| Literature DB >> 36105359 |
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords: chicken; gut; myogenic; peristalsis; refractory period
Year: 2022 PMID: 36105359 PMCID: PMC9465477 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.979646
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Dev Biol ISSN: 2296-634X
FIGURE 1A probabilistic refractory period model of the intestinal smooth muscle syncitium reproduces the contractile wave patterns observed in chicken at E8, E12 and E14. (A) Spatiotemporal map for p = 0.02, τ = 50 s, yielding f = 0.6 cpm. Rostro-caudal waves in green, caudo-rostral waves in dark blue, nucleation sites in yellow. Inset: the wave pattern is reminiscent of the pigmentation of some seashells (Meinhardt and Klingler, 1987). (B) Homogeneous distribution of nucleation sites along the gut corresponding to (A). (C) Spatiotemporal map for p = 0.4, τ = 40 s, yielding f = 1.4 cpm. (D) Peaked distribution of nucleation sites (OPWs) along the gut corresponding to (C). (E) Color-coded map of the average number of nucleation sites (OPWs) as a function of the refractory period τ and of the nucleation probability p. Frequency isolines at 0.6, 1 and 1.4 cpm are shown. Red dots: parameters used in (A,C,F) with the suggested developmental trajectory. (F) Spatiotemporal map for p = 0.1, τ = 30 s with an additional rostral pacemaker with f = 2 cpm. The diagram is progressively invaded by rostro-caudal waves from the pacemaker site when the nucleation probability in the rest of the gut smooth muscle is low enough.