Literature DB >> 36104539

The Prevalence of Kashin-Beck Disease in China: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Junkui Xu1, Junhu Wang1, Hongmou Zhao2.   

Abstract

Kashin-Beck disease (KBD) is a serious degenerative chronic joint disease. However, there are few quantitative syntheses of KBD prevalence studies. In this study, an initial systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to study the prevalence of KBD in China. Five databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WanFang Data, and the China Science-Technology Journal Database (VIP)) were searched by performing an overall search method to identify studies of KBD prevalence in China that were published from the inception of the database to May 30, 2022. The risk of bias was assessed with the standardized risk of bias tool. Heterogeneity was assessed with the I2 statistic. A random-effect meta-analysis was performed to study the prevalence of KBD through an analysis of published studies. A total of 34 studies involving 24,820 patients with KBD were included in this meta-analysis. These studies were geographically divided into 3 endemic areas. The pooled overall prevalence rate for KBD was 0.06% (95% CI, 0.04-0.08%). The pooled prevalence estimates were 0.05% (95% CI, 0.01-0.12%) for northeast endemic areas, 0.06% (95% CI, 0.03-0.09%) for northwest endemic areas, and 0.04% (95% CI, 0-0.14%) for southwest endemic areas. There was a negative correlation between KBD prevalence and the publication year. No potential risk of publication bias was found by Begg's test and Egger's test. The publication year and quality score were significantly associated with the detected heterogeneity. Our study indicates that the occurrence and development of KBD have been effectively controlled in recent decades. More effective strategies are needed to prevent and treat KBD.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Correlation analysis; Kashin-Beck disease; Meta-analysis; Prevalence

Year:  2022        PMID: 36104539     DOI: 10.1007/s12011-022-03417-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res        ISSN: 0163-4984            Impact factor:   4.081


  13 in total

Review 1.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Simon G Thompson; Jonathan J Deeks; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-09-06

2.  Assessing risk of bias in prevalence studies: modification of an existing tool and evidence of interrater agreement.

Authors:  Damian Hoy; Peter Brooks; Anthony Woolf; Fiona Blyth; Lyn March; Chris Bain; Peter Baker; Emma Smith; Rachelle Buchbinder
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Meta-analysis of prevalence.

Authors:  Jan J Barendregt; Suhail A Doi; Yong Yi Lee; Rosana E Norman; Theo Vos
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test.

Authors:  M Egger; G Davey Smith; M Schneider; C Minder
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-09-13

Review 5.  Integrative Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis of Risk Factors for Kashin-Beck disease.

Authors:  Fang-Fang Yu; Huan Liu; Xiong Guo
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Nutrients Other than Selenium Are Important for Promoting Children's Health in Kashin-Beck Disease Areas.

Authors:  Yujie Ning; Xi Wang; Xiong Guo; Pan Zhang; Pengfei Qu; Feng Zhang; Sen Wang; Yanxia Lei; Mikko Lammi
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Serum and Hair Zinc Levels in Patients with Endemic Osteochondropathy in China: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xi Wang; Pan Zhang; Yujie Ning; Lei Yang; Fangfang Yu; Xiong Guo
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael Borenstein; Larry V Hedges; Julian P T Higgins; Hannah R Rothstein
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2010-11-21       Impact factor: 5.273

9.  Seriously misleading results using inverse of Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation in meta-analysis of single proportions.

Authors:  Guido Schwarzer; Hiam Chemaitelly; Laith J Abu-Raddad; Gerta Rücker
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 5.273

10.  The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.

Authors:  Matthew J Page; Joanne E McKenzie; Patrick M Bossuyt; Isabelle Boutron; Tammy C Hoffmann; Cynthia D Mulrow; Larissa Shamseer; Jennifer M Tetzlaff; Elie A Akl; Sue E Brennan; Roger Chou; Julie Glanville; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Manoj M Lalu; Tianjing Li; Elizabeth W Loder; Evan Mayo-Wilson; Steve McDonald; Luke A McGuinness; Lesley A Stewart; James Thomas; Andrea C Tricco; Vivian A Welch; Penny Whiting; David Moher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2021-03-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.