| Literature DB >> 36104716 |
Federico Perdomo-Celis1, David Arcia-Anaya2, Juan Carlos Alzate3, Paula A Velilla1, Francisco J Díaz1, Maria Paulina Posada4, María T Rugeles1, Natalia A Taborda5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) has decreased the mortality associated with HIV infection, complete immune reconstitution is not achieved despite viral suppression. Alterations of CD8+ T cells and some of their subpopulations, such as interleukin (IL)-17-producing cells, are evidenced in treated individuals and are associated with systemic inflammation and adverse disease outcomes. We sought to evaluate if different CD8+ T cell subsets are differentially normalized during a clinical follow-up of people living with HIV (PLWH) receiving suppressive cART.Entities:
Keywords: Antiretroviral therapy; CD8-positive T-lymphocytes; HIV; Immune reconstitution
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36104716 PMCID: PMC9476577 DOI: 10.1186/s12981-022-00465-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AIDS Res Ther ISSN: 1742-6405 Impact factor: 2.846
Demographic data and T cell counts in the study cohort
| Parameter | HIV sample 1 | HIV sample 2 | Seronegative | P-value | P-value | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | 16 | 15 | NA | NA | NA | |
| Age (years) | 33 (24–52) | 27 (25–28) | NA | 0.16 | NA | |
| Estimated date of serodiagnosis (Months after HIV diagnosis) | 36 (25–100) | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
| CD4+ T cells count (cells/μL) | 642 (533–705) | 854 (811–1122) | 634 (535–1192) | 0.0007 | 0.49 | 0.08 |
| CD8+ T cells count (cells/μL) | 830 (598–1078) | 948 (552–1265) | 460 (361–537) | 0.27 | < 0.0001 | 0.0007 |
| CD4:CD8 ratio | 0.75 (0.59–0.99) | 1.15 (0.72–1.58) | 1.6 (1.4–2.3) | 0.0037 | < 0.0001 | 0.0163 |
1Wilcoxon test
2Mann–Whitney test. NA: Does not apply; IQR: interquartile range
Fig. 1CD8+ T cell functional features as markers of immune reconstitution in PLWH receiving cART. A PAMR estimated model accuracy and feature false discovery rate as a function of model regularization threshold from CITRUS algorithm. The green point indicates the threshold and error rate of the selected model. B Heat map showing the abundance of each cluster obtained with the model in the three groups of individuals included (HIV samples 1 and 2, and seronegative individuals’ sample 1). C Relationship of the clusters obtained with the model. The two discriminatory clusters (93 and 85) are shown in red. D Abundance and features of the two selected discriminatory clusters (93 and 85) in the three groups of individuals included (HIV samples 1 and 2, and seronegative individuals’ sample 1). E Frequencies of cluster 85 (left panel) and cluster 93 (right panel) obtained by manual flow gating in the three group of samples. P value of Dunn’s post-hoc test
Fig. 2Partial reconstitution of the activation/exhaustion phenotype despite continuous cART in PLWH. Frequencies of CD8+ T cells that are HLA-DR+ CD38+ (A), PD-1+ (B), and PD-1+ TIM-3+ (C) in PLWH and seronegative controls samples 1 and 2. NS: Not statistically significant. Mann–Whitney and Wilcoxon tests were used to analyze independent and paired samples, respectively. HIV samples = 16; Seronegative samples = 15
Fig. 3Reconstitution of the cytotoxic program of total CD8+ T cells in PLWH receiving cART. Frequencies of CD8+ T cells that are Perforin+ Granzyme B+ (A), CD107a+ (B), IFN-γ+ (C), and IL-17+ (D) after stimulation with PMA/ionomycin, in PLWH and seronegative controls samples 1 and 2. NS: Not statistically significant. Mann–Whitney and Wilcoxon tests were used to analyze independent and paired samples, respectively. HIV samples = 16; Seronegative samples = 15
Fig. 4Reconstitution of the cytotoxic program, but not IL-17 production, of HLA-DR+ CD38+ CD8+ T cells in PLWH receiving cART. Frequencies of HLA-DR+ CD38+ CD8+ T cells that are Perforin+ Granzyme B+ (A), CD107a+ (B), and IL-17+ (C) after stimulation with PMA/ionomycin, in PLWH and seronegative controls samples 1 and 2. NS: Not statistically significant. Mann–Whitney and Wilcoxon tests were used to analyze independent and paired samples, respectively. HIV samples = 16; Seronegative samples = 15