(39.47) | |||
| Penile scrotal type | 3(7.89) | 5(13.16) | |||
| Perineum type | 1(2.63) | 1(2.63) | |||
|
| |||||
| The split type (case, | I | 12(31.58) | 11(28.95) | 0.439 | 0.058 |
| II | 18(47.37) | 20(52.63) | |||
| III | 5(13.16) | 5(13.16) | |||
| IV | 3(7.89) | 2(5.26) | |||
|
| |||||
| Born way (case, | Natural birth | 21(55.26) | 23(60.53) | 0.637 | 0.136 |
| Caesarean section | 17(44.74) | 15(39.47) | |||
|
| |||||
| Guardian educational level (example, | High school and below | 5(13.16) | 7(18.42) | 0.116 | 0.072 |
| Undergraduate and junior college | 19(50.00) | 18(47.37) | |||
| Postgraduate and above | 14(36.84) | 13(34.21) | |||
The comparison of Omaha system score between the two groups (, points).
| Group | Time | Control group ( | Study group ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physiological | Before the intervention | 8.32 ± 2.07 | 8.32 ± 2.13 |
| After the intervention | 9.17 ± 2.11 | 12.95 ± 2.16 | |
|
| |||
| Psychological | Before the intervention | 8.06 ± 2.02 | 8.06 ± 2.01 |
| After the intervention | 9.23 ± 2.15 | 11.63 ± 2.13 | |
|
| |||
| Environment | Before the intervention | 7.94 ± 2.10 | 7.93 ± 2.08 |
| After the intervention | 9.54 ± 2.16 | 13.57 ± 2.21 | |
|
| |||
| Health behavior | Before the intervention | 8.13 ± 1.93 | 8.14 ± 1.96 |
| After the intervention | 9.83 ± 1.98 | 11.42 ± 2.02 | |
Note. Compared with before intervention, P < 0.05. Compared with the control group before intervention, P < 0.05.
Comparison of complication rates (cases, %).
| Group | Control group ( | Study group ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infection | 3(7.89) | 1(2.63) | — | — |
| Red bleeding | 4(10.53) | 2(5.26) | — | — |
| Urinary fistula | 1(2.63) | 0(0.00) | — | — |
| Urethral diverticulum | 1(2.63) | 1(2.63) | — | — |
| Urethral stricture | 2(5.26) | 0(0.00) | — | — |
| Complication rate | 28.95% | 10.53% | 2.310 | 0.015 |
Comparison of quality of life level (, points).
| Group | Time | Control group ( | Study group ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physiological function | Before the intervention | 43.26 ± 10.69 | 43.30 ± 10.67 |
| After the intervention | 51.09 ± 12.04 | 56.93 ± 13.28 | |
|
| |||
| Psychological and social function | Before the intervention | 45.62 ± 11.07 | 45.68 ± 11.21 |
| After the intervention | 49.86 ± 12.52 | 55.94 ± 14.47 | |
|
| |||
| Emotional function | Before the intervention | 59.66 ± 13.62 | 59.27 ± 13.45 |
| After the intervention | 65.32 ± 15.18 | 78.72 ± 17.62 | |
|
| |||
| Social interaction | Before the intervention | 47.62 ± 11.36 | 47.75 ± 11.41 |
| After the intervention | 56.38 ± 13.94 | 68.95 ± 15.71 | |
|
| |||
| State of the school | Before the intervention | 49.63 ± 10.15 | 49.85 ± 10.27 |
| After the intervention | 54.87 ± 12.26 | 66.43 ± 14.58 | |
Note. Compared with the control group before intervention, P < 0.05.
Comparison of total nursing satisfaction (example, %).
| Group | Control group ( | Study group ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Very satisfied | 16(42.11) | 19(50.00) | — | — |
| Generally satisfied | 9(23.68) | 11(28.95) | — | — |
| Satisfied | 6(15.79) | 6(15.79) | — | — |
| Not satisfied | 7(18.42) | 2(5.26) | — | — |
| Complication rate | 81.59% | 94.74% | 0.391 | 0.007 |